Notices
Meet and Greet Say Hi. De-noob yourself.

Noob that is beginning aspiration conversion.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2013 | 08:14 AM
  #41  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

So far manifold options for that sucker are few. Very few.
Old May 22, 2013 | 11:52 AM
  #42  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Welcome danduv, to the best site on the net!
Old May 22, 2013 | 12:39 PM
  #43  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

If you want a ramhorn style manifold that will work with an EFR and retain AC/PS talk to abe at ARTech. I know he has a top mount that will work and I am fairly positive he has a bottom mount that will work too. I know I asked him about it in another thread and he said he would have to test it with an EFR to make sure but he said it should work.

FrankB is also putting an EFR on his stock motor and he went out and got the low boost wastegate which is 6psi, I believe, to be sure he did not vent the block. I for one say buy once. Always try to modify with your absolute end goal in mind so you don't have to redo your setup every time you get the itch for more power.
Old May 22, 2013 | 10:16 PM
  #44  
danduv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -5
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
If you want a ramhorn style manifold that will work with an EFR and retain AC/PS talk to abe at ARTech. I know he has a top mount that will work and I am fairly positive he has a bottom mount that will work too. I know I asked him about it in another thread and he said he would have to test it with an EFR to make sure but he said it should work.

FrankB is also putting an EFR on his stock motor and he went out and got the low boost wastegate which is 6psi, I believe, to be sure he did not vent the block. I for one say buy once. Always try to modify with your absolute end goal in mind so you don't have to redo your setup every time you get the itch for more power.
Exactly what I was thinking.

Any benefits to top or bottom mount? I think I am going this route.
Old May 23, 2013 | 09:53 AM
  #45  
charchri4's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 79
Total Cats: 2
From: Arkansas
Default

I don't know what any of these acronyms mean - log mani, MS, fmic, etc – but I have enjoyed reading this thread very much. I find it amusing that this turbo thing has a complete language all its own and I am glad you guys know what it is!

I’m a bit on the old school side and never got past V8…
Old May 23, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #46  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,705
Total Cats: 904
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Originally Posted by charchri4
I don't know what any of these acronyms mean - log mani, MS, fmic, etc – but I have enjoyed reading this thread very much. I find it amusing that this turbo thing has a complete language all its own and I am glad you guys know what it is!

I’m a bit on the old school side and never got past V8…
log mani = cast turbo manifold, ms = megasquirt, fmic = front mount intercooler.

I looked through your build, looks good man.
Old May 23, 2013 | 11:33 AM
  #47  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by danduv
Exactly what I was thinking.

Any benefits to top or bottom mount? I think I am going this route.
Bottom mounts are better for flow because of the downpipe path not having so many hard bends. The packaging for bottom mounts usually makes retaining AC/PS very difficult. They are also harder to work on.

Top mount manifolds sacrifice optimal flow for ease of packaging and maintenance. The turbo is very easy to get to in the engine bay and is clear from the AC/PS. This also places the turbo near some items in the engine bay that need to be protected from the heat including but not limited to the dipstick, fluid lines/resevoirs, etc.
Old May 23, 2013 | 11:52 AM
  #48  
danduv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -5
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
Bottom mounts are better for flow because of the downpipe path not having so many hard bends. The packaging for bottom mounts usually makes retaining AC/PS very difficult. They are also harder to work on.

Top mount manifolds sacrifice optimal flow for ease of packaging and maintenance. The turbo is very easy to get to in the engine bay and is clear from the AC/PS. This also places the turbo near some items in the engine bay that need to be protected from the heat including but not limited to the dipstick, fluid lines/resevoirs, etc.
Generally speaking, would it to safe to say a good top mount would still flow better than log?
Old May 23, 2013 | 11:56 AM
  #49  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

For sure. Leaps and bounds better. They still flow very well, it is just not as optimal as a bottom mount. Most people around here with ramhorn manifolds run top mount for ease of packaging and access.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LucaCarMods
Build Threads
11
Feb 14, 2016 06:13 AM
interestedofold
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
Sep 29, 2015 01:42 PM
asmasm
MEGAsquirt
21
Sep 23, 2015 10:53 AM
Squiblez
Meet and Greet
1
Sep 23, 2015 01:50 AM
shanesauce
General Miata Chat
1
Sep 6, 2015 08:47 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 AM.