Standalone MS and factory immobilizer 99+ ?
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Schwarzenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,554
Total Cats: 101
Standalone MS and factory immobilizer 99+ ?
Hi,
as usual - one more question to ask
When I go standalone I'd like to know what happens with my factory immobilizer? I don't know how often this is in your US cars - but for Germany all 99+ cars are equiped with this factory immobilizer unit. (Circuit from 99 wiring diagram attached)
I suppose I have to bridge it somehow, because I think it works like this - send a signal to the ECU - receive an answer - correct ECU - car stays running. (With an wrong answer - i.e. other ECU it stalls the car after 3 sec.)
Any experience with this?
Thanks
Greets
Sven
as usual - one more question to ask
When I go standalone I'd like to know what happens with my factory immobilizer? I don't know how often this is in your US cars - but for Germany all 99+ cars are equiped with this factory immobilizer unit. (Circuit from 99 wiring diagram attached)
I suppose I have to bridge it somehow, because I think it works like this - send a signal to the ECU - receive an answer - correct ECU - car stays running. (With an wrong answer - i.e. other ECU it stalls the car after 3 sec.)
Any experience with this?
Thanks
Greets
Sven
#2
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: VA, Germany, Afghanistan
Posts: 2,945
Total Cats: 3
Sorry I don't have an answer to your question, but I do have a question for you...What exactly does this feature accomplish? The car will start only with the correct ECU if I'm understanding you correctly.
#3
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Schwarzenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,554
Total Cats: 101
It is even more than that - it's the combination of three things - the key, the immobilizer unit and the ecu. All three things have to belong together. There is a transponder inside the key, which is read by a coil next to the lock, the immobilizer reads this transponder and the "whatever" of the ECU. It is a mayor pita to learn a new key to the existing ECU or the other way round.
Greets
Greets
#6
I identify as a bear.
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,102
Total Cats: 6,636
There is nothing magical about the immobilizer. Since you are removing the stock ECU and installing a Megasquirt, you are defeating the authority of the stock immobilizer. The Megasquirt will continue driving the injectors and the ignition system regardless of what the immobilizer does.
My US-spec '99 manual does not have this circuit, so my apologies if I'm a bit slow at understanding. I assume that the device marked "SPULE" is the coil around the lock which reads the key. Given this, the immobilizer has only two other I/O ports. One goes to the instrument cluster, which I presume simply illuminates a lamp that says "SECURITY" (or whatever the correct translation into German would be) and the other line goes to the ECU, presumably to disable it.
Thus, if the ECU is not there, then the immobilizer has no teeth. It cannot shut down a Megasquirt, as the two devices do not speak the same language.
My US-spec '99 manual does not have this circuit, so my apologies if I'm a bit slow at understanding. I assume that the device marked "SPULE" is the coil around the lock which reads the key. Given this, the immobilizer has only two other I/O ports. One goes to the instrument cluster, which I presume simply illuminates a lamp that says "SECURITY" (or whatever the correct translation into German would be) and the other line goes to the ECU, presumably to disable it.
Thus, if the ECU is not there, then the immobilizer has no teeth. It cannot shut down a Megasquirt, as the two devices do not speak the same language.
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 1,361
Total Cats: 17
I can't see a wiring diagram in your post, but I'm at work so it's possible it's blocked for me ATM.
Many early immobilizer systems (mid-late 90s) were just between the key and the ECU. If the ECU doesn't get the right code, it doesn't supply fuel, spark, etc. In that case, since the immobilization is done by the ECU, then going standalone would remove the immobilizing function and it wouldn't be an issue. [EDIT: So yeah, what Joe already said.] The point of these is simply to prevent theft, and really, what thief tries to replace a car's ECU before stealing it? Ford systems were of this type, so based on the close relationship between Ford and Mazda, I'm guessing yours is this way.
I've heard that some of the newfangled systems are in a separate box from the ECU, and require signals from both the key and the ECU. From what little I've read on the subject, these are basically relay boxes that don't allow power to the starter/fuel pump/ignition circuit(s) unless they receive the right codes from multiple sources. If this is the case, you'll have to either A) find the box and bypass the relays, or B) leave the stock ECU in for the sole purpose of sending the code to it while the MS does everything else.
