Notices
MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

req_fuel with ms3 and ev14 injectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 01:29 PM
  #1  
ConnorRigby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 2
Default req_fuel with ms3 and ev14 injectors

Hello all. I've been installing/tunning megasquirt over the last few weeks and i've run into some issues i can't debug for some reason. First heres some info about my car:
* 92 Na
* 94-97 engine swap retaining 92 wiring.
* MS3 built by following the trubokitty guide
* 94-97 intake crossover pipe
* MAF delete
* 01-05 throttle body
* sequential injection mod
* ev14 550 injectors with the flow force byoi kit
* coolant reroute, mishimoto radiator, fans etc

Hopefully that is enough info to help out.

Now my problem is that i can't get the car to run without either A) setting `req_fuel` to something like 17 or B) highlighting the entire fuel ve table and bumping it up like 50. Both of those will get the car started, but as soon as i give it gas it gets WAY to rich (obviously). I recently had rx8 yellow injectors and i drove the car quite a bit on those, but that had the same issues of needing the fuel table to be bumped up quite a bit.

Another probably related issue is that once the car is warmed up, to start it i have to turn the key on like 5 times to get enough fuel into the cylinders to start. I've attached my tune hopefully that helps. I'm assuming i just missed something when converting the 94-97 base map to work on my 92.
Attached Files
File Type: msq
rebuild_fuel_tables.msq (278.0 KB, 61 views)
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 02:03 PM
  #2  
SpartanSV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,232
Total Cats: 169
From: Greeley, CO
Default

Where did you get your injector deadtime information? 0.490ms is likely way to low.
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 02:09 PM
  #3  
ConnorRigby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 2
Default

Update:
I took the 94-97 basemap from trubokitty and restarted all my changes. I've attached the new map i built. This one seems to act more reasonable in that the req_fuel number is not super high. I have to tidy up some wiring for my knock sensor, flex fuel and sequential injection mod, but once i do that i'll take it for a longer drive and report back with a log.
Attached Files
File Type: msq
CurrentTune.msq (277.7 KB, 45 views)
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 02:25 PM
  #4  
SpartanSV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,232
Total Cats: 169
From: Greeley, CO
Default

It's better because the injector deadtime is now 1.2ms which is probably closer to what it should be. You really should try to find the actual deadtime for you injectors though.
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 02:54 PM
  #5  
ConnorRigby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by SpartanSV
It's better because the injector deadtime is now 1.2ms which is probably closer to what it should be. You really should try to find the actual deadtime for you injectors though.
Ah yes i must have forgot to set that the first time around. I wanted to start fresh anyway since i've learned quite a bit in the last couple weeks. My injectors are ev14 550CC. I took the 640CC table from the flowforce website. I'll hunt around for data about my injectors specifically. I got a piece of paper with some data, but i couldn't make much sense of it for Megasquirt.
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 03:18 PM
  #6  
SpartanSV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,232
Total Cats: 169
From: Greeley, CO
Default

That paper is all you need. The top row is likely fuel pressure. You'll use the 43 column.
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 03:26 PM
  #7  
ConnorRigby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 2
Default

The problem with that table is that it is in time and ms3 uses percentage. Any idea how to convert it?
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 03:30 PM
  #8  
SpartanSV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,232
Total Cats: 169
From: Greeley, CO
Default

Originally Posted by ConnorRigby
The problem with that table is that it is in time and ms3 uses percentage. Any idea how to convert it?
Maths
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 04:36 PM
  #9  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,197
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

It’s still wrong though, shouldn’t be .45 at 14 volts. That tables most likely opening time, where as dead time includes opening and closing. Double the taxable and use 14volts as 100%. So like 10volts, 2.5/.9=2.77*100=277%
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 06:25 PM
  #10  
lsdlsd88's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 77
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ConnorRigby
The problem with that table is that it is in time and ms3 uses percentage
I'm sure it says ms in tunerstudio?

oh ok, you mean the curve is in %, the base value is in ms..


