Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

I love my new 450/300 springs with 949 alignment

Old Feb 25, 2012 | 10:43 AM
  #1  
miatauser884's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default I love my new 450/300 springs with 949 alignment

I must have been riding on the bumpstops a lot over bumps with my FM springs.

Anyway, the ride is smoother with the new springs than it was with the old. I swapped my rear FM sway for a stock sway. New ride height is ~ 4.75"/5.0", and I had it aligned using the 949 racing alignment. The old ride height was on the order of 4.25/5. It was a pain for DD. I would scrape my driveway if not careful, scrape the front on dips in the road, hit the fender while turning at times, and I couldn't fit a jack under the car without lifting on the fender. (I know, I know, get a lower profile jack)

WOW, I think the car feels much more neutral now. It's much nicer to drive with the caster at 3.5 to 3.75. This time next week I'll be at the track. Can't Wait!

Alright, enough of this manliness, I'm going to go plant some rose bushes.
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 12:41 PM
  #2  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

what springs and alignment and ride height were prior vs now?


like before:

400/300
-1F -2R
12.5 FR

now:

450/300
-2F -1.5R
12.75" FR
Old Feb 26, 2012 | 11:38 AM
  #3  
miatauser884's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

Before:

342/228 (FM springs)
-2F -2R
4.25F/4.5R ( iirc 11.75F/12.0R)

caster was 5 (never again!)
1/16 total toe

Fm sways; F on front hole, R on rear hole

Now:

450/300
-2F -1.9R
4.75F/5.0R (~12.25/12.5)

caster ~3.5
toe: 0

Front FM sway on front hole, stock miata rear sway.
Old Feb 26, 2012 | 11:56 AM
  #4  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

I wasn't a huge fan of what putting a "matched set" of aftermarket sway bars did on the red car. Very tail-happy. Wound up running no rear bar, and a comparable front bar to yours.

On the blue car (no turbo) I have a stock rear bar hooked up, but otherwise the same setup. Both FM springs on FCM Bilsteins.

I'm curious as to your "never again" comment on front caster. This is one thing I've never really played with, apart from to tell the alignment tech to give me "as far positive as you can without sacrificing camber," which usually worked out to 4-5 degrees. Are you running a manual or de-powered steering rack?
Old Feb 26, 2012 | 07:20 PM
  #5  
miatauser884's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

"Tail happy" is exactly why I changed my suspension to what it is now.

I'm running a depowered rack. It was very heavy at 5 degrees, but after reading a bunch, a lot of people seem to like 3.5 degrees. I think that is was 949 recommends.

The difference between 5 degrees and 3.5 felt like I repowered the rack. I regretted depowering the rack after I had done it, but now I am happy again.
Old Feb 26, 2012 | 07:21 PM
  #6  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by djp0623
The difference between 5 degrees and 3.5 felt like I repowered the rack. I regretted depowering the rack after I had done it, but now I am happy again.
+1. I can tell within the first 1/8 mile whether a depowered car has been re-aligned appropriately or not. It makes a huge difference.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
emilio700
Wheels and Tires
151
Jun 2, 2017 02:36 PM
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
Apr 21, 2016 03:00 PM
shooterschmidty
Engine Performance
8
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 AM.