Many early immobilizer systems (mid-late 90s) were just between the key and the ECU. If the ECU doesn't get the right code, it doesn't supply fuel, spark, etc. In that case, since the immobilization is done by the ECU, then going standalone would remove the immobilizing function and it wouldn't be an issue. [EDIT: So yeah, what Joe already said.] The point of these is simply to prevent theft, and really, what thief tries to replace a car's ECU before stealing it? Ford systems were of this type, so based on the close relationship between Ford and Mazda, I'm guessing yours is this way.
I've heard that some of the newfangled systems are in a separate box from the ECU, and require signals from both the key and the ECU. From what little I've read on the subject, these are basically relay boxes that don't allow power to the starter/fuel pump/ignition circuit(s) unless they receive the right codes from multiple sources. If this is the case, you'll have to either A) find the box and bypass the relays, or B) leave the stock ECU in for the sole purpose of sending the code to it while the MS does everything else.
#8
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Schwarzenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,554
Total Cats: 101
Hi Joe, your German gets along nicely.
I think it is like Scott assumed last - the ECU cuts the power supply to the Fuel pump, ECU etc.
I think the ports called J & L in the circuit are a kind of power switch to the main relais. Could this be possible?
Thanks
I think it is like Scott assumed last - the ECU cuts the power supply to the Fuel pump, ECU etc.
I think the ports called J & L in the circuit are a kind of power switch to the main relais. Could this be possible?
Thanks
#9
I identify as a bear.
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,102
Total Cats: 6,636
My German is terrible, but the schematic symbol for a coil of wire is the same in every language.
Yes, it appears that the Immobilizer merely sends a signal to the ECU commanding it not to turn on (or perhaps permitting it to turn on when authorized by the key). In either case, without the ECU in place, this signal is meaningless.
Let me think about that...
Both of those circuits are present in all Miatas. The one marked (J) is active at all times, and supplies power to a number of non-critical devices in the vehicle, such as the radio (to retain settings), the gauge cluster, the interior lamps, and so on.
The one marked (L) is the primary power feed to the ECU, the ignition coils, and the control coil of the main relay. If the 15A "ENGINE" fuse were opened, then the engine would not run. I suppose it is theoretically possible that the immobilizer could intentionally blow this fuse to completely disable the vehicle (by shorting it to ground through a relay) however I doubt that Mazda would design it in such a way. I suspect that it is connected only so that the Immobilizer knows when to communicate with the ECU.
For anyone else who cares, here is the service manual for the immobilizer: http://quadesl.com/pdf/immoblizer.pdf
I think it is like Scott assumed last - the ECU cuts the power supply to the Fuel pump, ECU etc.
I think the ports called J & L in the circuit are a kind of power switch to the main relais. Could this be possible?
Both of those circuits are present in all Miatas. The one marked (J) is active at all times, and supplies power to a number of non-critical devices in the vehicle, such as the radio (to retain settings), the gauge cluster, the interior lamps, and so on.
The one marked (L) is the primary power feed to the ECU, the ignition coils, and the control coil of the main relay. If the 15A "ENGINE" fuse were opened, then the engine would not run. I suppose it is theoretically possible that the immobilizer could intentionally blow this fuse to completely disable the vehicle (by shorting it to ground through a relay) however I doubt that Mazda would design it in such a way. I suspect that it is connected only so that the Immobilizer knows when to communicate with the ECU.
For anyone else who cares, here is the service manual for the immobilizer: http://quadesl.com/pdf/immoblizer.pdf
#10
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Schwarzenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,554
Total Cats: 101
O.K. I will give it a try and see, what happens.
I don't think it is intended to blow a fuse - I just thought it would cut the power to the main relay or such.
We'll see.
Danke Joe
I don't think it is intended to blow a fuse - I just thought it would cut the power to the main relay or such.
We'll see.
Danke Joe
#11
I identify as a bear.
