What is the best proof that a little H2 generator will not get you better MPGs?
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pikeville, TN
Posts: 3,038
Total Cats: 27
What is the best proof that a little H2 generator will not get you better MPGs?
I am getting tired of seeing people post that you can make some H2/O2 bubbles in a mayonnaise jar while driving down the road and get an extra 5 MPG. Anyone know of a good site that explains/proves why this is completed BS?
#5
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,593
That's right, America. Hydrogen is a fossil fuel.
Of course, these claims could just be a conspiracy forced on us by the cabal which consists of the oil companies, the automakers, and the republican party.
Perhaps Hyper can explain to us why it is, in fact, not true.
#7
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Yah, this is low level chemistry.
There are several big holes
1) Like mentioned above, the electrical energy required to form the hydrogen/oxygen from water will be significant more than the energy extracted from combusting the hydrogen. As there will be large efficiency losses.
2) The energy available in hydrogen is pretty small, even at fairly high pressures it will take a pretty big volume to keep a car driving for very long.
My conspiracy theory with this issue is that all the driveable hydrogen concept cars are SUVs and big cars, which I believe is because the backs of said vehicles contain very large storage tanks. But I could be wrong, I havent calculated how much hydrogen it would take to take a car through 100 miles of city driving, but it should be a lot.
There are several big holes
1) Like mentioned above, the electrical energy required to form the hydrogen/oxygen from water will be significant more than the energy extracted from combusting the hydrogen. As there will be large efficiency losses.
2) The energy available in hydrogen is pretty small, even at fairly high pressures it will take a pretty big volume to keep a car driving for very long.
My conspiracy theory with this issue is that all the driveable hydrogen concept cars are SUVs and big cars, which I believe is because the backs of said vehicles contain very large storage tanks. But I could be wrong, I havent calculated how much hydrogen it would take to take a car through 100 miles of city driving, but it should be a lot.
#8
BMW did a 7 series powered by H2. 260HP V12. Kinda cool.
It has a tank that takes up almost all of the trunk and if you put a snowball in it it will take 13 years for it to melt. No joke.
Hydrogen generation by means of a mason jar of water with baking soda in it and a wire off the alternator is however.
Nail on head folks. It takes more drag off the alternator making th H2 than you get from it. By a lot. That either the 1st or 2nd law of thermo as I recall. IIRC they have not succefully broken that yet.
It has a tank that takes up almost all of the trunk and if you put a snowball in it it will take 13 years for it to melt. No joke.
Hydrogen generation by means of a mason jar of water with baking soda in it and a wire off the alternator is however.
Nail on head folks. It takes more drag off the alternator making th H2 than you get from it. By a lot. That either the 1st or 2nd law of thermo as I recall. IIRC they have not succefully broken that yet.
#13
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pikeville, TN
Posts: 3,038
Total Cats: 27
Anyway, I have to ask again. Anyone have link to a site that says the HHO is BS? My attempts at posting that "this is BS and won't work because..." doesn't fly when you are arguing with idiots. I need some video of Steven Hawking saying you are screwed up in the head if you believe this.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post