BatMoWheel turbos have arrived
#1
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,668
Total Cats: 3,015
BatMoWheel turbos have arrived
This is called the BatMoWheel by Bullseye Power:
The thread:
http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...wer-Batmowheel
The thread:
http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...wer-Batmowheel
#4
"Bullseye Power - Batmowheel
Bullseye Power just introduced it's new wheel design, the Batmowheel. The idea is that the blade design should have more surface area than the straight blade version. For example, the 66mm compressor wheel would have the same surface area as a 71mm. "
"For comparison, GE has been using the same design wheel in their jet engines and continues to do so with their GEnx engines.
Skip to 0:49 to hear them talk about the blade design."
Last edited by viperormiata; 04-14-2011 at 10:08 PM.
#11
Sounds like a marketing gimmick to me since they really tell you nothing technical.
Fan sections in your average hi-bypass passenger airliner engine turn at around 2500-3000rpm. I'm sure the aero principles translate directly to a turbocharger spinning at 130,000 rpm. It's not that big of a difference.
Fan sections in your average hi-bypass passenger airliner engine turn at around 2500-3000rpm. I'm sure the aero principles translate directly to a turbocharger spinning at 130,000 rpm. It's not that big of a difference.
#15
Better than Garrett GTX??
http://www.motoiq.com/magazine_artic...ochargers.aspx
Looks like similar sort of fin design...
http://www.motoiq.com/magazine_artic...ochargers.aspx
Looks like similar sort of fin design...
#16
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
Look fellas it's not revolutionary but overall the design can flow more than a standard wheel without the comprimised spool of a larger mm regular sized wheel. 5-10% is not that much but it is still more flow.
Seriously, this is totally irrelevant to the MT.net community. Few people here are maxing out their turbos. ALSO These turbos won't even come in T3 frame so just forget about ever running one on your miata.
I did look at this **** last night before I bought my T4 66mm standard wheel borg turbo. I didn't get a batmowheel because of a) cost-- I paid $700 for my turbo and this **** would have cost over $1400 and b) Although I would like a lighter billet wheel compressor, my plan is to spray water in it so I want something that's cheap to replace. I'm hoping pre-compressor WI will do much more than a billet wheel when it comes to spool.
Seriously, this is totally irrelevant to the MT.net community. Few people here are maxing out their turbos. ALSO These turbos won't even come in T3 frame so just forget about ever running one on your miata.
I did look at this **** last night before I bought my T4 66mm standard wheel borg turbo. I didn't get a batmowheel because of a) cost-- I paid $700 for my turbo and this **** would have cost over $1400 and b) Although I would like a lighter billet wheel compressor, my plan is to spray water in it so I want something that's cheap to replace. I'm hoping pre-compressor WI will do much more than a billet wheel when it comes to spool.
#17
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
Better than Garrett GTX??
http://www.motoiq.com/magazine_artic...ochargers.aspx
Looks like similar sort of fin design...
http://www.motoiq.com/magazine_artic...ochargers.aspx
Looks like similar sort of fin design...
#19
I'd love to know specifically how the wavy compressor wheel works better than a straight or curved wheel. The quip about "increased surface area" doesn't add up. How come airplane propellers aren't designed with a wave? There are curved blades on aircraft, but no waves. I'm just saying that if there was some solid engineering data behind it, they should be willing to at least explain it to the consumer. Increasing the surface area of the leading edge of the blade does not directly translate into more air being compressed.
I'm calling bullshit without a hard technical explanation.
#20
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,902
Total Cats: 399
Sounds like a marketing gimmick to me since they really tell you nothing technical.
Fan sections in your average hi-bypass passenger airliner engine turn at around 2500-3000rpm. I'm sure the aero principles translate directly to a turbocharger spinning at 130,000 rpm. It's not that big of a difference.
Fan sections in your average hi-bypass passenger airliner engine turn at around 2500-3000rpm. I'm sure the aero principles translate directly to a turbocharger spinning at 130,000 rpm. It's not that big of a difference.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post