Notices
MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Stand alone or not????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #1  
j555pre's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 98
Total Cats: 0
From: Todmorden UK
Default Stand alone or not????

OK. I'm at the stage when I need to decide which way to go.

My car is currently a 1991 1.6 manual with a 1.8 1994 engine fitted. I have kept the 1.8 throttle body complete with 4 wire TPS. The A/C has been removed. I have fitted the toyota COP mod. Yellow RX8 injectors.

The car has not yet run in its presnet configuration and still has the 1991 ECU fitted.

I have kept the power steering.

Any ideas which is the best route to go and reasons? I have nearly finished my MS1 build.

I do not intend to return this car to stock. Ever!

I plan to run boost control and the improved spark mod.

Thanks
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #2  
WonTon's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

standalone!

/thread
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 06:08 PM
  #3  
chicksdigmiatas's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,498
Total Cats: 1
From: Texas, 'Murica
Default

Originally Posted by wonton
standalone!

/thread
+10000000000
Old Apr 20, 2010 | 01:05 AM
  #4  
JustinHoMi's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 273
Total Cats: 1
From: Hillsborough, NC
Default

The OEM handles idle better, but that's about it! AND with a little tuning you can get the MS to idle just fine
Old Apr 20, 2010 | 01:12 AM
  #5  
lordrigamus's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,482
Total Cats: 0
From: Tinley Park, IL
Default

Standalone for the win!
Old Apr 20, 2010 | 04:14 AM
  #6  
CRAIGO's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 272
Total Cats: 0
From: Manchester, UK
Default

Im intrigued as to why so many shout for standalone when all you are taking on is more time spent messing around with idle values and other mundane stuff.

I'm not having a go, I just find it amusing that having control over the fan, idle and AC etc makes it so much more "win" I'd rather just get on with tuning fuel and spark and let the OEM ecu do it fine job of handling idle, the fan, AC and any other mundane task.

Unless it's ***** waving rights - In which case, I'll get me coat...
Old Apr 20, 2010 | 06:39 PM
  #7  
lordrigamus's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,482
Total Cats: 0
From: Tinley Park, IL
Default

I took over the idle control primarily to compensate for having a lightweight flywheel. Allowing me to tune my idle as I see fit for better recovery and stability.

Secondly, I took control of my fans in the off chance I decide to run a cooler thermostat. I can trim my on/off temps to my liking.

I do however miss the factory A/C compensation but with the idle settings in Megasquirt it's a close second to factory.

After all that, I saw no need to keep the factory ecu just for the A/C. There's also the random issues with sharing sensor inputs. Since I no longer needed the factory ecu, I decided to remove it altogether.

I can see your point though, I suppose it's more of a "win" in my particular application. However, it did make my ***** bigger anyway.LOL

Cheerio mate

Last edited by lordrigamus; Apr 21, 2010 at 12:43 AM.
Old Apr 20, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #8  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Buy an MS3 and go full standalone. It is what all the cool kids are doing. And by all the cool kids I mean Braineack and I.
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 03:57 AM
  #9  
WestfieldMX5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 999
Total Cats: 73
From: Belgium
Default

Originally Posted by CRAIGO
Im intrigued as to why so many shout for standalone when all you are taking on is more time spent messing around with idle values and other mundane stuff.

I'm not having a go, I just find it amusing that having control over the fan, idle and AC etc makes it so much more "win" I'd rather just get on with tuning fuel and spark and let the OEM ecu do it fine job of handling idle, the fan, AC and any other mundane task.

Unless it's ***** waving rights - In which case, I'll get me coat...
I totally understand your point, and and thinking of doing just the same. Let the stock ecu handle idle and let the MS do the rest (can't have the stock ecu handle the fan because that circuit is broken inside the oem ecu). Removed the egr stuff already, so the stock ecu has nothing else to do other than idle.
Anyway, I was wondering how you go about this. Do you connect only the idle valve to the stock ecu and connect the injectors to the MS?
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 04:32 AM
  #10  
CRAIGO's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 272
Total Cats: 0
From: Manchester, UK
Default

That's how it is on my parellel set-up. I have GM CLT/IAT sensors and my MS vTPS is spliced into the stock TPS signal with zero issues. Ignition and injectors are solely MS controlled and crank/cam position via a retro-fitted CAS on the exhaust cam.
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 07:13 AM
  #11  
gospeed81's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
From: Spring, TX
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
Buy an MS3 and go full standalone. It is what all the cool kids are doing. And by all the cool kids I mean Braineack and I.
I lold


OP, go standalone and don't ever look back. Best day of MS tuning was when I took the car to my uncle's shop for some suspension and clutch work (borrowed lift). I was listing off some of the things I'd done, and while sitting in the car handed him the OEM ECU and proceeded to start the car. The look on his face was priceless (he always thought I was an idiot).

Anyhow, the Mazda piece is a paperweight.
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 03:18 PM
  #12  
j555pre's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 98
Total Cats: 0
From: Todmorden UK
Default

Ok I think standalone wins for me.

Thanks everyone. Since the OEM ecu was for the 1.6 and I've fitted the 1.8 I presume it wouldn't work with the IAC anyway as I've kept the 1.8 Throttle body etc. I just hope I can find my way through this maxe and out the other side.
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #13  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
Buy an MS3 and go full standalone. It is what all the cool kids are doing. And by all the cool kids I mean Braineack and I.

And by all the kids I mean I....


LEARN TO SPEAK ENGRISH SON!
Old May 31, 2010 | 03:39 AM
  #14  
j555pre's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 98
Total Cats: 0
From: Todmorden UK
Default

So can I use the 4 wire TPS on my 1.8 TB with my MS1?

Is this a variable TPS?

Thanks
Old May 31, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #15  
timk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,278
Total Cats: 37
From: Brisbane, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by j555pre
So can I use the 4 wire TPS on my 1.8 TB with my MS1?

Is this a variable TPS?
Yes to both, with the appropriate wiring.
Old May 31, 2010 | 08:54 AM
  #16  
j555pre's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 98
Total Cats: 0
From: Todmorden UK
Default

Thanks, I'll have to alter the wiring as it is currently setup to use the 1.6 ECU.

Do I just run a spare 4th wire back to the MS and use the existing 3 in the standard cars loom?
Old May 31, 2010 | 10:37 AM
  #17  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by j555pre
Do I just run a spare 4th wire back to the MS and use the existing 3 in the standard cars loom?


Zardoz has spoken.


Seriously, though. The fourth lead on the '94-'97 TPSs is an idle switch closure, just like the 1.6 cars had. (On the NB, they finally dropped this.)

With the MS, you don't need this contact. In fact, the MS wouldn't know what to do with it. All you need are the three wires associated with the analog potentiometer section. Specifically, the green/white wire comes from the MS's Vref (+5) supply pin, the black/blue wire is ground, and the red/black wire is the variable signal that goes to the MS's TPS input.
Old May 31, 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #18  
j555pre's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 98
Total Cats: 0
From: Todmorden UK
Default

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Definately stuck in my mind now.

Thanks Joe and thanks Zardoz
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EricJ
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
7
Sep 11, 2021 11:10 PM
mgeoffriau
Gaming
38
Mar 2, 2016 03:59 PM
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
Sep 5, 2015 08:02 AM
1993z32
Engine Performance
11
Sep 4, 2015 11:18 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.