map based accel vs tps
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 303
Total Cats: 0
From: Temple City, Ca
i've been noticing that using map based accel enrichment does not work that well. in really small changes in map it doesn't kick in, i even tried adjusting the values for smaller changes, but the car just studders, because it keeps changing back and forth between different values.
i was considering changing to TPS based to fix this problem. for some reason my tps currently does not work, i was thinking of changing it to a maybe a GM sensor or something
anyone try this yet?
simon
i was considering changing to TPS based to fix this problem. for some reason my tps currently does not work, i was thinking of changing it to a maybe a GM sensor or something
anyone try this yet?
simon
I had a difficult time getting accel enrichment working the way I wanted. It's about 90% there but I can still make it stutter with hard accel.
I'm using a 40/60 mix of MAP and TPS. I can run 100% TPS and it's acceptable but running 100% MAP is annoying to drive. I have to touch the throttle before I start to let off the clutch.
For MAP I have 240/4; 170/3; 140/2; 100/1.2
For TPS I have 20/4; 9/3; 6/2; 3/1.2
I'm using a 40/60 mix of MAP and TPS. I can run 100% TPS and it's acceptable but running 100% MAP is annoying to drive. I have to touch the throttle before I start to let off the clutch.
For MAP I have 240/4; 170/3; 140/2; 100/1.2
For TPS I have 20/4; 9/3; 6/2; 3/1.2
I had a difficult time getting accel enrichment working the way I wanted. It's about 90% there but I can still make it stutter with hard accel.
I'm using a 40/60 mix of MAP and TPS. I can run 100% TPS and it's acceptable but running 100% MAP is annoying to drive. I have to touch the throttle before I start to let off the clutch.
For MAP I have 240/4; 170/3; 140/2; 100/1.2
For TPS I have 20/4; 9/3; 6/2; 3/1.2
I'm using a 40/60 mix of MAP and TPS. I can run 100% TPS and it's acceptable but running 100% MAP is annoying to drive. I have to touch the throttle before I start to let off the clutch.
For MAP I have 240/4; 170/3; 140/2; 100/1.2
For TPS I have 20/4; 9/3; 6/2; 3/1.2
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 303
Total Cats: 0
From: Temple City, Ca
I had a difficult time getting accel enrichment working the way I wanted. It's about 90% there but I can still make it stutter with hard accel.
I'm using a 40/60 mix of MAP and TPS. I can run 100% TPS and it's acceptable but running 100% MAP is annoying to drive. I have to touch the throttle before I start to let off the clutch.
For MAP I have 240/4; 170/3; 140/2; 100/1.2
For TPS I have 20/4; 9/3; 6/2; 3/1.2
I'm using a 40/60 mix of MAP and TPS. I can run 100% TPS and it's acceptable but running 100% MAP is annoying to drive. I have to touch the throttle before I start to let off the clutch.
For MAP I have 240/4; 170/3; 140/2; 100/1.2
For TPS I have 20/4; 9/3; 6/2; 3/1.2
so i'm currently using MAP only, and yeah when i slowly accelerate, AE does not pick up and add additional fuel. only when i throttle it harder it picks it up and does it. so for normal street driving it kinda blows. i guess its okay since i dont really drive it that often. weekend/track car
did anyone else have problems with the stock TPS?
thanks
simon
You need a 1.8 or a 1.6 automatic TPS. The 1.6 with manual trans had a on/off switch for a TPS no linear output whatsoever thus it is USELESS for trying to control the MS.





