Originally Posted by nester
(Post 224649)
depending on the year of the 626, i know some of them were FWD. We had one we used as a battling ram.. best/worst $100 ever spent.
cressida was low 20's at best. we had one from 86 to 99.. great car. We had one as a family car growing up. Let me just say that Automatic + Torque + Minnesota Snow = Suck. Even slight inclines were terrible. Beyond that, very nice car. |
Yeah, it wasn't that great in the snow, unless you were trying to have fun, as opposed to trying to get somewhere. ;)
|
Originally Posted by nester
(Post 224649)
depending on the year of the 626, i know some of them were FWD. We had one we used as a battling ram.. best/worst $100 ever spent.
cressida was low 20's at best. we had one from 86 to 99.. great car. |
i don't think rwd sedan and fuel efficient really go together. unless you're willing to pay for a high dollar sedan (bmw).
|
Originally Posted by TonyC
(Post 223977)
new, used, doesn't matter. cressidas were great when i drove one, but that straight6 was nowhere near fuel efficient.
reading this thread makes me depressed. basically the answer is: you're SOL. |
AE86. I have a bunch of them. I bought them when they were cheap as hell, before demand went crazy. Oh no, wait a minute, I blew the money on chicks and beer. And my Boss offered to sell me his ($1500) a million years ago and I didn't cause I wanted an rx7. Oops.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:59 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands