Notices
Media Got any pics or vids to share?

youtube: Skyactiv explained

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 18, 2012 | 10:06 PM
  #41  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
what you havent taken 3,000psi worth of fuel to the fingers/face?
The standard medical treatment for accidental subcutaneous injection of fuel to the arm or hand is amputation in roughly 50% of cases.
Old Jun 18, 2012 | 10:06 PM
  #42  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Where is the V6 CX-9 diesel that I can easily tow my track car with? Compete with the Explorer, and crush it.
Old Jun 18, 2012 | 10:45 PM
  #43  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
Your options were an awesome looking, small SUV or the ugliest pug-nose car on the market, lol. The Mini is also nowhere near reliable.
so far it's great. i have a warranty. and in spite of realiability, the resale on the mini is about double the mazda.

Originally Posted by hustler
Well...the diesel may change cars if the EPA doesn't get involved.
bad news for you on that front. the part of the WHO called "The International Agency for Research on Cancer" just reclassified diesel emissions as carcinogenic. like 2nd hand smoke.

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/...,7726895.story
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 12:08 AM
  #44  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
so far it's great. i have a warranty. and in spite of realiability, the resale on the mini is about double the mazda.



bad news for you on that front. the part of the WHO called "The International Agency for Research on Cancer" just reclassified diesel emissions as carcinogenic. like 2nd hand smoke.

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/...,7726895.story
The GOP can write the wrongs of the WHO.
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 01:38 AM
  #45  
ScottFW's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,361
Total Cats: 17
From: Falls Church, VA
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
bad news for you on that front. the part of the WHO called "The International Agency for Research on Cancer" just reclassified diesel emissions as carcinogenic. like 2nd hand smoke.

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-diesel-engine-exhaust-linked-with-risk-of-lung-cancer-20120612,0,7726895.story
Alarmist garbage. If the International Agency for Research on Cancer is "the world’s most prestigious cancer research group" as asserted, how is it that I have been an oncology researcher for 13 years and never heard of them until now? Granted, I'm not on the environmental epidemiology side of things, but I do read and "world's most prestigious" is more than stretching it. From what I can tell they are neither a major regulatory agency nor a funding agency, so their findings are of limited impact.

Their list of "Category 1 (confirmed) carcinogens" also includes birth control pills, which do in fact increase cancer risk, yet millions of women are allowed to swallow this horrendous poison to murder babies every day! Don't ever go outside without slathering yourself in SPF 90 because UV radiation is also on their list. Also, ethanol. Sonofabitch, it looks like I have to stop drinking beer. We're not just talking about a little cirrhosis here. It's CANCER.

There's some pretty nasty ---- in Category 1 though. High risk but obscure chemicals, some radioisotopes, etc. That it took so long for them to reach a conclusion regarding diesel particulates, which are ubiquitous and inhaled at low levels by a few hundred million people, is a good indicator that it's not that hazardous for the population at large. They relied entirely on one study of heavily exposed miners who were breathing diesel soot in confined underground spaces 40 hours a week for 5+ years. The IARC glosses over that little detail and the L.A. Times ignored it completely while insinuating that the general public should be concerned about truck exhaust as they cruise down the highway. Absolute garbage.
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 08:20 AM
  #46  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Dear mt.net,

everything causes cancer. humans ARE cancer.

Love, Brain.
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 08:36 AM
  #47  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I find it kinda funny: after reading this thread at work yesterday I stop by our shop on the way home and my dad has a 2007 Mazda3 with an engine that just "stopped working" after like 50k of regular driving.

We've still no idea why it just up and died, but a compression test pretty much says its toast.
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 10:36 AM
  #48  
Saml01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

I leased a 2012 Mazda 3 Skyactiv I Touring for my wife. Overall we can't complain. Great fuel economy. Transmission shifts fast and smooth. Fuel economy is on the money. Drives nice and handles really good. Its a little cramped up front for me but perfect for her. I also find the cloth seats about as comfortable as a medieval torture device on long drives. Its a bit gutless from a stop, but not too terrible once its moving. Overall its a great little commuter car. Best of all the lease and insurance is cheap, so piece of mind for me since she doesnt have to drive a used car.

She wants the CX-5 now so will probably pick that up once the lease is up or do an early swap depending on the terms.
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 11:35 AM
  #49  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by ScottFW
Alarmist garbage.
I don't doubt that for a second. I just heard/read it. And I'm sure someone else did too. And I'm sure they will call the EPA and ruin Hustler's plans for a diesel CX-5.

I know there was research into some developing countries with respect to the GRADE of diesel they use having much worse particulate and other emissions and the vehicles have little to no emissions controls anyway.
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 11:53 AM
  #50  
jeff_man's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,006
Total Cats: 103
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

Good chance I will trade my 2012 golf tdi for a 2014 mazda skydrive tdi.
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 01:59 PM
  #51  
ScottFW's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,361
Total Cats: 17
From: Falls Church, VA
Default

^^^ My father bought a 2012 Passat TDI with the DSG. He sees upper-40s highway mpg which is significantly better than its EPA rating.
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 02:31 PM
  #52  
jeff_man's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,006
Total Cats: 103
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by ScottFW
^^^ My father bought a 2012 Passat TDI with the DSG. He sees upper-40s highway mpg which is significantly better than its EPA rating.
ECU is telling me 41.2 mpg over 6k miles. Waiting till the ECU is cracked so I can chip and straight pipe from the dpf.

Didn't do dsg because they cost a butt load to fix and you have to pay $500 more to chip the auto and it really don't work well =/
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 04:18 PM
  #53  
thasac's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 811
Total Cats: 44
From: Mass.
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I find it kinda funny: after reading this thread at work yesterday I stop by our shop on the way home and my dad has a 2007 Mazda3 with an engine that just "stopped working" after like 50k of regular driving.

We've still no idea why it just up and died, but a compression test pretty much says its toast.
...and this is why I sold mine at 55k. It's not exactly a package designed for longevity, especially running 21-22 psi as I was.

Also, I'm not sure while so many of you are getting your panties in a twist over 3000 psi of fuel pressure. As others have stated, it's been done in the diesel world for decades now and is also very common in modern direct injection engines. My 'Speed 3 would run at 1600-1800 psi under boost ... they use a mechanical pump off the block to bump pressure so only a foot or so of hard line is actually seeing 3000 psi. I assume the line off the tank is seeing 'standards' fuel pressures.

-Zach
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 03:27 AM
  #54  
sturovo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 507
Total Cats: 75
From: Martin, Slovakia
Default

Skyactive diesel, 14.0:1 compression, aluminium block
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 03:59 AM
  #55  
cpolly69's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 258
Total Cats: 4
From: Columbus Ohio
Default

noticed the comments early on about the di pressures -
the speed 3/6 cx7 used di back in 07 - those engines idled at about 1k psi and did sustained 1700-1900 at wot -
modded hpfp would let you keep close to 2k at wot
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 06:36 AM
  #56  
lassi's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 128
Total Cats: 12
From: Bergen, Norway
Default

I has it!
Feels much more like a normal gas engine and does not fall flat on its face at 3k rpm like all the euro diesels do. Trying to treat it nice since it`s new and all but it revs easily to 5k and I can imagine this being a fun engine in a smaller RWD car than my AWD CX-5. (Allthough I`d rather have a gas turbo myself)

Are the old RX-7 Fd3s twins as nice and compact as this?


Video:
Attached Thumbnails youtube: Skyactiv explained-skyactiv_d_2011_04.jpg  
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 12:45 PM
  #57  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Wow. I personally would prefer a simpler single-turbo setup, but it sounds like the powerband characteristics are spectacular.

Hope we get them here.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 12:53 PM
  #58  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Man that will be a pain in the **** to replace, that turbo is at the back near the firewall.
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 01:11 PM
  #59  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

Diesel has always been the way to go, always!!!
Look at every other market in the world, the USofA is the only place where they are frowned upon...wonder why?
Old Jan 26, 2013 | 04:47 PM
  #60  
Chilicharger665's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,694
Total Cats: 67
From: SE NM
Default

If Mazda does not put this in a CX5, then they are truly stupid. I would buy an AWD model with the diesel instantaneously.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.