How (and why) to Ramble on your goat sideways
In general, if you're interviewing for a tech position, don't you expect at least a few "gotcha" questions to see if you're faking it? In my last interview, in the midst of telling them about my hobbies, one of the interviewers suddenly asked me what NAT stood for and basically how it worked.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,050
Total Cats: 6,608
In general, if you're interviewing for a tech position, don't you expect at least a few "gotcha" questions to see if you're faking it? In my last interview, in the midst of telling them about my hobbies, one of the interviewers suddenly asked me what NAT stood for and basically how it worked.
If I ask a person "What is ASI," I don't expect them to be able to recite for me every little technical detail about how the encapsulation works, how MPEG works, how the streams are formatted and multiplexed, etc. I do expect them to say something like "It's a transport mechanism which is compatible with SDI at the physical layer, so it can use the same DAs and routers, but unlike SDI it allows you to carry multiple streams of MPEG-compressed video & audio over a single link. Usually, you use it to send the encoded airchain signal out to the transmitter, or to bring signals into the station from a satellite or ENG receiver."
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
In general, if you're interviewing for a tech position, don't you expect at least a few "gotcha" questions to see if you're faking it? In my last interview, in the midst of telling them about my hobbies, one of the interviewers suddenly asked me what NAT stood for and basically how it worked.
I guess it depends on what the specifics of the position actually are. If you were interviewing as a Network Engineer or a position where you would be dealing with the nuts and bolts of internal routing then yeah, the response would need to be significantly more detailed.
I mean, what were you reasonably expecting as an answer?
I would expect something super generic like "a subnet mask helps the TCP protocol determine if a host is on the local or a remote subnet" but no way would I expect anyone to sit down and start breaking out the binary.
I would expect something super generic like "a subnet mask helps the TCP protocol determine if a host is on the local or a remote subnet" but no way would I expect anyone to sit down and start breaking out the binary.
Did you know that there's a perfect hash to identify IPv4 net masks? It turns out that if you take the 32 bit representation and mod it by 37 then all 33 valid net masks will fall into different buckets.
--Ian
(wrote software for 14 years at Cisco, now 5 years at Arista Networks )
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Actually a netmask is more of an IP layer thing than a TCP one.
Did you know that there's a perfect hash to identify IPv4 net masks? It turns out that if you take the 32 bit representation and mod it by 37 then all 33 valid net masks will fall into different buckets.
--Ian
(wrote software for 14 years at Cisco, now 5 years at Arista Networks )
Did you know that there's a perfect hash to identify IPv4 net masks? It turns out that if you take the 32 bit representation and mod it by 37 then all 33 valid net masks will fall into different buckets.
--Ian
(wrote software for 14 years at Cisco, now 5 years at Arista Networks )
Are your talking about the gray cable that goes up (to the router) or the one that goes down (the one that was plugged into the laptop I was using to configure stuff)?
--Ian
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
I have plenty of cats. We can make this happen.
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Yes, GBIC generally goes into SFP port. You can tell how often I get into these things.
Yes.
What, are you too good for a serial cable? Sorry, I have a metric buttload of aging Cisco infrastructure stuff on site that's all serial console cable. (I'm probably just jealous because I have no formal training with IOS and not enough regular use to be any kind of proficient.)
Speaking of web interfaces, were you still with Cisco when they acquired Meraki? Why did it take so god damn long for Cisco to integrate Merakis web interface stuff? Seriously, the management tools are amazing. I just wrapped up an infrastructure project where we replaced about 150 ancient Cisco Aironet APs with Aerohive hardware. The interface is ok, but what I've seen of Meraki is so much better. :(
What, are you too good for a serial cable? Sorry, I have a metric buttload of aging Cisco infrastructure stuff on site that's all serial console cable. (I'm probably just jealous because I have no formal training with IOS and not enough regular use to be any kind of proficient.)
Speaking of web interfaces, were you still with Cisco when they acquired Meraki? Why did it take so god damn long for Cisco to integrate Merakis web interface stuff? Seriously, the management tools are amazing. I just wrapped up an infrastructure project where we replaced about 150 ancient Cisco Aironet APs with Aerohive hardware. The interface is ok, but what I've seen of Meraki is so much better. :(
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,050
Total Cats: 6,608
We still have several ****-kilograms of SC / GBIC in use here, mostly in our big-goomba 6500 core switches. The newer stuff is all SFP / LC.
What, are you too good for a serial cable? Sorry, I have a metric buttload of aging Cisco infrastructure stuff on site that's all serial console cable. (I'm probably just jealous because I have no formal training with IOS and not enough regular use to be any kind of proficient.)
Speaking of web interfaces, were you still with Cisco when they acquired Meraki? Why did it take so god damn long for Cisco to integrate Merakis web interface stuff? Seriously, the management tools are amazing. I just wrapped up an infrastructure project where we replaced about 150 ancient Cisco Aironet APs with Aerohive hardware. The interface is ok, but what I've seen of Meraki is so much better. :(
Speaking of web interfaces, were you still with Cisco when they acquired Meraki? Why did it take so god damn long for Cisco to integrate Merakis web interface stuff? Seriously, the management tools are amazing. I just wrapped up an infrastructure project where we replaced about 150 ancient Cisco Aironet APs with Aerohive hardware. The interface is ok, but what I've seen of Meraki is so much better. :(
I left Cisco in 2011, the Meraki acquisition appears to have been in 2012. As for why it took so long -- Cisco's software development is broken. Everything is forked, even though everything nominally runs IOS (or NXOS or whatever else) and the first 4 to 6 numbers in the version string may be the same, you should really think of every different product they make as running its own unique software image on its own ClearCase branch, with bug fixes taking months if not years to go from one place to another if indeed they ever happen at all.
I worked on the Catalyst 4000/4500 platform software. If you've ever used a 4500 to do hardware layer 3 packet forwarding, you've used my code.
--Ian