Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

New car quarter mile times, WTF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #1  
rotaryjunky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 900
Total Cats: 0
From: Northern Michigan
Default New car quarter mile times, WTF?

Is this the sign of the new car quarter mile apocolypse or something?

April 08 Motortrend:

Charger R/T 14.1
G8 GT 13.8
Roush stage 2 mustang 13.8
Saleen S281-3V 13.7
Shelby GT-C 13.8
Accord coupe EX-L 14.0
Eclipse GT 14.3
Altima coupe 3.5 se 14.3
06 EVO MR 13.5
Toyota Sequoia 14.7

Is it me, or do these numbers seem too close for the variety of vehicles? I know, one second in the quarter mile is a decent gap, but any of these vehicles could beat any other in a drag. Hell, I lost to a 500+hp EVO by .01 seconds in the eighth because he bogged it and missed second.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 01:57 AM
  #2  
kenzo42's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,017
Total Cats: 13
From: CA
Default

An accord is almost a 13 sec car?!

It's sad knowing that when I turbo the NA, it'll still probably be slower than alot of these family cars.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 02:27 AM
  #3  
LateralSpeed's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 0
From: Florida
Default

The accord is not close to a 13 second car. I used to sell them and these numbers are very optimistic, it's closer to a high 14's car in real life. 14.5 here and as I said, very optimistic. http://www.modernracer.com/hondaaccordexcoupe.html
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 09:17 AM
  #4  
rotaryjunky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 900
Total Cats: 0
From: Northern Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by kenzo42
An accord is almost a 13 sec car?!

It's sad knowing that when I turbo the NA, it'll still probably be slower than alot of these family cars.
These times are almost always a second or more slower in real life without all the corrections, etc.. And which would you actually want to drive, anyways!?

But, the accord has 268 hp now.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 09:19 AM
  #5  
rotaryjunky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 900
Total Cats: 0
From: Northern Michigan
Default

Although those times seem very slow for those mustangs, considering they dynoed them to verify the power.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 11:06 AM
  #6  
Arkmage's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,895
Total Cats: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

"Roush stage 2 mustang 13.8"

I don't know how much agree with these numbers. The roush stage 2 for example. 13.8 sec. The 06-07 GT runs 13.6 if you got the 5 speed. So the new roush stage 2 is SLOWER THAN THE PREVIOUS YEAR BASE GT? WTF?
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 11:50 AM
  #7  
chriscar's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,709
Total Cats: 16
From: Carrollton TX
Default

The Stage 2 adds handling & cosmetics only, no power mods.

C
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #8  
Doppelgänger's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,850
Total Cats: 71
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Those times have to be far wrong. I had a run-in with a new Altima coupe last night (V6)... and i totally DUSTED his ***...from a roll.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #9  
l_bader's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 771
Total Cats: 1
From: Alamo City, Tejas
Default

Unless properly configured for a drag strip, the 'Stangs have had a serious problem hooking up and getting decent 60-ft times; more so with the current design.

I was at the Fun Ford Weekend in Houston a little over a year ago and the S/C'd Saleens were averaging high 14s and the (mostly) stock GTs were dialing low- to mid 15s.

- L
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #10  
rotaryjunky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 900
Total Cats: 0
From: Northern Michigan
Default

The new GT stangs (mods!?) run high 8s in the eighth, V6 with exhaust runs a 10 flat everytime. I can't wait to beat one of the GTs this summer. They act way too cool.

How are we supposed to compare cars when these magazines are wack!?
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 03:13 PM
  #11  
rotaryjunky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 900
Total Cats: 0
From: Northern Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by l_bader
Unless properly configured for a drag strip, the 'Stangs have had a serious problem hooking up and getting decent 60-ft times; more so with the current design.
- L
Probably the stiffer suspensions. At least they sure handle better.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tekel
Cars for sale/trade
29
Feb 5, 2016 04:16 PM
leatherface24
Cars for sale/trade
15
Oct 16, 2015 11:35 AM
pineda92
Meet and Greet
4
Sep 20, 2015 09:22 PM
cheeseclock
Meet and Greet
15
Sep 12, 2015 08:53 AM
Braineack
Cars for sale/trade
3
Sep 4, 2015 02:12 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 PM.