Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Twins Turbo "get's it"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #21  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

What does "get's it" mean, and who is being quoted?
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:06 AM
  #22  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
I've been throwing the idea into Andrews head but it really isn't needed on the BP.
Oh. I didn't realize our stock oil pump/system was fine on the track and crankcase vacuum doesn't matter.

I hear ya though, if it ain't broke don't fix it right
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:20 AM
  #23  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
What does "get's it" mean, and who is being quoted?
get it in the butt
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #24  
Cococarbine3's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 601
Total Cats: 0
From: Batavia, IL
Default

Speaking of dry sumps, do want:
Name:  IMG_0231enginerhs.jpg
Views: 49
Size:  39.1 KB
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #25  
miata2fast's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,145
Total Cats: 175
From: Dover, FL
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
So who's going to be the first of us to run a dry sump?
ME ME ME ME........Well probably not. Price made my butt pucker.
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 10:59 PM
  #26  
Sam TII's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 279
Total Cats: 4
Default

Then there is this:

http://speedhunters.com/media/p/147644.aspx

I haven't found any additional info on it yet, but you could swallow a few kids with those intake pipes/turbos.
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:03 PM
  #27  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:12 PM
  #28  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Sam TII
Then there is this:

http://speedhunters.com/media/p/147644.aspx

I haven't found any additional info on it yet, but you could swallow a few kids with those intake pipes/turbos.
There's plenty of great build photos on twins turbo's site on that viper. I really like the way they build the intake manifold runners, and they even did a dual plenum style inlet to the intercooler, with home made dome end caps...slick!









Haha!
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:17 PM
  #29  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

n00bish off topic question, but: what is the benefit from these "dual plenum" end tanks and intake manifolds? I remember in some thread there was a discussion on this but forget which
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:24 PM
  #30  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

I'd imagine a better/more even flow distribution across the core (or second plenum in the case of an intake manifold).

Is what twinsturbo fabbed significantly better than just having typical tapered endtanks? I dunno. Looks more trick. Probably something the other turbo vipers don't have which is generally very important to that type of customer.
Old Nov 17, 2010 | 07:43 AM
  #31  
hustler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
Probably something the other turbo vipers don't have which is generally very important to that type of customer.
lol @ protouring bottoms
Old Nov 20, 2010 | 11:31 PM
  #32  
soflarick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 884
Total Cats: 0
From: Floriduh
Default

When the hell did Hustler become a mod?
Old Nov 20, 2010 | 11:56 PM
  #33  
jasonb's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 413
Total Cats: 2
From: onion city,ca
Default

where is the expense in dry sump? the pump? i'm thinking used circle track/dirt track pumps... IE: http://www.racingjunk.com/category/1...em.html?page=1

pan is 600ish from are. then u just need adapter to block and a oil can + lines?
Old Nov 20, 2010 | 11:59 PM
  #34  
Nagase's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,805
Total Cats: 2
Default

Complete system here:

http://www.moroso.com/articles/artic...mpSystems.html

Another pic:


Last edited by Nagase; Nov 21, 2010 at 12:15 AM.
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 02:47 AM
  #35  
Rennkafer's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
From: Port Orchard, WA
Default

Originally Posted by jasonb
where is the expense in dry sump? the pump? i'm thinking used circle track/dirt track pumps... IE: http://www.racingjunk.com/category/1...em.html?page=1

pan is 600ish from are. then u just need adapter to block and a oil can + lines?
Biggest ticket items are the pump, pan, drive hardware, and lines. I'd be wary of used pumps unless you know the guy selling personally. The reason a fair number of those pumps are for sale is because they ingested engine bits. Parts for the pumps are expensive.

Oh, and the system in the OP is a 5 stage (4 scavenge, 1 pressure stage), which is complete overkill. We typically use 3 stage systems on most cars, a couple of the big Can-Am engines are 4 stage (500+ cid BBC's) and they provide more than adequate oiling.

While the systems are expensive, I think a BP would benefit personally.
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 02:53 AM
  #36  
Nagase's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,805
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Rennkafer
While the systems are expensive, I think a BP would benefit personally.
Can you think of any engine that wouldn't get /some/ benefit from it? I don't think that's being argued. We're just very very cheap here and proud of it.
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 12:09 PM
  #37  
Rennkafer's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
From: Port Orchard, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Nagase
Can you think of any engine that wouldn't get /some/ benefit from it? I don't think that's being argued. We're just very very cheap here and proud of it.
Actually up further in the thread someone said they didn't think the BP would benefit.

I know people here can be cheap sometimes and for street driven engines a dry sump makes no sense... but when you spend $4-5k on an engine, then run it as hard on track as a few here do it starts making more sense. While the dry sump system is expensive, you will be saving some money in other areas. No need for billet oil pump gears, accusumps, pan baffling, all of which people spend money on in search of good oil control.
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 12:56 PM
  #38  
crashnscar's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Originally Posted by Rennkafer
Actually up further in the thread someone said they didn't think the BP would benefit.

I know people here can be cheap sometimes and for street driven engines a dry sump makes no sense... but when you spend $4-5k on an engine, then run it as hard on track as a few here do it starts making more sense. While the dry sump system is expensive, you will be saving some money in other areas. No need for billet oil pump gears, accusumps, pan baffling, all of which people spend money on in search of good oil control.
I wasn't saying the BP won't benefit.... of course just about any engine would benefit.
What I meant is that the BP doesn't have oiling issues like some other motors do. For example, LS motors require either an accusump or dry sump for track usage. If you don't have either of these (even with extra baffling added to the pan like this http://www.improvedracing.com/produc...products_id=30), you will have low oil pressure and starve the motor on track in high speed left hand sweepers. The BP does not have a problem with oiling like that; no extra sump baffling or accusump is required to maintain oil pressure on track (with the exception of a split second while braking).
That being said, any engine will benefit from having a vacuum in the crankcase and freeing up a little power.
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 01:49 PM
  #39  
Rennkafer's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
From: Port Orchard, WA
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
The BP does not have a problem with oiling like that; no extra sump baffling or accusump is required to maintain oil pressure on track (with the exception of a split second while braking).
That being said, any engine will benefit from having a vacuum in the crankcase and freeing up a little power.
I'd gotten the impression from Andrew that there was more than a split second of low pressure under braking... but that might just have been my misunderstanding. Might be worth datalogging to see just how low it gets and how long it stays that way if you haven't already.

Having the vacuum in the crankcase helps with blowby too... shouldn't fill the catch can quite as much.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
cale saurage
DIY Turbo Discussion
16
Oct 1, 2015 11:25 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 AM.