Originally Posted by curly
That tables most likely opening time, where as dead time includes opening and closing.
I thought dead time was the DIFFERENCE between opening delay and closing delay, not the SUM (you definitely cannot just double the opening time)

Old Apr 7, 2019 | 12:38 PM
  #11  
ConnorRigby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by lsdlsd88
I'm sure it says ms in tunerstudio?

oh ok, you mean the curve is in %, the base value is in ms..
Here's a photo of the table. I give TunerStudio what 100% is in milliseconds (which i guess is at 0.45 at 14v?)


0.45 is about half of what it is currently operating at if i understand correctly. I have a suspicion it won't run very well at that low. I'll try converting the table to percentage and report back.
Old Apr 7, 2019 | 01:06 PM
  #12  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,197
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

You’re going to run out of VE if you continue with .45, double it and retune.
Old May 16, 2019 | 11:51 AM
  #13  
ConnorRigby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 2
Default

Sorry for the very late response, but i've been too busy to play with the car. I finally spent some time learning what injector-dead time actually is among other things. I made a spreadsheet to do all the math for my injector dead times and came up with this:

i inputted those values and it was like night and day to how the car runs. I also had some incorrect settings in my tune in that i was using "semi sequential" instead of "fully sequential". I also have installed my iacv (this was previously not working/unplugged) so now i have a proper, stable idle.
Thanks for the help fellas!
Old May 16, 2019 | 12:36 PM
  #14  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Big difference, huh?
Old May 16, 2019 | 11:29 PM
  #15  
nigelt's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,462
Total Cats: 389
From: Bainbridge Island, WA
Default

You said earlier that you got those dead times off the FlowForce website, but I do t recognize them. I've got the % listed out for easy inputting into MS.

To my knowledge, those 117 injectors have the same valve as the 298 injectors that go into our 640 kit, so you can use the same dead time numbers. https://goflowforce.com/instructions
Old May 16, 2019 | 11:39 PM
  #16  
ConnorRigby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 2
Default

Thanks for the information. I'll try it out. I'm using the dead times as provided on a sheet of paper that came with my injectors. I'll try the 640 times
Old May 16, 2019 | 11:58 PM
  #17  
ConnorRigby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 2
Default

Thanks for the tip. I just used said dead times from the 640s and it seems to run smoother at idle. I did have a slightly hard time starting, but that can probably be attributed to my battery or alternator dying.
Old May 17, 2019 | 02:28 PM
  #18  
L337TurboZ's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 401
Total Cats: 35
From: Charleston, SC
Default

Originally Posted by ConnorRigby
Thanks for the tip. I just used said dead times from the 640s and it seems to run smoother at idle. I did have a slightly hard time starting, but that can probably be attributed to my battery or alternator dying.
You may need to adjust your Cranking Pulse or ASE if you're having a hard time starting it.
Old May 17, 2019 | 02:37 PM
  #19  
ConnorRigby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by L337TurboZ
You may need to adjust your Cranking Pulse or ASE if you're having a hard time starting it.
I actually figured this one out too. My cranking was set to 200 rpm for some reason so it would crank, and Ms would think the car was started. Also my alternator is dying, so night time driving causes the next start to be a little rough as the battery isn't quite charged enough.
Old May 17, 2019 | 03:26 PM
  #20  
SpartanSV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,232
Total Cats: 169
From: Greeley, CO
Default

Sorry I misposted.

Last edited by SpartanSV; May 17, 2019 at 03:59 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ByteVenom
MEGAsquirt
9
May 1, 2017 10:45 PM
Frenchmanremy
DIY Turbo Discussion
14
Apr 22, 2017 09:49 AM
503TurboPeru
MEGAsquirt
9
Sep 2, 2016 04:56 PM
mlev
MEGAsquirt
28
May 1, 2015 09:22 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM.