Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   MEGAsquirt (https://www.miataturbo.net/megasquirt-18/)
-   -   A summary of the Megasquirt family for newcomers (https://www.miataturbo.net/megasquirt-18/summary-megasquirt-family-newcomers-81522/)

Joe Perez 10-18-2014 02:56 PM

A summary of the Megasquirt family for newcomers
 
14 Attachment(s)
This question seems to come up a lot, so I'm creating a sticky that I can point people to in the future. This is current as of Oct 2014, and will (hopefully) be updated as time goes on.

Note that I am focusing only on offerings from DIYAutoTune, which is considered by most to comprise the "mainstream" MS product line. There are also some excellent Miata-specific MS-based ECUs available from MSLabs, however I am not particularly knowledgeable about those.

Also, since the question comes up a lot: no aftermarket ECU will return OBD-II codes, and this includes the MS family. Those of you who live in areas where plug-in emissions testing is performed on '96 and newer vehicles will need to deal with that. Many people swap ECUs (and injectors, etc) once ever year or two, a few die-hards come up with custom "parallel" solutions that place the MS beside the stock ECU, letting the former run the engine and the latter talk to the OBD-II test station. This is very hard to do right.



Now, the breakdown:


Absolute cheapest: MS1, the original:

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1413658584
MegaSquirt I Kits Megasquirt Kits / Assembled Engine Management Systems, Wideband o2 Sensor Systems and tuning products - DIYAutoTune.com

For $219, you get a box of parts that you solder together yourself, and is then useless until you do a bunch of additional custom and poorly-documented modifications and also construct a new wiring harness from scratch. This is how we all used to do it, and none of us do anymore. This unit uses a 30 year old CPU running a software package that leaves much to be desired, on a circuit board that was originally designed to run throttle-body injection with a distributor and uses some really lousy, sub-optimal circuit designs. So don't do it.

Just don't.




Also ran: MS2, the original:

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1413658584
MegaSquirt II Kits Megasquirt Kits / Assembled Engine Management Systems, Wideband o2 Sensor Systems and tuning products - DIYAutoTune.com

MS2 places a new CPU onto the same crappy old circuit board as MS1. The software sucks somewhat less, but it's otherwise the same old shit where you've gotta do a bunch of custom modifications to the board and live with crappy circuit design.




DIYPnP:

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1413658584
DIYPNP Nippon Denso 76pin Unassembled Kit DIYAutoTune.com

Now we're getting somewhere.

The same CPU as the MS2, on a new board, with less-bad circuit design. Decent software, and once it's assembled you have a plug-and-play solution with no harness fab needed. A good choice if you're skilled with a soldering iron, a terrible idea if you're not.





MSIII:

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1413658584
MegaSquirt III Kits and Assembled ECUs Megasquirt Kits / Assembled Engine Management Systems, Wideband o2 Sensor Systems and tuning products - DIYAutoTune.com

Yet another new CPU tacked onto the same old circuit board from the MS1. This also adds the "X" expansion board, which finally adds native support for multiple ignition coils and injectors, PWM-based idle valves, etc., meaning you no longer have to do a bunch of custom modifications internally. Sadly, it still retains some of the crappy circuit topology from the original 1990s vintage MS1 design and you still have to build your own harness. This is an intermediate step in the right direction; cutting-edge software married to trailing-edge hardware.

To be avoided by all but the most hard-core techie types.





MSPnP2:

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1413658584
MegaSquirtPNP Plug-and-Play MegaSquirt Engine Management Systems by DIYAutoTune Megasquirt Kits / Assembled Engine Management Systems, Wideband o2 Sensor Systems and tuning products - DIYAutoTune.com

This is essentially a fully pre-built version of the DIYPnP. Based on the MS2 CPU, it's an excellent choice for the '90-'00 Miatas.





MS3 Pro:

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1413658584
MS3-Pro Megasquirt Kits / Assembled Engine Management Systems, Wideband o2 Sensor Systems and tuning products - DIYAutoTune.com

Tits.

A generic, non plug-n-play ECU based on the MS3 CPU, but with completely new circuit board from the ground up which carries over none of the shitty circuit design from the original MS1. (They even "borrowed" the crank decoder circuit design that we came up with on this forum a couple of years earlier.) This will fit any car, but requires harness-building like the old ones. Expensive and worth every penny, easily the best universal ECU on the market today. I had the privilege of running a beta version of this on my old 1990 car, and loved it.




MSPnP Pro:

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1413658584
MegaSquirtPNP Pro MM0105 for the 01-05 Mazda Miata, manual trans DIYAutoTune.com

Tits, in plug-n-play form.

Only available (for now) for the '01-'05 cars (a separate version exists for the '04-'05 Mazdaspeed). Based on the MS3 Pro design and software. The best plug-n-play available for the later-model cars.

sixshooter 10-19-2014 09:22 PM

For posterity:

Originally Posted by Joe Perez (Post 1176845)
Well, in this context, the term MS3 can be used to describe a whole family of ECUs which share a common core architecture.

In its most basic form, the MS3 is a certain CPU and a specific set of software that runs on it. There is an ECU which we call the MS3, which is the basic model built around this CPU, and can be used by hardcore tech types as the foundation for building a complete ECU for a custom application. I've put a few of them into race cars.

Then there are a number of other ECUs which are based on the MS3 CPU and software, but on a custom circuit board typically designed for a specific application.

The MS3Pro and MSPnP Pro are examples of this. DIYAutoTune took the basic MS3 CPU and used it as the core of a very advanced and capable set of ECUs which are proprietary to DIY.

(Yes, the fact that there's a company called DIY, which sells products with DIY in their name, makes things confusing when we're literally taking about do-it-yourself ECU builds, as I've built in the past for myself and others.)

The MSLabs products are similar in concept to the more advanced models sold by DIY. Reverant, like DIY, designs and builds ECUs which utilize the basic MS2 and MS3 CPUs at their core, but place them on a board which adds a host of advanced features not available on the "basic" design. The only reason I didn't go into any detail about them here is that I simply don't have any hands-on experience with them.


JasonC SBB 10-21-2014 11:24 AM

Anyone want to write a summary of Reverant's and Braineack's stuff?

psyber_0ptix 10-21-2014 11:43 AM


Originally Posted by Joe Perez (Post 1176665)
So don't so it.

Just don't.





Originally Posted by JasonC SBB (Post 1177314)
Anyone want to write a summary of Reverant's and Braineack's stuff?


Scott's stuff is the DIYAutoTune MS3 DIY kit isnt it? He just offers his electrical genius to inept folks like myself.

shuiend 10-21-2014 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by JasonC SBB (Post 1177314)
Anyone want to write a summary of Reverant's and Braineack's stuff?

Braineack simply assembles what DIYAutoTune sells so you do not have to.

Braineack 10-21-2014 12:53 PM

correct.

Efini~FC3S 10-21-2014 04:39 PM

+1 for someone including Reverants stuff in here.

The noobs...they need to know what he offers

matthewdesigns 10-21-2014 05:20 PM

As I'm a heretic and do not run MS in my car, a question:

Do all versions of MS, from the shitty to the shiny, allow for both fuel and timing control?

sixshooter 10-21-2014 05:36 PM

All the ones designed for Miatas do but you can leave off one or the other if you are building your own.

matthewdesigns 10-21-2014 05:40 PM

Great, thank you.

Joe Perez 10-21-2014 05:42 PM


Originally Posted by matthewdesigns (Post 1177492)
Do all versions of MS, from the shitty to the shiny, allow for both fuel and timing control?

The "basic" versions of the MS1 and MS2 ECU were originally intended to function with a distributor, and custom (but well-documented) internal modifications are required in order to drive COP-type ignition.

Likewise, no version of the MS1 is capable of running more than two injector channels (meaning you must run batch-injection), and basic MS2s require custom modification to drive more than two injector channels.

All ECUs based on the MS3, as well as the more advanced MS2-based units, come out of the box ready to drive four (or more) injector channels, and two (or more) ignition channels.

matthewdesigns 10-21-2014 05:54 PM

So it is possible to control timing with the low end units if they were built specifically for a Miata? Or did I misunderstand Sixshooter's response as actually being either/or, rather than both are achievable in the same unit?

shuiend 10-21-2014 06:05 PM


Originally Posted by matthewdesigns (Post 1177508)
So it is possible to control timing with the low end units if they were built specifically for a Miata? Or did I misunderstand Sixshooter's response as actually being either/or, rather than both are achievable in the same unit?

Yes you can make the lowest end MS1 control fuel and spark for a miata.

Joe Perez 10-21-2014 06:18 PM


Originally Posted by matthewdesigns (Post 1177508)
So it is possible to control timing with the low end units if they were built specifically for a Miata?

Yes. Having performed suitable internal modifications to bring out two ignition channels, then yes, the MS1 will control both fuel and ignition directly.

I was going to link you to the specific thread in which I described an advanced version of this mod, however I see that ImageFrame has fucked me yet again, and all of my diagrams are gone. I'll see if I can resurrect those sometime next week after I'm back home.

That said, don't build an MS1. Seriously, God kills a kitten every time you even think about it.

matthewdesigns 10-21-2014 07:12 PM

No intentions to build one at this point, just asking questions while I have the opportunity. Thanks!

shuiend 10-22-2014 04:07 PM


Originally Posted by Joe Perez (Post 1177518)
Yes. Having performed suitable internal modifications to bring out two ignition channels, then yes, the MS1 will control both fuel and ignition directly.

I was going to link you to the specific thread in which I described an advanced version of this mod, however I see that ImageFrame has fucked me yet again, and all of my diagrams are gone. I'll see if I can resurrect those sometime next week after I'm back home.

That said, don't build an MS1. Seriously, God kills a kitten every time you even think about it.

What are you talking about Joe, you simply do the kingofl337 mods for spark, add some switches to the side of the case so you can switch fuel/spark back to the stock ecu, and enjoy living in 2007. :giggle::giggle::giggle:

concealer404 10-22-2014 04:20 PM

I didn't realize that MS3/MS3x was still on the same old crappy board. So if you already have a DIYPNP, there's no reason at all to upgrade to anything but an MS3Pro if you wanted to stay in the Megasquirt family?

Roda 10-22-2014 08:15 PM

Thanks for putting this together, definitely helpful!

Two noob questions:

1. It appears that the MS3 Pro is only available assembled?

2. It should be possible to build a "PNP" jumper harness for the MS3 Pro using the DIYBOB ND76pin to connect to the factory 1.6 harness?

Joe Perez 10-22-2014 09:34 PM

Clearly I need to update this thread to include a preface which discusses the CPUs themselves, and talks a bit about the 3.0 / 3.57 mainboards... So little time.



Originally Posted by concealer404 (Post 1177726)
I didn't realize that MS3/MS3x was still on the same old crappy board.

The base version of the MS3/X (the one that uses DB-37 connectors) uses the same Rev 3.0 or 3.57 PCB as the MS1 did. Thus, while it offloads much of the functionality (spark, INJ, idle, etc) to the X board, it uses the same brain-dead CKP input circuit, and includes a second, equally bad copy of it on the X board for CMP.

This is one of the biggest reasons why Bruce and Al need to be tortured to death and then have their graves desecrated by the surviving members of GWAR.





Originally Posted by concealer404 (Post 1177726)
So if you already have a DIYPNP, there's no reason at all to upgrade to anything but an MS3Pro if you wanted to stay in the Megasquirt family?

I'd say that's a reasonable assertion, though of course the MS3Pro, not being a PnP ECU, targets a somewhat different audience.

If you have a '90-'00 car with the original engine, then the DIYPnP or MSPnP2 are really all you need. The only reason* I'd upgrade to an MS3Pro for these cars would be if you are running an '01+ engine, so you can control the VVT natively.

If you have a whole '01-'05, car, then I'd recommend the MSPnP Pro, which is an MS3Pro in plug-n-play form.
* = or if DIY gives it to you basically for nothing, which is how I got mine.



Originally Posted by Roda (Post 1177770)
Two noob questions:

1. It appears that the MS3 Pro is only available assembled?

2. It should be possible to build a "PNP" jumper harness for the MS3 Pro using the DIYBOB ND76pin to connect to the factory 1.6 harness?

1: Correct. The MS3Pro, unlike most of its predecessors, is sort of a "closed box" system. It is available only fully assembled, and really, there's very little reason you'd need to be inside the case, other than to install pullup resistors on the crank and cam sensor lines. (Suggestion to DIY: Make these software-selectable via an AQW212 controlled by some of the ten-gajillion surplus GPO pins available.)

2: That's not a question. But it's extremely easy to adapt the MS3Pro's included generic harness to pretty much any vehicle wiring harness. Here's what mine looked like plugged into the factory harness in my 1990:

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...-installed-jpg

Roda 10-22-2014 09:51 PM

Thanks!

greddygalant 10-22-2014 10:29 PM

Great thread, wish this was around a couple years ago for my newb ass to read

concealer404 10-23-2014 10:39 AM


Originally Posted by Joe Perez (Post 1177778)
I'd say that's a reasonable assertion, though of course the MS3Pro, not being a PnP ECU, targets a somewhat different audience.

If you have a '90-'00 car with the original engine, then the DIYPnP or MSPnP2 are really all you need. The only reason* I'd upgrade to an MS3Pro for these cars would be if you are running an '01+ engine, so you can control the VVT natively.

I'm not a fan of PNPs in the first place, so the PNP on my own car wouldn't have been something i would have done, personally.

Car in question is a 95 with a 99-00 head, but running with the old CAS and shit, because 95 DIYPNP.

I find this annoying, but not sure if it's annoying enough to pony up for an MS3Pro at the moment. Annoying to assembly my own MS3X if it was a step up? Yeah. Maybe.

But it's not, so nope. Bummer.

Joe Perez 10-23-2014 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by concealer404 (Post 1177916)
Car in question is a 95 with a 99-00 head, but running with the old CAS and shit, because 95 DIYPNP.

I find this annoying, but not sure if it's annoying enough to pony up for an MS3Pro at the moment.

Since you don't have VVT, either an MS2 or MS3-based ECU will work fine for you, and allow you to skip the old CAS and run the engine's native crank and cam sensors. This would include the DIYPnP, which is based on the MS2 CPU (via the MicroSquirt Module).

Translation: assuming you already own a DIYPnP, you don't need to use the CAS. Just fix your shit.

concealer404 10-23-2014 11:11 AM

Well yes. :)

The point was getting to build a new harness from scratch and not be limited to the DIYPNP connector at the ECU.

The easy button is just changing the what.... 2? 3? wires to run the native 99-00 trigger shiz. But then i still have a PNP running on a 20 year old molested harness.

Either way, suppose i should start sourcing parts and go from there. I appreciate the clarification. Props given!

Braineack 10-23-2014 11:21 AM

there's no limitation with the diypnp connector, it's acutally easier to populate/build/change compared to the db37 style.

the only differnce betweena 91-93, 94-95, 96-97, and 99-00 is how you run the jumper wires inside the case to the harness. All are built on the same 76 pin connector.

if you want to run a 99-00 head and remove the CAS, the changes would external to the MS, and then just a software parameter change. No internal mods to the MS would have to be made.

Joe Perez 10-23-2014 12:02 PM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1177934)
if you want to run a 99-00 head and remove the CAS, the changes would external to the MS, and then just a software parameter change. No internal mods to the MS would have to be made.

^ This.

All you need to do is go under the hood and move the wires that presently hit the CAS to go to the crank and cam sensors instead. You'll split the power and ground to both sensors, run the white wire to the crank sensor, and the yellow wire to the cam sensor.

