Notices
MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2026 | 02:11 PM
  #61  
matmsm's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by X-Cam34
Tuner Studio ==== > Boost VVT ======> Boost Control Target Table:

New Table to paste into tuner studio


Code:
152.0 158.0 162.0 162.0 160.0 155.0 150.0 145.0
152.0 158.0 162.0 162.0 160.0 155.0 150.0 145.0
150.0 157.0 162.0 162.0 158.0 153.0 148.0 142.0
145.0 152.0 158.0 158.0 155.0 150.0 145.0 138.0
135.0 142.0 148.0 148.0 145.0 142.0 138.0 132.0
120.0 125.0 130.0 130.0 128.0 125.0 122.0 118.0
105.0 108.0 110.0 110.0 110.0 108.0 108.0 105.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
You need to change the RPM axis (the bottom row of the boost target table):


Change from:
Code:
200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
To:

Code:
3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, 6000, 6500
The new table is shaped like real driving:
  • Closed throttle (TPS 0%) row: All 100 kPa = no boost at all, ever. The turbo gets a break when you're not asking for power.
  • Light throttle (TPS 20-40%) rows: Tiny amounts of boost 105 to 130 kPa (0.5 to 4 psi). Cruising on the highway, light passing, normal driving. Smooth and gentle.
  • Medium throttle (TPS 60-70%) rows: Moderate boost 145 to 158 kPa (6.5 to 8.5 psi). Pulling onto a highway, accelerating up a hill.
  • Full throttle (TPS 90-100%) rows: Peak boost 162 kPa (9 psi). The most you can safely make on stock injectors.



I did not see this post when writing my last one. That answers one of my questions, thanks! I'll try these out and it definitely makes sense vs. just having a flat boost target.
Old May 6, 2026 | 02:32 PM
  #62  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

Stock 265cc purple top injectors =====> Needs settings I suggested ===> Unless you can verify the fuel pressure on your car this is the safest bet for now.


Could you elaborate on the reasoning for this a bit, should I only go to advanced if I can't get good boost control results only using the sensitivity slide? Closed loop boost control in general was a bit confusing for me, does the rest of the cl bc settings look normal?
Source: MSExtra forum thread "what's going on here? MS3-pro PID boost control tuning"


https://www.msextra.com/forums/viewt...?f=134&t=56123

https://www.msextra.com/forums/viewt...55619&start=60


"In basic mode, the code just sets the PID gains to 100-100-100.
Advanced mode allows you to change them."

And also:
"Depending on the version of the firmware, tuning P only will never reach the target.
Your best bet is to go back to basic mode and tune the sensitivity slider to get you
to the target with minimal overshoot and minimal oscillation."

================================================== ====

Boost Tolerance is Off. Worth turning on with a value of about 30 kPa once you have basic boost dialed. It tells the ECU to ignore tiny fluctuations within tolerance and only react to meaningful deviations.

The forum messed up the formatting for the Boost Control Pasting into Tuner Studio ; attached for you.


Code:
 The rest of your CL boost settings:

Good:  Algorithm: Closed-loop correct for a working setup

Good:  System type: Single Solenoid Good: matches your EBC

Good:   Solenoid frequency: 39Hz Slow — fine for most MAC valves and similar

Good: Min/Max Duty: 0/100 standard

Good: Lower CLT Threshold: 170°F — sane, prevents boost control from running before warmup Good:

Lower Limit Delta: 100 kPa — this is your "open loop until close to target" gate. 100 kPa is wide; you're effectively running open loop with PID kicking in only near target. 40-50 kPa is tighter. Once Basic mode is dialed, you can reduce this for finer control.


Upper Limit Delta: 20 kPa — if MAP exceeds target by >20 kPa, system goes to closed (zero) duty. Reasonable safety net.

