Question on math formula for hand tuning VE table?
#1
Question on math formula for hand tuning VE table?
Question on math formula for hand tuning VE table?
I know there has to be a standard math correction formula for hand changing VE table cells using track data logs.
For example. Lets say your track/street data log shows 5400 RPM @ 170KPA. You are currently at a VE of 120 burning 11.3/1 on gasoline and want to change to 11.8/1?
I know there has to be a simple standard math equation to lower VE# fueling that could mathematically nail ratios.
Andy Whittle has some great formulas for data logging but cant seem to find the base formula to hand tune. Should be the same one Megasquirt uses in autotune?
I know there has to be a standard math correction formula for hand changing VE table cells using track data logs.
For example. Lets say your track/street data log shows 5400 RPM @ 170KPA. You are currently at a VE of 120 burning 11.3/1 on gasoline and want to change to 11.8/1?
I know there has to be a simple standard math equation to lower VE# fueling that could mathematically nail ratios.
Andy Whittle has some great formulas for data logging but cant seem to find the base formula to hand tune. Should be the same one Megasquirt uses in autotune?
#5
Yes fuel VE 1 table guess I deserved that.
Trying to get it pretty much spot on before incorporating and don't trust autotune for on track session. Kinda just like the hands on with datalogs?
My table to incorporate is actually a bit leaner than Im trying to hit now. Trying to be a bit more detailed with things like spool up, and autotune and incorporate was a bit off?
Or I am just a sucker for trying to do things the old hard way?
Trying to get it pretty much spot on before incorporating and don't trust autotune for on track session. Kinda just like the hands on with datalogs?
My table to incorporate is actually a bit leaner than Im trying to hit now. Trying to be a bit more detailed with things like spool up, and autotune and incorporate was a bit off?
Or I am just a sucker for trying to do things the old hard way?
#9
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 856
Ted,
But his VE table was rich, or at least his mixture was. If he has Incorporate turned on, and his target is 11.8, already, what is he to do? Adjust the VE table.
I think you are assuming his starting with a good VE table. But that is not the case.
Look at the fueling equations. The difference is a factor of 14.7 / AFR target. If his AFR target is 11.8, and he is running 11.3, simply turning on Incorporate will make him 14.7 / 11.8 Richer. He wants leaner.
Step back and visualize what you are saying here.
Maniac, yes.
But his VE table was rich, or at least his mixture was. If he has Incorporate turned on, and his target is 11.8, already, what is he to do? Adjust the VE table.
I think you are assuming his starting with a good VE table. But that is not the case.
Look at the fueling equations. The difference is a factor of 14.7 / AFR target. If his AFR target is 11.8, and he is running 11.3, simply turning on Incorporate will make him 14.7 / 11.8 Richer. He wants leaner.
Step back and visualize what you are saying here.
Maniac, yes.
#12
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 856
Now I see where you are coming from. Not necessarily, it may be that Authority is zero. My point in my first answer is that if EGO is active, yet he is still not getting where he wants to be, then he has to take that correction into account that IN ADDITION.
I also was not assuming any AFR table target, only his desired target.
I think that was in keeping with the question.
EDIT: Bedtime in EST Zone. I’m not ignoring you.
I also was not assuming any AFR table target, only his desired target.
I think that was in keeping with the question.
EDIT: Bedtime in EST Zone. I’m not ignoring you.
#13
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,773
Total Cats: 354
No worries man, respect.
My approach is and has always been, do it right, fix it if you find out it is wrong, and slower is usually faster. I am frequently asked to solve highly complex technology or regulatory problems for others, they are almost always rooted in deviating from that stated approach.
My approach is and has always been, do it right, fix it if you find out it is wrong, and slower is usually faster. I am frequently asked to solve highly complex technology or regulatory problems for others, they are almost always rooted in deviating from that stated approach.
#14
Everyone is correct in one way or another.
DNMakinson got it from the start however. Thank you.
My understanding is you want your actual fuel table as close as possible to perfect so less change is needed?
By hand tuning and not using incorporate or target AFR table, I am able to see subtle effects in the datalog with small changes.
IE mixture change, while changing VVT timing. Mixture change just from different gas station mixtures.
FYI noted .3 AFR difference in two different stations that was repeatable.
At my compression and boost in Florida temperatures, that could be the difference between awesome running and shrapnel bouncing around Sebring.
DNMakinson got it from the start however. Thank you.
My understanding is you want your actual fuel table as close as possible to perfect so less change is needed?
By hand tuning and not using incorporate or target AFR table, I am able to see subtle effects in the datalog with small changes.
IE mixture change, while changing VVT timing. Mixture change just from different gas station mixtures.
FYI noted .3 AFR difference in two different stations that was repeatable.
At my compression and boost in Florida temperatures, that could be the difference between awesome running and shrapnel bouncing around Sebring.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post