When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yeah 100% I used gpt to post, I shot it some ideas told it what i wanted it to say. Then it gave me something that I could copy and paste in about 2 seconds. To be honest I just figured it would seem a lot more legit if my sentences were structured well and all proper punctuation. The program is real, my intent is to help the community out, gather data across as many setups as I possibly can and launch this on a website when I know i have all the bases covered. The tool actually works and solves a real problem people have chasing VE corrections. Also, the guy that said VE is 10% of a tune. I never claimed that tuning the VE table would some how solve all issues, I am just trying to help the people struggling with getting their VE table in order. The tool has actually produced better results for me than what i previously paid for at a dyno shop. I started this over a year ago and have been at it chasing my tail and now finally it is in the stage where I an take one of my older tunes and fully dial it in, in a about 5 passes.
From July of 25 on my personal Car
To what it looks like right now.
I have not decided if i will charge 10 bucks or 15 or hell maybe even make the thing free once I am confident it will work across all setups. The idea is I gather settings from multiple tunes to ensure I am not Releasing some trash. My personal car runs great, the guy over at stangnet that is real. Join up over there and ask him your self this is as organic as it gets.
Yes I also used ai to help me write the code, it is 2026 man why not speed up your work flow and save time I work 50 plus hours a week. So.... I apologize for using ai that is on me I again wanted to seem legit and in my mind I thought that was the angle to come in at, apparantly I was wrong....
But that is enough of me trying to explain thought process .... @Bloopdog I mean is your car not running better after the fixes? Seriously here to help and maybe if I get this thing launched and it takes off people can actually get some results that work after a couple passes for the price of a pizza. I work construction and I know what a dollar means, hell you can't even get two bags of groceries now for under 50 bucks. If I can help some one enjoy their car that is one less thing that some one who is grinding all week and sitting in traffic has to think about , people are building these cars to enjoy the drive not sit there and troublshoot issues. If they made it that far on the tune and the last thing is to dial in the VE and they can do that for lunch money...
Is what it is man, I am here to try and help take it or leave it I guess.
@Bloopdog You went from peak 14.3 psi to a 7,076 RPM redline pull at 18.9 psi in 48 hours. You ran a 700cc-injected boosted Miata to 7,076 RPM at 18.9 psi. That says something about the tune. People don't push their car that hard if the tune is making them nervous.
Your car runs better after the fixes and you know it. All good tho you do you bro, let the herd steer you away from getting your car fully dialed....
I get that you're excited about your tool, but you gotta realize that other people might not be blown away. Half of the people that get on this forum post their tune, ask for help and never come back or try the changes.
You're not going to build rapport with people on a forum by posting very obviously AI responses. Your tool might be cool, it might be 100x better than VE AutoTune Live or whatever, but don't be mad when people are fine with EGO picking up 5% of their fueling.
People already paid for autotune in tuner studio, they're probably going to use that, do some smoothing and be fine with it.
Good luck, not trying to **** all over your venture, but I'd be more realistic about it. At least you got some interaction here as opposed to some of the other forums you posted on.
Yeah the ai **** was a mistake, I get it. I am not mad, I was just pointing out the obvious. Dude's car running better, fully engaged some one points out i used ai now I am evil thread halts. This tool works, I am seriously trying to help people as crazy as that may sound cause most mfers are out for them selves. I would sleep easier knowing that i helped a mfer enjoy their car.
The thread halted because nobody had anything else to say. Most of the people commenting here either have their cars sorted or aren't running a Megasquirt.
@Bloopdog You went from peak 14.3 psi to a 7,076 RPM redline pull at 18.9 psi in 48 hours. You ran a 700cc-injected boosted Miata to 7,076 RPM at 18.9 psi. That says something about the tune. People don't push their car that hard if the tune is making them nervous.
Your car runs better after the fixes and you know it. All good tho you do you bro, let the herd steer you away from getting your car fully dialed....
Boost went up because i have boost by gear setup, just depended what gear i was in. To be completely honest I still have interest in at least letting you get data and continuing the table fixes, I just havent driven the car since I havent been at work, the fiance's daily gets taken most places unless its just me. I had the car running decently enough I could do pulls to 20psi without being overly nervous to be fair
. I just know there are some areas of the map where fueling needs work, which I havent taken the time to smooth out via hand massaging. I also didnt try the last iteration because of the lean spool thing setting off my afr cut. I tried getting that cleared up, but it wanted a ton of fuel, and just kept wanting it no matter how much I added, and how ugly the map looked. Im going to give it what it *wants* and then figure out why it wants it, but im not too sure its correct. I still hit afr cut on the spoolup after shifting gears quickly. I didnt want to figure that out and negate the ve tables I was getting from you, or restart the whole process.
The ai was wafting its cadence from the first post, I had my suspicions that just grew larger until someone finally pointed it out and stopped making me second guess. It definitely made it a little less credible from my pov, because like mentioned, I didnt know how or what was purely LLM or what it claimed to be. Though I had no problem just seeing that no crazy changes were being made that would make me stop.
Im somewhat capable enough to hand smooth a ve table and give the motor exactly what it wants where it wants it, but I like the idea so I decided to give it a shot. Its not like I cant just go back to my starting tune before this and undo what ive changed. VE analyze is a great tool, and I do struggle to see how this could be better by enough comparison that it would be worth a regular joe buying and using, when it may still need hand smoothing in the end anyway.
As for community treatment, people are going to treat me exactly as I act and they see fit, if its seen as naive to give something new a shot just because similar tools exists then I have no qualms with it, thats just a difference of opinion. I will get the pos out tomorrow and get a log with that ve table. Though im still concerned corrections like air temp are in bigger play, It cooled down here to around 70 ambient, so temps and corrections will be different. Thats fine if theyre accurate, but im not sure they are.
And to be fair, following the herd is not always a bad thing. It usually helps prevent catastrophic issues that they have tried, tested, experienced, and know how to prevent )_)
I was actually curious what you were doing here, not even trying to **** on it. I write code with AI all the time, it's iterative and works if you feed it the right prompts and have an actual understanding of whatever code you are writing. I even played with GPT to smooth out some VE tables and it actually did a decent job with that. I say carry on, though I think it's pretty important to be transparent with what you are doing here, hence my questions.
I was actually curious what you were doing here, not even trying to **** on it. I write code with AI all the time, it's iterative and works if you feed it the right prompts and have an actual understanding of whatever code you are writing. I even played with GPT to smooth out some VE tables and it actually did a decent job with that. I say carry on, though I think it's pretty important to be transparent with what you are doing here, hence my questions.
To be completely honest I still have interest in at least letting you get data and continuing the table fixes,
Good deal. I suggest applying the latest table, then dropping your dead time by 0.1 ms then driving re logging, we can drop the dead time by 0.1 ms again on the next pass and re-log I feel like the dead time should certainly de dropped, from everything i researched the dead time is too high. Dropping in increments and re logging each pass I feel would be the best option here. Flash the latest table and drop the dead time then re-log. I'd be happy to see your car running like it should. If dead time is off your fueling issues will never be solved.
TunerStudio: Fuel Settings-> AFR Safety System The "Active time" (or "Delay" / "Time" depending on your TS version - same parameter, internally maxafr_en_time) is set to 0.3 seconds. Your worst observed shift transient from all your logs is 0.48s so basically every aggressive shift the cut fires. Set it to 0.7 seconds.
1
