Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

How (and why) to Ramble on your goat sideways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 08:43 AM
  #28601  
fooger03's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,149
Total Cats: 230
From: Columbus, OH
Default

I'd rather have family members reaching across a sink to hand me something than reaching across a stove. Additionally, the island can be used for quite a few other things - as a dining area, as a party serving area, as a place to play board games, or generally as just an ideal place to gather around, set drinks, and give each other dumb looks. Most hosts generally don't want that hot cooktop *between* them and their guests while they're preparing the evening meal. Similarly, my grill is generally placed such that the front of the grill is facing the logical gathering area, and the back of the grill is towards the edge of the deck. No ventilation hood is necessary - it's just much more "group friendly" to turn away from your guests for brief periods of time rather than staring at them over or through the smoke of burning fat as it flares up from dripping onto the flavorizer bars.

My best friend's parents have a very nice home with the sink against the window and the cooktop on the island. It's an electric cooktop, so right up front, they're not serious about cooking; I've seen it used as a table surface for art, crafts, homework, etc. There is no hood over top of the cooking area - but then, it's electric, so it's not like you'd need one anyways.
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 08:50 AM
  #28602  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by good2go
It's actually not. Any serious cooking on the stove requires serious ventilation (unless you want your house to stink for hours after every meal). The updraft required for serious (high BTU) cooking is not discrete in the least, especially when you have raised ceilings, and thus makes a rather grotesque monolith in what could otherwise be an open and airy room (which all the rage, BTW).

[discussion of downdraft, on which I agree]

At some point, you have to decide if you are serious about cooking, or about looks (and resale value).
I don't buy any of this.

For starters, the tiny, urban kitchens in the three apartments in which I seriously learned to embrace cooking (Hoboken, UES, Wrigleyville) all lacked external exhaust above the range. Yes, there were many smoke-alarm moments. But I checked the NEC, and it's not specifically prohibited to place AC-powered smoke alarms on switched circuits. Just put a switch on the island next to the switch which controls the fan in the vent hood. To wit:






Not buying the grotesque monolith argument.





Originally Posted by codrus
It's also safer and more practical to keep the heat-soaked cooktop up against a wall.
Serious question: Why?

Originally Posted by codrus
Of course, I think open plan kitchens are stupid.
Serious question: Why?
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 09:41 AM
  #28603  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Joe's house design:





All fires to the middle of the room!!
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 09:57 AM
  #28604  
mreakus's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 211
Total Cats: 15
From: Haddonfield, NJ
Default

Honestly, I would agree with you, Joe. The issue I see is the ventilation blocks the open-concept most consumers are after. Further, those downdraft systems are inefficient so the ultimate compromise is to put the sink in the center. In my experience, it is easier to have a conversation over cleaning up some dishes than focusing on a serious conversation while cooking.
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 11:41 AM
  #28605  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Serious question: Why?
As a parent of a very active child, I appreciate having hot pans full of boiling liquid tucked away next to a wall, rather than placed in the center of a large room with nothing to shield them.

Open plan kitchens are stupid because you've immediately blown away something like a third of your available cabinet storage, meaning that you need to decdicate more square footage of your house to achieve the same utility level of the kitchen. They're also stupid because when I'm cooking something, the last thing I want is for everyone in the house to be yammering away at me. Give me some space to work.

You're probably one of those people who think open plan offices are great too, aren't you?

--Ian
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 11:55 AM
  #28606  
good2go's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,815
Total Cats: 1,237
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez

I don't buy any of this.
...
[mildly grotesque pics]

Not buying the grotesque monolith argument.
Clearly, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Also, ceiling heights were still within reason (8'-10') in both of those. Show me a decent looking pic of one where the ceiling height is in the 12'-14' range. Besides the elephant in the room distraction, how does one even properly brace/support a pendulum hanging from a high ceiling such that it does not move laterally when the operator touches it?
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 01:48 PM
  #28607  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

I prefer not to be burdened with watching the hired help prepare my meals. Used to be so much easier when you had a Breezeway between the kitchen and the rest of the house.

Scuse me while I retire to The Parlor.
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 02:24 PM
  #28608  
z31maniac's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
From: OKC, OK
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
You're probably one of those people who think open plan offices are great too, aren't you?
--Ian
Where I started this year, I thought I would hate it, but it's not bad. I sit next to a giant wall of windows and can see downtown and the Capitol building. If I don't want to hear other people I'll go grab one of the individual conference rooms or put on my headphones. But on any given day 50% or more of the people are working from home.

But being a Tech Writer it's sometimes good because QA, Devs, etc, may be discussing a feature/fix/etc that I'm documenting and may pick something up I hadn't heard before, or leads me to ask more questions.

Also, here is an absolutely disgusting building in OKC. Cheap ripoff of the Frank Lloyd Wright building that is in Bartlesville, OK.




The Price Tower.

Old Jun 27, 2017 | 02:24 PM
  #28609  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
I prefer not to be burdened with watching the hired help prepare my meals. Used to be so much easier when you had a Breezeway between the kitchen and the rest of the house.

Scuse me while I retire to The Parlor.
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 02:33 PM
  #28610  
z31maniac's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
From: OKC, OK
Default

^Middle-class folks wouldn't typically have live in help.
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 02:50 PM
  #28611  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

I don't even know why we're discussing kitchens when the biggest issue with contemporary house design is the ubiquity of giant master bathrooms with monstrous elevated spa/whirlpool/tub things. Spending hours in a giant bubble bath is not luxury, it's what a poor person imagines luxury must be. Real luxury is having an efficiently laid out floor plan that provides adequate and appropriate space for storage and normal daily activities. I spend about 20 minutes a day in the bathroom; I don't need a tub big enough to swim laps in, nor do I need a bathroom counter longer than a shuffleboard.



This example is not the worst offender by far, but it demonstrates the point. This is actually in a house we might consider. However, while the house is 1900+ sq ft, it's only 3 bedrooms, without even a bonus room or office to speak of. Look at the stupid arrangement with all of that wasted space directly behind the tub, and consider that even more space is wasted since the tub itself juts out into the rest of the bathroom.
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 04:02 PM
  #28612  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac
^Middle-class folks wouldn't typically have live in help.
How quaint.

And they likely wouldn't have breezeways separating the kitchen from the rest of the house.

But that, I say, that is how we do it down here.

Old Jun 27, 2017 | 09:10 PM
  #28613  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
Joe's house design:

(the 70s)

All fires to the middle of the room!!
Not a fan of the conversation pit, but I dig the overall vibe.




Originally Posted by mreakus
Honestly, I would agree with you, Joe. The issue I see is the ventilation blocks the open-concept most consumers are after.(...) In my experience, it is easier to have a conversation over cleaning up some dishes than focusing on a serious conversation while cooking.
1: The hood shall be mounted above eye-level. Specifically, above *my* eye-level. That covers 95% of humans. I've been in two homes (of friends down in FL) whose kitchens had an island cooktop and a tall hood. Both were awesome.

2: Personal experience as an adult visiting home at the holidays: The kitchen in my sister's house is of a semi-open design. (It opens out into the dining room, and tangentially into the living room.) And around Christmastime, cooking is always taking place. Much conversation occurs during the cooking process. Less so during the cleanup process, as people are stuffed and otherwise engaged.




Originally Posted by codrus
As a parent of a very active child, I appreciate having hot pans full of boiling liquid tucked away next to a wall, rather than placed in the center of a large room with nothing to shield them.
Fair enough. I got snipped years ago, and I'm done with being the step-dad. Not a concern.


Originally Posted by codrus
Open plan kitchens are stupid because you've immediately blown away something like a third of your available cabinet storage, meaning that you need to decdicate more square footage of your house to achieve the same utility level of the kitchen.
This is very true. You do have to dedicate more floor space to make it a workable design. The house I just rented in NC has an island kitchen, and yet it also has more countertop and storage space (including a walk-in pantry) than any other I've occupied. Very much looking forward to breaking it in, even if the sink & cooktop are reversed.



Originally Posted by codrus
You're probably one of those people who think open plan offices are great too, aren't you?
Depends on your definition of "open plan."

Most people think "tech startup" when they hear this. Huge benches, zero personal space. Not a fan.



Back in NYC, the engineering management office was of a semi-open plan. Here's what it looked like in CAD:



Each desk had a partition which was about top-of-head high, with clear glass for the upper 12". This was perfect. You still have your space, but if you need to ask the IT boss if his folks are screwing with the extranet router, you just stand up and ask. The big table in the middle was awesome. Held several E-size plots, and allowed for easy collaboration. Big whiteboards near the door and behind my desk that got used a lot. I loved that layout.


At my current gig, I have an office with a door. My VP has an office with a door. So do my IT manager, my media manager, and so on. I hate it. My office is nice, but not all prison cells need be dank and smelly. I spend as little time as possible there, as I feel like a rat in a cage.


Back at Harris, we had cubicles. They were large cubicles, but still cubicles. I dismantled the outward-facing wall of mine, and re-arranged the interior bits so that I faced outwards when sitting at my desk, with the "tinkering with ****" area in the rear. Loved it.





Originally Posted by good2go
Also, ceiling heights were still within reason (8'-10') in both of those. Show me a decent looking pic of one where the ceiling height is in the 12'-14' range. Besides the elephant in the room distraction, how does one even properly brace/support a pendulum hanging from a high ceiling such that it does not move laterally when the operator touches it?
1: This is a mechanical engineering problem, not a human-factors problem.

2: Why would the chef be touching the hood? On the nice models, the fan & lighting are controlled remotely, by switches mounted on the island. Also, the bulk of the mass (the fan & motor assembly) are mounted up in the attic, not in the hood itself.
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 09:18 PM
  #28614  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
At my current gig, I have an office with a door. My VP has an office with a door. So do my IT manager, my media manager, and so on. I hate it. My office is nice, but not all prison cells need be dank and smelly. I spend as little time as possible there, as I feel like a rat in a cage.
I'm a software guy. That means I spend large amount of time staring at a screen, juggling complex relationships between a dozen or so different moving parts in my head. People 10 feet away from me having inane conversations (or even legimate, work-related conversations) are very, very distracting.

I'd love to have an office with a door I could close again. I had one for about 2 years when I worked at Qualcomm in the mid 90s, and it's been cubes ever since. I hate it.

--Ian
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 09:22 PM
  #28615  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
I don't even know why we're discussing kitchens when the biggest issue with contemporary house design is the ubiquity of giant master bathrooms with monstrous elevated spa/whirlpool/tub things. Spending hours in a giant bubble bath is not luxury, it's what a poor person imagines luxury must be. Real luxury is having an efficiently laid out floor plan that provides adequate and appropriate space for storage and normal daily activities. I spend about 20 minutes a day in the bathroom; I don't need a tub big enough to swim laps in, nor do I need a bathroom counter longer than a shuffleboard.

(image)

This example is not the worst offender by far, but it demonstrates the point. This is actually in a house we might consider. However, while the house is 1900+ sq ft, it's only 3 bedrooms, without even a bonus room or office to speak of. Look at the stupid arrangement with all of that wasted space directly behind the tub, and consider that even more space is wasted since the tub itself juts out into the rest of the bathroom.
Completely agreed here. The bathroom in my new place has a huge tub, and as a result, a smaller-than-optimum shower:



I don't like it, but I get that it's an impulsive selling-point.

Doesn't bother me that much, as I don't consider the bathroom to be a major focal-point of social life, nor a place in which I spend recreational time. I ****, I shower, I brush my teeth. As a general rule, I prefer to spend as little time in the bathroom as possible, regardless of layout.

That would be in contrast to the kitchen, which is a major recreational area in which I enjoy spending time. I'm already mentally working up the layout, and have idented the new stand-mixer I intend to buy, along with the articulating arm for the tablet. The speaker layout will be perfect.
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 09:28 PM
  #28616  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

If other people can see me browsing mt.net at work then it's too open.
​​​​​​
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 10:01 PM
  #28617  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
If other people can see me browsing mt.net at work then it's too open.
​​​​​​
With a reasonably good pair of binoculars, a fair number of people in the Pfizer world headquarters building on the north side of 42nd street between 1st and 2nd Aves could have seen me browsing MT.



Not really worried about that, in much the same way that the fine-looking young woman who lived on the 10th floor of the building just to the west of Pfizer didn't seem all that worried about us watching her get out of the shower every morning from the newsroom. With the $16,000 telephoto lens.

Old Jun 28, 2017 | 12:10 PM
  #28618  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
If other people can see me browsing mt.net at work then it's too open.
​​​​​​
back to the wall, my brother
Old Jun 28, 2017 | 12:57 PM
  #28619  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac
^Middle-class folks wouldn't typically have live in help.
In Peru, almost all middle class folk have live-in help. Not going to complain about the "Third World"
Old Jun 28, 2017 | 01:10 PM
  #28620  
z31maniac's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
From: OKC, OK
Default

Originally Posted by olderguy
In Peru, almost all middle class folk have live-in help. Not going to complain about the "Third World"
It was really meant to be a joke since most of the plebs think bourgeois means rich/super rich when it really means bored/materialistic members of the middle-class.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.