Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Unmanned SUV ridiculous NASA relevance debate thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 01:55 PM
  #81  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by ThatGuy85
Cost to put a highly sophisticated robot on mars: 2.5 billion.

TSA Budget for 2012: 7.85 Billion.

There are many other areas where we should be complaining about spending vs benefit to mankind before NASA.
This is one of the few areas I am completely ok with government spending money. I am a full blown anarchist and think the governments should be disbanded, but as long as we have one, funding NASA is one thing I will never have a problem with.

Originally Posted by y8s
having a mars rover cup your *****? priceless.
I am flying for a business trip next week. If I could just have a mars rover cup my ***** I would instead of what ever guy is going to do it.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 02:16 PM
  #82  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Have I already mentioned what a stupid fucking thread this is?
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 02:20 PM
  #83  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Have I already mentioned what a stupid fucking thread this is?
No. How ------- stupid is it?
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 02:22 PM
  #84  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
Imagine if some of the great explorers, philosophers and inventors of the last several centuries took that kind of asinine stance.
I don't have to.



If you don't think that scientific advancement is worth spending money on, you're probably not intelligent enough to understand the benefits that scientific advancement brings.
Attached Thumbnails Unmanned SUV ridiculous NASA relevance debate thread-darkages.gif  
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 02:24 PM
  #85  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
No. How ------- stupid is it?
I would rather watch an entire season of TLC's "Here Comes Honey Boo Boo" back to back than read this atrocious, insulting train wreck of a thread again.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 02:28 PM
  #86  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
If you don't think that scientific advancement is worth spending money on, you're probably not intelligent enough to understand the benefits that scientific advancement brings.
If that's what you think is being debated, then you're probably not intelligent to participate in the discussion anyway.


EDIT: I'm leaving comment up, because I don't like ninja edits, but I regret posting it. It's over the line and I was just being a smartass.

But seriously, is that really what you think is being debated? Is that the full complexity of your argument? Science is good, therefore spending on it is justified. No consideration of what it costs? The short-term benefits? The long-term benefits? The opportunity cost of not using that money elsewhere? The debate between private and public funding? ANYTHING at all?

Healthcare is good, therefore spending on it is justified.
Education is good, therefore spending on it is justified.
Roads are good, therefore spending on it is justified.
Food is good, therefore spending on it is justified.
Etc.

There's no nuance there at all. It's not saying anything useful. They are empty statements. And shouting down anyone who questions whether NASA is worth the cost or not (or whether it's the best approach to scientific research) isn't an argument, it's just groupthink.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 03:08 PM
  #87  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
Is that the full complexity of your argument? Science is good, therefore spending on it is justified. No consideration of what it costs? The short-term benefits? The long-term benefits? The opportunity cost of not using that money elsewhere? The debate between private and public funding? ANYTHING at all?
You want complexity? Bold is mine.

Healthcare is good, therefore spending on it is justified. $846 billion in FY2012.
Education is good, therefore spending on it is justified. $153 billion in FY2012.
Roads are good, therefore spending on it is justified. $103 billion in FY2012.
Food is good, therefore spending on it is justified. $113 billion for food/nutrition assistance in FY2012
Etc.
We spend $8.3 billion dollars a year on ------- prisons, and $4.5 billion dollars a year on congressional salary, expenses, and maintenance of legislative buildings - and you're seriously going to bitch and moan about $2.5 billion ONE TIME to go to ------- Mars?

Opportunity cost indeed.



e: budget source: http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/...71_801#usgs302
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 03:16 PM
  #88  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
you're seriously going to bitch and moan about $2.5 billion ONE TIME to go to ------- Mars?
No, I'm going to "bitch and moan" when people claim that NASA should be funded without question or debate, and try to shout down anyone that dares challenge their opinion.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 05:59 PM
  #89  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
No, I'm going to "bitch and moan" when people claim that NASA should be funded without question or debate, and try to shout down anyone that dares challenge their opinion.
I've yet to see any reasonable debate. All I see is one guy complaining because he personally has not seen the tangible, immediate, short-term benefits from every NASA mission ever executed. Forgive me for thinking that's not an argument worth rebutting.

e: I'm not referring to you, mgeoffriau.
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 02:18 PM
  #90  
jacob300zx's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,211
Total Cats: 151
From: Houston, TX
Default

Its in our nature to be explorers. Beyond this discussion 90% of the population would choose to fund NASA or any kind of exploration. I'm always 100% in for any project that gains us knowledge. If you guys think we are the only ones in this universe your idiots.

How Big Is Earth Compared to the Universe?
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 03:54 PM
  #91  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

Gargantuan image that is on-topic to the original post:

Click for full size infographic

Old Aug 10, 2012 | 05:23 PM
  #92  
fooger03's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,149
Total Cats: 230
From: Columbus, OH
Default

AH HA!!!

Rover is the precursor to post-modern nuclear powered transportation!!!!
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 11:06 PM
  #93  
Sparetire's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
From: Colorado
Default

WTF do people think they did? Ship 2.5 billion in ones to Mars and wait for strippers to find a way to get there? Did all the cash simply evaporate when it went to NASA never to be seen or exchanged again? Did JPL get all parts an labor for free while lighting stogies with Franklins? ****. That cash went to high-end industries that employ valuble people who go forth and actually ******* get **** done for a living. No wonder people are bitter. That kind of **** is considered evil now. How insensitive to turn a decent paycheck while using your brain and science to attain a goal.
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 11:26 PM
  #94  
wannafbody's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default

I think the waste was in not sending congress to Mars
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 02:34 PM
  #95  
blaen99's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Decided to revive this thread for one reason...

wtfnasa?

Here's wtf NASA has done for you.
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 08:08 PM
  #96  
2ndGearRubber's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,183
Total Cats: 18
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

And NONE of that could have been done by ANYONE else, except NASA. Only NASA can do R&D work, no one else.


Oh, and LOL at lightweight wheel chairs. Crippled autox anyone?
Reply
Leave a poscat -2 Leave a negcat
Old Aug 18, 2012 | 01:07 PM
  #97  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by 2ndGearRubber
And NONE of that could have been done by ANYONE else, except NASA. Only NASA can do R&D work, no one else.


Oh, and LOL at lightweight wheel chairs. Crippled autox anyone?
That's not the point. They DID do it. If you are proposing privatizing space exploration, I'm all for that. But as usual, I have no idea what you are really proposing or talking about.

I'm highly irritated by people at work who had no idea what Curiosity was, and that we had an SUV sized rover on Mars. People should be ******* blown away by the fact that we as humans have such objects on other planets, exploring and conducting science experiments all automatically. Instead people would rather watch their favorite retarded reality show and live in their own little pointless box of a universe that they have made themselves. I guess that is their right to do so, but goddamn it irritates me that people have no interest in such things.
Old Aug 18, 2012 | 01:12 PM
  #98  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
I think the waste was in not sending congress to Mars
Old Aug 18, 2012 | 01:20 PM
  #99  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 2ndGearRubber
Oh, and LOL at lightweight wheel chairs. Crippled autox anyone?
Is anyone else incredibly offended by this remark?
Old Aug 18, 2012 | 01:26 PM
  #100  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Is anyone else incredibly offended by this remark?
No more so than the constant pedophilia jokes on this forum.

Attached Thumbnails Unmanned SUV ridiculous NASA relevance debate thread-bs16.jpg  



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 PM.