Notices
MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

IAT placement NA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 11:55 AM
  #21  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

It will be a cold day in hell before I expect anything from a VW to work properly and for that to come close to my marvel of Japanese engineering.
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 12:17 PM
  #22  
kday's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 223
Total Cats: 0
From: Boston
Default

It works better than the marvel of engineering that is the GM IAT sensor.

I don't know VWs, but my Audis are way more highly engineered than the Miata. They do require more care and feeding though.
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 12:20 PM
  #23  
FatKao's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 491
Total Cats: 32
Default

Are you using the new fog light allowance for your intake? Don't forget to remove your sun visors too!
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 04:30 PM
  #24  
engled's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 82
Total Cats: 0
Default





This is where it ended up. I don't think it will get much heat soak.

FatKao, yes and I won't. As soon as I fix my hard top latches, the visors are all that holds the top on now.
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 06:38 PM
  #25  
Stealth97's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 67
From: Canton, Ga
Default

Nice, but use an air filter.
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 06:46 PM
  #26  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by kday
It works better than the marvel of engineering that is the GM IAT sensor.

I don't know VWs, but my Audis are way more highly engineered than the Miata. They do require more care and feeding though.
I don't believe single word of this bullshit.
gm ait = weld on bung, screw in, enjoy.
that audi bullshit: weld on bung, then weld on another, threaded bung, then make sure the o/ring seats properly the tolerances are perfect. bullshit after bullshit after bullshit.
way to overcomplicate the everliving **** out of an ait sensor.

And late 90's-newer audi/vw's suck monkey *****. Constant electrical and other misc bullshit problems.
if by "more highly engineered" you mean "OVERCOMPLICATED AS **** AND THEREFORE HAVE 100+ MORE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS/FAILURE POINTS" then yes, you are right
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 08:51 AM
  #27  
kday's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 223
Total Cats: 0
From: Boston
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I don't believe single word of this bullshit.
gm ait = weld on bung, screw in, enjoy.
that audi bullshit: weld on bung, then weld on another, threaded bung, then make sure the o/ring seats properly the tolerances are perfect. bullshit after bullshit after bullshit.
way to overcomplicate the everliving **** out of an ait sensor.

And late 90's-newer audi/vw's suck monkey *****. Constant electrical and other misc bullshit problems.
if by "more highly engineered" you mean "OVERCOMPLICATED AS **** AND THEREFORE HAVE 100+ MORE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS/FAILURE POINTS" then yes, you are right

I think you missed the point. The point is not that the Audi sensor is easier to mount.
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 11:07 AM
  #28  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

I'm liking the idea of this audi sensor. Looks very "OEM" which is important to us CA folks. Wish I'd have known of it years ago. Next build...
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #29  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,020
Total Cats: 369
From: Athens, Greece
Default

I also like it, as it seems less prone to heatsoak even than the GM open element sensor.
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 12:14 PM
  #30  
richyvrlimited's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
From: Warrington/Birmingham
Default

Add me in the like it list
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 01:21 PM
  #31  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Serious question about the "GM" sensors that we buy from DIY and others. Were any of those ever actually OEM on any GM vehicle, or are they some aftermarket parts that happen to conform to GM's spec for RTC curve and connectorization?

They just don't look like what I expect a factory sensor to look like.
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #32  
scottyd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 498
Total Cats: 0
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Serious question about the "GM" sensors that we buy from DIY and others. Were any of those ever actually OEM on any GM vehicle, or are they some aftermarket parts that happen to conform to GM's spec for RTC curve and connectorization?

They just don't look like what I expect a factory sensor to look like.
Yea they're from a bunch of random GM cars. They actually have a part number for them. It's just much easier to buy them from DIY as you know what you're getting.
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 02:17 PM
  #33  
Stealth97's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 67
From: Canton, Ga
Default

My Saturn from '92 used the same "GM" sensors common to the megasquirt land, probably every GM from the 90's did.
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 02:28 PM
  #34  
richyvrlimited's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
From: Warrington/Birmingham
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Serious question about the "GM" sensors that we buy from DIY and others. Were any of those ever actually OEM on any GM vehicle, or are they some aftermarket parts that happen to conform to GM's spec for RTC curve and connectorization?

They just don't look like what I expect a factory sensor to look like.
I got a 2nd hand FOCUS TDI intercooler a while back that i intended to use for an over the top IC.

Said IC had a sensor in the IC identical in body & connecter to the 'GM' sensor, though the actual element bit was far different.
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 04:48 PM
  #35  
rweatherford's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 332
Total Cats: 1
From: Shelbina, MO (North East)
Default

Typhoon Cyclone IAT's and probably T-TA's had the open element GM IAT.
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 11:53 AM
  #36  
Matt Cramer's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,332
Total Cats: 67
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Serious question about the "GM" sensors that we buy from DIY and others. Were any of those ever actually OEM on any GM vehicle, or are they some aftermarket parts that happen to conform to GM's spec for RTC curve and connectorization?

They just don't look like what I expect a factory sensor to look like.
It was used through most of the '80s - pretty much everything turbo (Regal T-Type, Sunbird, etc) and a fair number of naturally aspirated motors used it. They started moving to more plastic-y sensors in the '90s.
__________________
Matt Cramer
www.diyautotune.com
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Corky Bell
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
18
Nov 22, 2016 09:01 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
gsyk59
MEGAsquirt
2
Sep 20, 2015 04:54 PM
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
Sep 5, 2015 08:02 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM.