Notices
MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Horribly Bad MPG less than 150 miles per tank

Old Mar 20, 2008 | 12:54 AM
  #21  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

so what easytherm values did you use when burning the firmware?

did you copy the 3 .inc files for coolant and air temps to your working folder so MT shows the correct values?
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 01:20 AM
  #22  
91NApeewee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 297
Total Cats: 0
From: San Diego to LA, CA
Default

I am positive I did, but ill try it again. If I copy them over again do I have to update the ECU or are they just for megatune?
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 08:42 AM
  #23  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

those target afr's are a little lean at high load if you're concerned with longevity.
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #24  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 91NApeewee
I am positive I did, but ill try it again. If I copy them over again do I have to update the ECU or are they just for megatune?
when you built the MS you should have had to burn the firmware to the ECU. Did you burn the parallel firmware which would have the wrong easytherm values?

what happened at 233 seconds in your log? Your CLT jumps up over 27 degress instantly at the same time your throttle position drops to 2 for the rest of the log yet your RPMs and MAP are all over the place. Bad connections?
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #25  
240_to_miata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,617
Total Cats: 16
From: Cromwell, Connecticut
Default

91... check and check again. i forgot a zero twice when i was doing the easy therm and therefor i had a wacky function that wasnt linear so the car would be fine at some temps and other ones would just throw it into 300% enrichments

Definetly check your values, and as for the gas millage TUNE IT!!!


hustler, were you refering to my AFR table?
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 11:41 AM
  #26  
timk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,278
Total Cats: 37
From: Brisbane, Australia
Default

My fuel economy has been pretty bad lately, because of this I changed my AFR targets just before refueling. So far I have done 100km on 1/4 of a tank with the new settings which seems to be better than before.

Here is my revised AFR target table:

Old Mar 20, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #27  
240_to_miata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,617
Total Cats: 16
From: Cromwell, Connecticut
Default

wat ru guys using for ego control settings?

I have:
Ign Events per step: 72
controller step size: 1
Controller authority % : 6

sometimes it seems too slow acting
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #28  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by 91NApeewee
when I am running MS, the gauges show about 195-200 so I thought nothing of it. When i am in warmup wizard it has the cell at like 160 highlighted which corresponds to enrichment of 100% so theoretically it shouldnt be enriching, however that red light stays on.

Ahh OK I don't know what is going on there. Did you load the corresponding MSQ into megalogviewer when you looked at the log file?

Check the req_fuel value too. Should be around 13 for stock injectors IIRC.

At any rate as said above you will need to tune to improve your mileage. I'll bet the PNP maps are really conservative (tuned rich) to keep people from damaging their motors from being too lean. That is my experience anyway. It's better to have crappy gas mileage than a burnt exhaust valve.

Last edited by ZX-Tex; Mar 20, 2008 at 01:40 PM.
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #29  
91NApeewee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 297
Total Cats: 0
From: San Diego to LA, CA
Default

What I just did was recreated the easy therm values and rewrote the .s19 and .inc files. I know I have updated the .s19 on the chip before but looking at the old .inc files they are different. So I just re-update the firmware on the chip, or would i be fine just copying the new .inc files. I dont know what will be lost if I update the chip. Will it just be the .msq that is on there?
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 02:53 PM
  #30  
Arkmage's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,895
Total Cats: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 91NApeewee
when I am running MS, the gauges show about 195-200 so I thought nothing of it. When i am in warmup wizard it has the cell at like 160 highlighted which corresponds to enrichment of 100% so theoretically it shouldnt be enriching, however that red light stays on.


and paul, the MS standalone is one i built following DIYautotunes site, this site and the megamanual
Sounds like you need to change the output setting for the LED in megatune. It's probably set to some other feature instead of warm up enrichment.
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #31  
91NApeewee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 297
Total Cats: 0
From: San Diego to LA, CA
Default

its not the actual LED. It is the "button" labeled warmup in megatune when you are looking at the realtime display. It is red upon cold start up and does not change even at operating temperature
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #32  
timk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,278
Total Cats: 37
From: Brisbane, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by 240_to_miata_OWNER
wat ru guys using for ego control settings?
I've got the same settings as you, but my controller authority is only 5%. My main use of the AFR target table is within MegaLogViewer. Have you done a fair bit of datalogging and fed the data into MLV?

Cheers
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 03:29 AM
  #33  
sabretooth's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21
Total Cats: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
Default

Poor economy here too, although I've got a few other issues I'm trying to sort out. My target AFRs are similar to saboteur's, but I'm yet to do even half a tank on those settings to bother posting them yet.
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 04:39 AM
  #34  
turbobluemiata's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,012
Total Cats: 0
From: Springfield, IL
Default

I don't know what you guys are talking about I get great gas mileage.
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 11:14 AM
  #35  
karter74's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 690
Total Cats: 23
From: Centennial, CO
Default

With my parallel install on my 97, on the highway I get about 29MPG, and could probably do better with better tuning. In town if I drive normally without a heavy foot, I get about 23-25, but with a heavy foot <20mpg. On track I get <11mpg, lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
JxPhan
Meet and Greet
3
Oct 2, 2015 02:17 AM
lsc224
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
Oct 1, 2015 09:17 AM
L4nthonyl
Miata parts for sale/trade
1
Sep 25, 2015 04:18 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 AM.