Max Rate: 500 kPa/sec — rate limit on duty cycle changes. Standard.
Edit: Just keep in mind that we are changing a lot of settings and this kinda puts you back at base map territory the fueling will for sure be off, but now that we have a solid base the VE changes will start to have a real effect.
Attached Files
File Type: txt
Boost_Control_Pasteable.txt (402 Bytes, 8 views)

Last edited by X-Cam34; May 6, 2026 at 02:52 PM.
Old May 6, 2026 | 02:50 PM
  #63  
matmsm's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 1
Default

I appreciate the sources, I will do some more reading on the topic.
I totally understand we're taking some steps back here. Good news is the fuel map wasn't even close to being dialed to begin with
I'll make these changes and get a good driving session in later today. Thank you.
Old May 6, 2026 | 02:56 PM
  #64  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

Good deal and the data logs will tell me where the fixes landed and how to adjust, this helps me develop my software while helping you at the same time.

Edit: If you are using Auto Tune during logging or making adjustments at all then I do not need those logs, I need it with just you driving, the adjustments while driving will obscure data.
Old May 6, 2026 | 08:07 PM
  #65  
matmsm's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 1
Default

Alright the new ae curve worked like a dream, I really should've used trubokittys base map instead of whatever one I did.
Drivability got much smoother, but looks like it's running rich almost all around. I didn't hand tune any part of the fuel table yet, as much as I did want to adjust at least idle, to let your tool do the heavy lifting.
Boost control also needs adjustment as I saw it overshoot target pretty badly before evening out, I'm assuming that's tuned by the slider. Info is attached, looking forward to the next iteration.
Attached Files
File Type: csv
2026-05-06_17.39.44.csv (15.40 MB, 6 views)
File Type: msq
matmsm tune after round2.msq (293.1 KB, 6 views)
Old May 6, 2026 | 08:59 PM
  #66  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

Boost control also needs adjustment as I saw it overshoot target pretty badly before evening out
Make all 162.0 value down to 158



but looks like it's running rich almost all around.
Yes very Much so...



Make Changes to Boost control table, paste in new table save tune Flash re log.
Attached Files
File Type: txt
After_Boost_AECurve1.txt (1.2 KB, 5 views)
Old May 6, 2026 | 10:38 PM
  #67  
matmsm's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 1
Default

I've got some new data for you so far I have only made changes as you mentioned them, no input from my end just fyi
The log got split in two because TS froze in the middle for whatever reason
Attached Files
File Type: csv
2026-05-06_20.49.50.csv (17.92 MB, 5 views)
File Type: csv
2026-05-06_21.07.55.csv (18.88 MB, 5 views)
File Type: msq
matmsm tune after round3.msq (293.1 KB, 11 views)
Old May 7, 2026 | 04:54 AM
  #68  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

Just ran thru my tool automated mode. things are still rich a lot less so now.... I just did a quick pass with my tool before I head to work.
Attached Files
File Type: txt
After_Boost_AECurve2.txt (1.2 KB, 6 views)
Old May 7, 2026 | 09:39 PM
  #69  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

You are fine to make adjustments, I just want the logged data to be steady state, make your adjustment if needed then only send me the data when all of that is done, just make sure that I get the table after you made your adjustments and it is for sure what is used during logging...

So you are still maxing out your injectors when you are going over 5k RPM what we will do with that is lower the boost so you will able to drive your car without worry at the higher RPM range: You really need to upgrade your injectors but I will help you make the car drive-able until you do that.

So here is a safe Boost Control Table that allows you to be able to do WOT pulls without risk, if you could flash the fuel table and this boost table as well then re log that would be great, we could add more boost I just wanna see where this lands I'd rather start a bit smaller on the boost to be on the safe side maxing your injectors on boost is one pull away from a bad day...


Also Updated Duty Bias Table
Attached Files
File Type: txt
BoostControlTarget.txt (402 Bytes, 7 views)
File Type: txt
DutyBias.txt (192 Bytes, 4 views)

Last edited by X-Cam34; May 7, 2026 at 09:51 PM.
Old May 9, 2026 | 08:57 PM
  #70  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

@matmsm

@Bloopdog

Done with the thread? All good, I would like just a bit of feedback on the tools effects on your car, just tell me how your car is running prior to your time in this thread and after, all I ask in exchange for the time I spent. Thanks, have a good weekend ...
Old May 9, 2026 | 09:48 PM
  #71  
matmsm's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 1
Default

Not yet, haven't had a chance to drive the car with changes. Will get some more data soon.
Old May 9, 2026 | 11:21 PM
  #72  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

Yeah maybe we just leave the Boost control target as is, refine the VE Modify the duty bias to stop the over shoot, and then lean the Boost AFR out so that the injectors are not maxed. That I think is the most solid path forward till you upgrade the injectors, leaning the AFR target out will stop the injectors from maxing out in the high rpm areas, the idea of leaning the AFR table out is cause the injectors can not deliver the fuel needed to hit the targets. if we fix the over shoot dial the VE and lean the afr where the injectors can not compensate you will have a dialed tune for what you have. Specifically, lean the AFR target in the cells where Duty Cycle is hitting 98%+...only

https://bittuned.com/guides/injector...ycle-explained

https://www.supraforums.com/threads/...-cycle.106490/

https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/gene.../afr-question/

https://www.msextra.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=76093

https://www.mr2oc.com/threads/what-a...thanol.453632/
Old May 10, 2026 | 01:10 PM
  #73  
matmsm's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 1
Default

Updating tables right now, and will do some pulls shortly. Right around 8psi seems right to me. I am in no rush for more power, I just want a tune as stable or more stable that the stock ecu. Need a good foundation for upgrades, and just as a proof of concept to myself.
Old May 10, 2026 | 02:44 PM
  #74  
matmsm's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 1
Default

So I did a quick run with your updates. I had 2 cuts on one of the pulls, not sure what happened but it wasn't afr safety or overboost. It was overboost, I forgot we turned on boost tolerance. Looks like it was just tickling the threshold with the new target table.
Attached Files
File Type: csv
2026-05-10_12.56.08.csv (19.80 MB, 5 views)
File Type: msq
CurrentTune.msq (293.1 KB, 10 views)
Old May 10, 2026 | 04:18 PM
  #75  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

Peak injector Duty in the latest log: 90.6%
Location:
t = 530.8s (one specific pull)
RPM = 6156
MAP = 147.8 kPa (7.1 psi)
TPS = 99.8% (WOT)
AFR = 11.90 vs target 12.10 (just 0.2 rich, basically on target)
PW = 17.67 ms at 90.6% duty
VE table cell: RPM 6100 × MAP 145 (nearest break point)

================================================== ================================================== ================
Updated boost target table (peak 160 --> 145)

Open Tuner Studio ====> Boost/VVT

Left side Boost Control Settings

Boost Control Upper Limit Delta(kPa): 20.0 --> 30.0

(Currently shows 20.0 change to 30.0)

Right side Overboost Engine Protection

Tolerance(kPa): 30.0 --> 40.0

(Currently shows 30.0 under Boost Tolerance — change to 40.0)

Everything else stays exactly the same.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apply these settings, flash new VE table, Save tune---> power cycle car. Log.




Attached Files
File Type: txt
After_Boost_AECurve3.txt (1.2 KB, 4 views)
File Type: txt
Boost_Control_Latest.txt (390 Bytes, 6 views)

Last edited by X-Cam34; May 10, 2026 at 05:21 PM.
Old May 11, 2026 | 08:02 PM
  #76  
matmsm's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 1
Default

More logs. Traffic was very bad, tough to get good pulls. Will try for some better logs soon.
Attached Files
File Type: msq
File Type: csv
2026-05-11_16.42.26.csv (19.12 MB, 3 views)
Old May 11, 2026 | 10:11 PM
  #77  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

Some info to help you understand what is going on here. https://kris8342.github.io/Turbo_Info/

Ve table is looking a lot better...

Code:
VE CORRECTION REPORT
5/11/2026, 8:54:38 PM
===========================================================================

Cells corrected: 91 (16 lean, 75 rich)

Cell Status EGO AFR Err Before After Change
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3500 x 160 RICH Pulling 1.0% +0.20 70 69.7 -0.3
4400 x 160 LEAN Adding 0.3% -0.21 78 78.2 +0.2
5000 x 160 LEAN Adding 0.6% +0.24 78.2 78.5 +0.3
5500 x 160 LEAN Adding 1.6% +0.28 77.8 79 +1.2
6100 x 160 LEAN Adding 2.2% -0.08 81.4 81.7 +0.3
3200 x 145 RICH Pulling 2.3% +0.04 67.6 66.1 -1.5
3500 x 145 RICH Pulling 2.5% -0.07 70.9 69.2 -1.7
3800 x 145 RICH Pulling 2.8% -0.27 79.4 77.3 -2.1
5000 x 145 LEAN Adding 0.6% +0.23 76.5 76.8 +0.3
5500 x 145 LEAN Adding 1.4% +0.25 78.2 78.7 +0.5
6100 x 145 LEAN Adding 1.7% -0.16 76.7 78 +1.3
7000 x 145 LEAN Adding 0.8% -0.53 75.6 75.9 +0.3
2500 x 130 RICH Pulling 1.0% -0.22 71.4 71.1 -0.3
3200 x 130 RICH Pulling 1.6% -0.31 70.1 69 -1.1
3500 x 130 RICH Pulling 3.5% -0.39 73 70.7 -2.3
3800 x 130 RICH Pulling 4.1% -1.15 79.8 76.8 -3
2500 x 115 RICH Pulling 1.2% 0.00 71.9 71.6 -0.3
3200 x 115 RICH Pulling 1.6% -0.43 71.4 70.4 -1
3500 x 115 RICH Pulling 2.5% -0.89 71.5 69.8 -1.7
3800 x 115 RICH Pulling 3.5% -2.19 76.7 74.5 -2.2
4400 x 115 LEAN Adding 0.6% +0.03 84.3 84.6 +0.3
5500 x 115 LEAN Adding 1.4% -0.82 76.7 77.1 +0.4
2500 x 100 RICH Pulling 1.2% -0.14 68.7 68.4 -0.3
3200 x 100 RICH Pulling 1.9% -0.35 68.9 67.7 -1.2
3500 x 100 RICH Pulling 2.6% -0.87 66.1 64.6 -1.5
3800 x 100 RICH Pulling 2.9% -2.63 73.4 72.1 -1.3
1250 x 90 RICH Pulling 4.6% -1.72 71.6 68.7 -2.9
1750 x 90 RICH Pulling 1.8% -0.37 65.1 64 -1.1
2500 x 90 RICH Pulling 1.5% -0.21 66.4 65.4 -1
3200 x 90 RICH Pulling 1.5% -0.42 66.2 65.9 -0.3
3500 x 90 RICH Pulling 2.0% -0.68 65.2 64 -1.2
3800 x 90 RICH Pulling 1.8% -0.60 71.6 70.4 -1.2
4100 x 90 RICH Pulling 2.3% -0.93 78.4 76.7 -1.7
4700 x 90 RICH Pulling 1.6% -2.00 80.8 80.4 -0.4
800 x 80 RICH Pulling 3.4% -1.30 77.3 75.7 -1.6
1250 x 80 RICH Pulling 3.8% -1.48 79.6 77.7 -1.9
1750 x 80 RICH Pulling 1.9% -0.51 66.9 65.8 -1.1
2500 x 80 RICH Pulling 1.7% -0.29 66.2 65.2 -1
3200 x 80 RICH Pulling 1.3% -0.43 61.9 61.6 -0.3
3500 x 80 RICH Pulling 1.1% -0.19 60.3 60 -0.3
3800 x 80 RICH Pulling 1.4% -0.39 67.7 67.4 -0.3
4100 x 80 RICH Pulling 3.0% -0.89 72.9 70.8 -2.1
4400 x 80 RICH Pulling 3.9% -0.43 73.5 71.4 -2.1
4700 x 80 RICH Pulling 3.1% -0.98 77 74.7 -2.3
800 x 70 RICH Pulling 4.2% +0.70 76.2 74 -2.2
1250 x 70 RICH Pulling 3.1% -0.50 77.1 75.7 -1.4
1750 x 70 RICH Pulling 1.5% -0.14 66.2 65.9 -0.3
2500 x 70 RICH Pulling 1.7% -0.27 64.7 63.7 -1
3200 x 70 RICH Pulling 1.9% -0.30 62.4 61.4 -1
3500 x 70 RICH Pulling 1.4% -0.34 59.7 59.4 -0.3
3800 x 70 RICH Pulling 0.8% -0.57 65.1 64.8 -0.3
4400 x 70 RICH Pulling 3.9% -0.11 69.9 67.7 -2.2
4700 x 70 RICH Pulling 3.8% -0.34 75.8 73.1 -2.7
800 x 60 RICH Pulling 1.4% -0.12 73.7 73.4 -0.3
1250 x 60 RICH Pulling 2.9% -0.89 74.9 73.8 -1.1
1750 x 60 RICH Pulling 0.6% +0.02 62.6 62.3 -0.3
2500 x 60 RICH Pulling 0.9% -0.08 63.3 63 -0.3
3200 x 60 RICH Pulling 1.9% -0.15 60.4 59.4 -1
3500 x 60 RICH Pulling 1.6% -0.21 60.3 59.4 -0.9
3800 x 60 RICH Pulling 1.3% -0.64 62.9 62.6 -0.3
4700 x 60 RICH Pulling 3.8% -1.20 78.2 75.4 -2.8
5000 x 60 RICH Pulling 4.0% -0.91 73.8 71 -2.8
800 x 50 RICH Pulling 0.7% -1.28 66.8 66.5 -0.3
1250 x 50 RICH Pulling 3.3% -1.32 67.1 66 -1.1
1750 x 50 RICH Pulling 0.9% -0.03 56.6 56.3 -0.3
2500 x 50 RICH Pulling 0.8% +0.01 60.8 60.5 -0.3
3200 x 50 RICH Pulling 1.6% -0.07 57.6 56.8 -0.8
3500 x 50 RICH Pulling 1.8% -0.16 57.2 56.2 -1
3800 x 50 RICH Pulling 1.5% -0.46 60.1 59.8 -0.3
4700 x 50 RICH Pulling 3.4% -2.17 74 73.2 -0.8
5000 x 50 RICH Pulling 3.9% -1.31 69.6 67.7 -1.9
500 x 40 RICH Pulling 4.2% -1.74 60.3 58.8 -1.5
800 x 40 RICH Pulling 4.4% -0.92 55.8 55.7 -0.1
1250 x 40 RICH Pulling 1.9% -0.18 62.9 62.1 -0.8
1750 x 40 RICH Pulling 0.7% -0.23 59.1 58.8 -0.3
3200 x 40 RICH Pulling 0.7% -0.33 56 55.7 -0.3
3500 x 40 RICH Pulling 1.3% -0.50 59.5 59.2 -0.3
3800 x 40 RICH Pulling 1.8% -0.84 61.1 60.4 -0.7
4700 x 40 RICH Pulling 4.1% -1.81 67.5 65.9 -1.6
800 x 30 LEAN Pulling 4.1% -0.13 46.1 46.6 +0.5
1250 x 30 RICH Pulling 3.4% -0.10 50.7 50.3 -0.4
1750 x 30 RICH Pulling 0.7% -0.03 56.5 56.2 -0.3
2500 x 30 LEAN Adding 1.6% +0.29 53.6 54.1 +0.5
3200 x 30 LEAN Adding 0.8% +0.02 50.3 50.6 +0.3
3500 x 30 RICH Pulling 1.8% -0.01 38.7 38.3 -0.4
3800 x 30 RICH Pulling 1.9% +0.78 42.2 41.7 -0.5
800 x 20 RICH Pulling 6.3% -0.33 47.6 47.3 -0.3
1250 x 20 RICH Pulling 6.1% -0.34 52.7 52.6 -0.1
2500 x 20 LEAN Adding 4.3% +1.81 24.2 24.7 +0.5
3200 x 20 LEAN Adding 1.8% +1.20 25.4 25.6 +0.2
3500 x 20 LEAN Adding 0.7% +2.22 25.6 25.9 +0.3



================================================== ================


PER-PULL BREAKDOWN
------------------------------------------------------
Code:
#   time     RPM range    peak kPa  peak psi  peak RPM  end kPa  end psi  frames
   1    76.5s  2532-6077      176.1     10.85      4165    149.4     6.97      68
   2   181.5s  2559-6076      145.0      6.33      6076    145.0     6.33      27
   3  2218.1s  2534-6338      176.8     10.95      4168    151.2     7.23      80
   4  2465.5s  3239-5922      154.4      7.70      4498    148.2     6.80      31
   5  3114.6s  3892-6251      150.2      7.09      4713    147.8     6.74      49
   6  3147.5s  4066-5440      151.8      7.32      5151    151.4     7.26      50
   7  3300.5s  3494-6502      153.4      7.55      4530    145.6     6.42      33
================================================== ================


PEAK BOOST OBSERVED
------------------------------------------------------
10.95 psi gauge (176.8 kPa absolute)
at 4168 RPM, t = 2220.7s
injector DC at peak MAP: 78.1%
max injector DC during WOT: 97.6% @ 6338 RPM, 151.2 kPa (7.23 psi)


Updated Duty Bias Table with one small change.
Attached Files
File Type: txt
Matsm_Latest.txt (1.2 KB, 4 views)
File Type: txt
Latest_Duty.txt (203 Bytes, 4 views)
Old May 11, 2026 | 10:16 PM
  #78  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

You VE table is getting real close, I will actually take the time and go over it by hand on the next round just ran it thru my tool at 50% correction on this round, long day at work...
Old May 12, 2026 | 12:23 AM
  #79  
matmsm's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 1
Default

Got some decent pulls and tried to hit some lower cells too. Appreciate it man, the reference is sick too. Wish I would've had that 2 weeks ago
Attached Files
File Type: mlg
2026-05-11_22.06.40.mlg (8.95 MB, 8 views)
File Type: msq
matmsm tune after round6.msq (293.5 KB, 12 views)
Old May 12, 2026 | 09:10 PM
  #80  
X-Cam34's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 63
Total Cats: 3
Default

Boost is still over shooting a bit, but let's just do VE correction, and Duty Bias Adjustment before we lower Boost target... this round. We are almost done just let me know how the car feels after this round of corrections. I do think that the new Bias Table will help with the over-shoot issue...







PER-PULL BREAKDOWN
Code:
------------------------------------------------------
  #   time     RPM range    peak kPa  peak psi  peak RPM  end kPa  end psi  frames
   1   234.7s  2504-6121      161.3      8.70      5205    139.7     5.57     119
   2   256.7s  2668-6096      168.3      9.71      3637    154.8     7.76     107
   3   494.1s  2545-6659      161.5      8.73      4524    150.0     7.06      45
   4   588.7s  3051-5935      180.2     11.44      3911    154.2     7.67      93
   5   688.3s  2526-3387      157.4      8.13      3387    157.4     8.13      34
   6   695.9s  2912-4013      177.4     11.03      3864    163.6     9.03      43
   7   783.4s  3394-5889      169.3      9.86      4309    152.0     7.35      47
   8   813.8s  3836-5808      177.4     11.03      4050    154.2     7.67      60
   9   909.5s  2530-6153      144.9      6.32      6153    144.9     6.32      21
  10   911.3s  4670-5902      149.0      6.91      4929    148.2     6.80      21
  11   913.1s  4642-6038      151.3      7.25      4867    149.8     7.03      32
  12   915.5s  4786-6062      153.5      7.57      5242    151.8     7.32      47
  13   935.5s  2508-6189      169.6      9.90      3648    152.2     7.38     120
  14  1057.7s  2505-6423      163.9      9.08      3490    152.1     7.36     127
  15  1149.2s  4264-4774      153.8      7.61      4774    153.8     7.61      21
  16  1212.2s  4133-6046      149.6      7.00      5055    148.6     6.86      24
  17  1306.7s  3280-6114      154.0      7.64      4597    150.1     7.07      29
  18  1323.8s  3206-5123      170.4     10.02      4301    151.8     7.32      40

Can you tell me if the car has been improving with the VE changes , as we move along?
Attached Files
File Type: txt
Matmsm_VE.txt (1.2 KB, 6 views)
File Type: txt
New_Duty_Bias.txt (195 Bytes, 5 views)

Last edited by X-Cam34; May 12, 2026 at 09:21 PM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 PM.