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,102
Total Cats: 6,636
Originally Posted by Zaphod
I don't think it is intended to blow a fuse - I just thought it would cut the power to the main relay or such.
It cannot disable the Main Relay, as that is not controlled by the ECU or the Immobilizer. Here is a drawing of the main relay circuit in which I've removed all the non-relevant information, and I think this is the same for all cars (both Euro and US), whether or not they have the immobilizer:
You can see that the key switch provides power directly to the main relay coil whenever the key is on. The immobilizer is not installed in such a way that it could interrupt this path.
Danke Joe
#12
So what type of a sigmal does the pats module actually sent the pcm i mean passkey 3sends a pwm signal to the pcm on the blue wire black stripe pin 11 on the blue connecter i believe. What i have found with that system is you can ground unground that wire 3times and the car will stay running
the pcm was looking for a voltage change but i cant cant any info on how the pats mod sends to the pcm or what yhe pcm is looking for so they can agree on what they see as a key code it has yo be some kind of voltage signal digital swuare wave or analog sign wave
O
the pcm was looking for a voltage change but i cant cant any info on how the pats mod sends to the pcm or what yhe pcm is looking for so they can agree on what they see as a key code it has yo be some kind of voltage signal digital swuare wave or analog sign wave
O
#14
My German is terrible, but the schematic symbol for a coil of wire is the same in every language.
Yes, it appears that the Immobilizer merely sends a signal to the ECU commanding it not to turn on (or perhaps permitting it to turn on when authorized by the key). In either case, without the ECU in place, this signal is meaningless.
Let me think about that...
Both of those circuits are present in all Miatas. The one marked (J) is active at all times, and supplies power to a number of non-critical devices in the vehicle, such as the radio (to retain settings), the gauge cluster, the interior lamps, and so on.
The one marked (L) is the primary power feed to the ECU, the ignition coils, and the control coil of the main relay. If the 15A "ENGINE" fuse were opened, then the engine would not run. I suppose it is theoretically possible that the immobilizer could intentionally blow this fuse to completely disable the vehicle (by shorting it to ground through a relay) however I doubt that Mazda would design it in such a way. I suspect that it is connected only so that the Immobilizer knows when to communicate with the ECU.
For anyone else who cares, here is the service manual for the immobilizer: http://quadesl.com/pdf/immoblizer.pdf
Yes, it appears that the Immobilizer merely sends a signal to the ECU commanding it not to turn on (or perhaps permitting it to turn on when authorized by the key). In either case, without the ECU in place, this signal is meaningless.
Let me think about that...
Both of those circuits are present in all Miatas. The one marked (J) is active at all times, and supplies power to a number of non-critical devices in the vehicle, such as the radio (to retain settings), the gauge cluster, the interior lamps, and so on.
The one marked (L) is the primary power feed to the ECU, the ignition coils, and the control coil of the main relay. If the 15A "ENGINE" fuse were opened, then the engine would not run. I suppose it is theoretically possible that the immobilizer could intentionally blow this fuse to completely disable the vehicle (by shorting it to ground through a relay) however I doubt that Mazda would design it in such a way. I suspect that it is connected only so that the Immobilizer knows when to communicate with the ECU.
For anyone else who cares, here is the service manual for the immobilizer: http://quadesl.com/pdf/immoblizer.pdf
#15
So what type of a sigmal does the pats module actually sent the pcm i mean passkey 3sends a pwm signal to the pcm on the blue wire black stripe pin 11 on the blue connecter i believe. What i have found with that system is you can ground unground that wire 3times and the car will stay running
the pcm was looking for a voltage change but i cant cant any info on how the pats mod sends to the pcm or what yhe pcm is looking for so they can agree on what they see as a key code it has yo be some kind of voltage signal digital swuare wave or analog sign wave
O
the pcm was looking for a voltage change but i cant cant any info on how the pats mod sends to the pcm or what yhe pcm is looking for so they can agree on what they see as a key code it has yo be some kind of voltage signal digital swuare wave or analog sign wave
O
https://www.searchautoparts.com/motorage/scope-scan
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post