The AI-generated cat pictures thread
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 3,214
Total Cats: 1,687
I am sick of idiots videoing in portrait mode, missing two thirds of what could have been "framed" and then shaking the thing side to side to capture what they otherwise would have on their damn screen already.
I wonder if they have their TVs in portrait mode at home, too...
I wonder if they have their TVs in portrait mode at home, too...
Portrait mode vs landscape mode argument isn't completely a bad thing - it makes it easy to judge the average intelligence of the videographer which allows for a more accurate assessment of the portrayed situation.
I'll be honest; sometimes I'll use portrait mode, but normally only for still photos of a single individual... ;-)
I'll be honest; sometimes I'll use portrait mode, but normally only for still photos of a single individual... ;-)
Cars and Candy:
I came up with the comment an hour after posting that picture. Damn my lightning wit.
I came up with the comment an hour after posting that picture. Damn my lightning wit.
Last edited by czubaka; 11-02-2016 at 02:03 PM. Reason: I make funny.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,052
Total Cats: 6,615
I assume you mean the image sensor, and not the accelerometer / position sensor?
The image sensors used in modern smartphones aren't built to the same fixed aspect ratio as those found in things like video cameras (natively 16:9) or DSLR cameras (natively 3:2). Because the phone designers expect the user to hold the phone in both portrait and landscape orientations, the sensors are practically square, and the phone's software simply crops the image differently depending upon the orientation.
It would, in theory, be a relatively trivial matter to design the software to force landscape mode regardless of orientation, or to capture all of the pixels and allow the image to be cropped later, but to my knowledge, none offer this feature.
Old-school color TV camera cable. This sucker is an inch and a half thick, and about as flexible as Rush Limbaugh's political views.
The image sensors used in modern smartphones aren't built to the same fixed aspect ratio as those found in things like video cameras (natively 16:9) or DSLR cameras (natively 3:2). Because the phone designers expect the user to hold the phone in both portrait and landscape orientations, the sensors are practically square, and the phone's software simply crops the image differently depending upon the orientation.
It would, in theory, be a relatively trivial matter to design the software to force landscape mode regardless of orientation, or to capture all of the pixels and allow the image to be cropped later, but to my knowledge, none offer this feature.
Old-school color TV camera cable. This sucker is an inch and a half thick, and about as flexible as Rush Limbaugh's political views.
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
What you dont realize is how many people literally use a phone more than a computer. I hate it, but there are a ton of people who do everything on a phone. My fiance rarely is on her computer. Only for document creation and whatnot.
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,079
then dont get me started on how many apps still require two hands to operate...and menu bars on the top of the screen. it's ******* infuriating that people design phone-apps like a moused-based web-browser.
i shouldnt need to use my pointer finger to drag thing down from the top of an enormous screen -- i shoudl be able to access most things with my thumb near the bottom...
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,052
Total Cats: 6,615
Why do you hate white people, Brainey?
Also, The Simpsons predicted 9/11.