Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 869368)
14psi at 1800rpm is stupid. High cylinder pressure at low RPMs is incredibly hard on an engine. I guess since nobody expects a vw to run very long it's NBD.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Faeflora
(Post 869523)
You're gay. Combustion chamber psi is already at like 200psi before combustion.
|
Retune your forester on 87, report back with logs and gas mileage results.
I'll be here laughing at your dumb ass |
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 869368)
14psi at 1800rpm is stupid. High cylinder pressure at low RPMs is incredibly hard on an engine. I guess since nobody expects a vw to run very long it's NBD.
the mini is a little like that. i want to put a bigger snail on it. not much bigger, just one that spools above 2500. |
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 869368)
14psi at 1800rpm is stupid. High cylinder pressure at low RPMs is incredibly hard on an engine. I guess since nobody expects a vw to run very long it's NBD.
Originally Posted by GTI
(Post 869512)
As long as you do the maintenance the MKIV's last a very long time. I can't even count how many people I know over 200k on a stock block running twice the stock boost.
|
Originally Posted by viperormiata
(Post 869634)
Two of my close friends have 1.8t gti's. I hate driving them. One is a k03 @ 15psi and the other is a k04 @ 24psi. Driving around town is horrid in both cars. Boost comes on so fast that you roast 1st through 3rd just trying to get up to highway speed. I hate the stupid electronic throttle body that VW uses. Seriously, it's either none of it or ALL OF IT. No in between.
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: |
Originally Posted by viperormiata
(Post 869634)
I hate the stupid electronic throttle body that VW uses. Seriously, it's either none of it or ALL OF IT. No in between.
I agree completely about tinyturbo VWs. Neighbor has one, part throttle driving up the street he's at full boost before the car has traveled 10 feet. Not fun to drive. |
Friend just picked up a TDi and first time I rode in it I kept telling him to get his foot out of it. All I heard was turbo turbo turbo. Then he told me he was barely giving it any throttle.
|
In stock form it wont boost until half throttle, it only does half boost though. It wont do full boost until > 75% throttle.
|
In stock form, I actually liked my mom's 1.8t passat. It wasn't quick, but it had enough to keep me entertained, and their electronic boost control does a pretty good job making it feel like a bigger engine than it is.
|
Manufacturer recommended octane? Bitсh please, I built my engine, hence, I am the manufacturer.
|
Originally Posted by skidude
(Post 869887)
In stock form, I actually liked my mom's 1.8t passat.(...) their electronic boost control does a pretty good job making it feel like a bigger engine than it is.
|
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 869902)
If it's anything like the Volkswagen CC I drove a couple of years ago, it did in fact feel like it had a much bigger engine. Specifically, one of the coal-fired steam engines from the HMS Dreadnought. You request an increase in throttle, and then some period of time later the engine room responds and you begin to accelerate.
|
Funny how perceptions are different: some people complaining about spool up being too quick and Joe complaining about lag.
|
/\ beat me to it. +1
This thread makes me laugh. Just about everyone on here is rocking a 2554 or 2560 turbo because they want as much torque under curve as they can get, then we talk about a car that makes ALL of it under the curve, and suddenly everyone hates it. There is no winning. (though I think Joe was talking about transient throttle response not lag) |
Originally Posted by viperormiata
(Post 869634)
Two of my close friends have 1.8t gti's. I hate driving them. One is a k03 @ 15psi and the other is a k04 @ 24psi. Driving around town is horrid in both cars. Boost comes on so fast that you roast 1st through 3rd just trying to get up to highway speed. I hate the stupid electronic throttle body that VW uses. Seriously, it's either none of it or ALL OF IT. No in between.
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: If I could set it up to work properly, I would have anti lag running during cruise. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 870308)
(though I think Joe was talking about transient throttle response not lag)
Very annoying, and very uncivilized in what otherwise appeared to be a highly refined and costly sedan. This was a Euro-spec diesel, so maybe the US-spec petrol cars are different. I've not driven one here in the states. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 870308)
Just about everyone on here is rocking a 2554 or 2560 turbo because they want as much torque under curve as they can get, then we talk about a car that makes ALL of it under the curve, and suddenly everyone hates it. There is no winning.
of all if means a realistic rev limiter :) |
drive by wire is a magnificent thing when you're able to adjust/tune it.
on 32bit ecu subarus its a map with rpm and throttle angle on the axis and requested torque as the values in the cells. PURE GENIOUS. tune it to your liking and you get even laggy un-responsive subaru's to react to your inputs almost like a high strung honda. seriously impressive. wish you were closer to us Joe so you could drive my forester. I think you'd be impressed. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 870358)
I live my life 0-4000RPM at a time....
of all if means a realistic rev limiter :) But my response is: I make 200wtq before 3k rpm, your argument is invalid. COME AT ME BRO:party: |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands