If no one minds me asking, why do we all use LC-1s?
10-17-2010, 11:49 PM
#21
Newb
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
Total Cats: 2
never had any luck with LC-1s. just had another one (1.1 firmware mind you) go out for lunch and never punch back in.
my techedge has never given me any problems. much more stable output vs the LC1 and same cheap sensor. I normally use 2J techedge units when the customer can wait, if we are in a hurry we usually just order up an LC1, and regret it later on.
my techedge has never given me any problems. much more stable output vs the LC1 and same cheap sensor. I normally use 2J techedge units when the customer can wait, if we are in a hurry we usually just order up an LC1, and regret it later on.
Last edited by sportage4x4; 10-17-2010 at 11:51 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply
0
0
10-18-2010, 02:05 AM
#24
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,976
Total Cats: 355
1) Fast reaction time
2) 2 programmable outputs
3) Digital connection to the PC to verify results
4) Gives out obvious error codes when something is wrong. Cable is broken/worn/cut? You'll get an error code. Sensor has gone bad or is overheating? You'll get an error code.
5) Can be daisy-chained to other Innovate dataloggers - in fact, I have 4 LC-1s and an LM-1 on my car (and a couple of other **** too - TC-4, LMA-2, LMA-3, DL-32, see my sig)
6) Cheap
7) Easy to install if you simply follow the instructions.
8) ACCURATE
2) 2 programmable outputs
3) Digital connection to the PC to verify results
4) Gives out obvious error codes when something is wrong. Cable is broken/worn/cut? You'll get an error code. Sensor has gone bad or is overheating? You'll get an error code.
5) Can be daisy-chained to other Innovate dataloggers - in fact, I have 4 LC-1s and an LM-1 on my car (and a couple of other **** too - TC-4, LMA-2, LMA-3, DL-32, see my sig)
6) Cheap
7) Easy to install if you simply follow the instructions.
8) ACCURATE
Reply
0
0
10-18-2010, 06:57 AM
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Naka, Japan & Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 128
Total Cats: 0
got a 14point7 on the way now. Sensor is $51 at advance auto parts, and with the P20 coupon the sensor picked up will be $30something dollars
# 20% off with code P20
# $25 off $60+ with code BIG25
# $30 off $75+ with code BIG30
# $50 off $200+ with code BIG50
# 20% off with code P20
# $25 off $60+ with code BIG25
# $30 off $75+ with code BIG30
# $50 off $200+ with code BIG50
Reply
0
0
10-18-2010, 11:38 AM
#28
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 1,361
Total Cats: 17
I bought the LC-1 mostly because it's cheap, accurate, fast, and has the dual programmable outputs. It's been on the car for 2.5 years and the only time it gave me trouble was when the display froze up from the sensor overheating during a track session. That's kind of my fault since I had it in the stock location in the OEM downpipe with no heat sink. When the turbo goes on it will be much farther downstream and will also have a copper plate heat sink, so I don't anticipate any trouble. I've been really happy with it overall.
Reply
0
0
10-19-2010, 11:27 AM
#37
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,892
Total Cats: 399
I run the non-gage type AEM on my miata (obviously communicates with my AEM EMS fine) and the gage type in my subaru (serial out communicates with romraider fine). Gage type is limited to displaying 11.0:1 max rich though, that sucks.
Reply
0
0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hot_Wheels
Local Meets, Events and Tech Days
2
09-24-2015 02:43 PM
SuperSneakySecretSquirrel
Meet and Greet
5
09-06-2015 08:30 PM
itsMikey
Insert BS here
0
09-05-2015 02:56 PM