Then just fire up TunerStudio and tell the MS that it's now connected to a '99-00 Miata instead of a 4G63 Mitsu. You'll have to recalibrate the timing offset (can't remember what the MS2 calls this parameter) but aside from that no MS changes needed.

Now go forth and fix thy shit. :giggle:

concealer404 10-23-2014 12:07 PM

Neato! So basically... it'll take more time to get the crank trigger actually installed than it will to actually do the wiring and changes in settings.

I <3 this bar.

psyber_0ptix 10-23-2014 12:09 PM


Originally Posted by Joe Perez (Post 1177778)
If you have a '90-'00 car with the original engine, then the DIYPnP or MSPnP2 are really all you need. The only reason* I'd upgrade to an MS3Pro for these cars would be if you are running an '01+ engine, so you can control the VVT natively.

If you have a whole '01-'05, car, then I'd recommend the MSPnP Pro, which is an MS3Pro in plug-n-play form.

I thought MS3x could control VVT natively?

Joe Perez 10-23-2014 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by concealer404 (Post 1177959)
So basically... it'll take more time to get the crank trigger actually installed than it will to actually do the wiring and changes in settings.

Assuming that you suck at installing crank triggers, yes.




Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix (Post 1177962)
I thought MS3x could control VVT natively?

It can.

In the quote above, I am recommending the MS3Pro or MSPnP Pro (which are also MS3 based) as opposed to the MS2-based DIYPnP or MSPnP2, as those units cannot control VVT.

If you wish to do all of your own wiring and harness-building, and aren't offended by having an ECU that consists of a modern CPU module plugged into a badly-designed 15 year old mainboard with yet a third board hanging off the side to control most (but not all) of the I/O, and don't mind dealing with unreliable and hard-to-tune crank/cam trigger circuits, and prefer DB-37 connectors over something robust, and are a cheapskate, then by all means use the MS3X as opposed to the MS3Pro or MSPnP Pro.

The MS3X uses the same core CPU and runs the same software as the MS3Pro and MSPnP Pro, it's merely that the physical implementation of the MS3X sucks so badly that you'd think they deliberately designed it to be a piece of shit, as opposed to the truth which is merely that Bruce Bowling and Al Grippo are lazy, apathetic, paranoid assholes who prefer retaining backwards-compatibility with something that sucked when it was new and very few people actually care about anymore, as opposed to breaking free from the shackles of the past and designing a modern ECU properly from the ground up.

psyber_0ptix 10-23-2014 12:35 PM

I now feel inadequate with MS3x, yet it's still far above me that I think in my case, the end user is more outdated and shitty than the unit itself. I guess I'll carry on. :rofl:

PiazzaT 10-27-2014 10:46 AM

An alternative for the NA and the NB1 would be the WestfieldMX5 board for the MS3PRO Module

MS3-Pro Module - An EMS on a circuit board, for building your own systems

MS3 Pro pcb | Frank's Westfield MX5 MS3 Pro pcb |

Some DIY required

Matt Cramer 10-29-2014 12:55 PM


Originally Posted by concealer404 (Post 1177916)
I'm not a fan of PNPs in the first place, so the PNP on my own car wouldn't have been something i would have done, personally.

Car in question is a 95 with a 99-00 head, but running with the old CAS and shit, because 95 DIYPNP.

I find this annoying, but not sure if it's annoying enough to pony up for an MS3Pro at the moment. Annoying to assembly my own MS3X if it was a step up? Yeah. Maybe.

But it's not, so nope. Bummer.

The MS3 is a step up in processing power and feature set compared to the DIYPNP. The build it yourself version still uses the V3.0 / V3.57 board at present, but has a lot of extra I/O put on the MS3X card so the mods are less of a hack job than on earlier boards.

Trivia: The MS3-Pro was more or less the original MS3 design plan. The MS3 V3.0 / V3.57 option was put together as (1) a proof of concept that would allow us to test things out, and (2) because when the MS3 proposal came out, a lot of people wanted an upgrade path for the V3.0s.

huesmann 02-27-2015 09:19 AM

So what's the functional difference between the MS2 and MSPnP2? Former requires harness fab?

Braineack 02-27-2015 09:25 AM

the MSPNP2 runs on MS2--so there's no functional difference.

bahurd 02-27-2015 09:26 AM


Originally Posted by huesmann (Post 1210447)
So what's the functional difference between the MS2 and MSPnP2? Former requires harness fab?

You did read the very first post of this thread right?

huesmann 02-27-2015 09:31 AM


Originally Posted by bahurd (Post 1210451)
You did read the very first post of this thread right?

I did, and it didn't indicate a functional difference between the MS2, DIYPnP, and MSPnP2. Yet seemed to indicate that MSPnP2>DIYPnP>MS2, without giving specific reasons, other than DIY needs, well, DIY.

Braineack 02-27-2015 10:17 AM

MS2 is a CPU/software.

anything running MS2 (MSPNP2, DIYPNP, MS2 v3.0) can all be identical function wise.

MSPNP2 makes it easy--it's plug and play and turn key.
DIYPNP require assembly and still PNP once complete.
MS2 CPU on a v3.0 or v3.57 PCB requires assembly, harness, and in most cases added external circuits/modifications for basic functions of the above two.

Matt Cramer 02-27-2015 11:37 AM

Another thing that could use an update - we have now introduced MSPNP Pro units for '90-'93 and '94-'95 applications. '99-'00 is up next, and if there's enough interest, we could make a '96-'97.

aidandj 02-27-2015 11:43 AM

Will there ever be a diymspnp pro?

Braineack 02-27-2015 12:48 PM


Originally Posted by aidandj (Post 1210500)
Will there ever be a diymspnp pro?

It's called: ask Frank to make more connector boards.

aidandj 02-27-2015 12:48 PM

I thought the mspnp-pro had more features/speed/etc/etc.

Braineack 02-27-2015 12:59 PM

the MSPNPPRO utilizes the MS3-PRO module, yes.

Frank's PCB is pretty much a DIY-MS3PRO: MS3 Pro pcb V2.0 | Frank's Westfield MX5 MS3 Pro pcb V2.0 |

You'd buy a MS3-PRO module, build his PCB, bolt the module to his PCB, and then install--ultimately ending up with a "MSPNP-PRO".





I had a MS3-Pro, and just soldered a miata connector at the end of the supplied harness, and had it running within an hour.

aidandj 02-27-2015 01:01 PM

Ok, makes sense. Thanks

Reverant 02-27-2015 02:22 PM

12 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by Joe Perez (Post 1176665)
Note that I am focusing only on offerings from DIYAutoTune, which is considered by most to comprise the "mainstream" MS product line. There are also some excellent Miata-specific MS-based ECUs available from MSLabs, however I am not particularly knowledgeable about those.

Let me help. :)

Right now, we have 3 product lines

- The Basic MS2
- The Enhanced MS2
- The Basic MS3

These 3 lines are available for ALL the 90-05 Miata:

- 90-93 (US) and 94-97 1.6L (Europe and Japan, possibly elsewhere)
- 94-95 1.8L
- 96-97 1.8L
- 99-00 1.8L and 1.6L
- 01-05 1.8L and 1.6L
- 04-05 1.8L MSM (you haz trubo)

- The Basic MS2 is our entry-level plug and play ECU for the Miata/MX-5. This ECU has all the functionality necessary to run the engine without any performance loss (save for the 01-05 with the VVT). This includes controlling the fuel pump after removing the AFM, A/C with idle-up, etc. Basic EBC and simple table switching are also provided.

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1425064952https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1425064952


- The Enhanced MS2 is an MS2 on steroids. It has all the features any other MS2 has, and adds unique features, like:
+ OBD-II output
+ Digital wideband input for a perfect, error/noise-free AFR input
+ VSS input
+ Dual fan control with idle-up
+ Advanced A/C support
+ Advanced knock control with bandpass filters, knock windowing and adjustable thresholds per RPM
+ EGT input
* Sequential ignition AND injection
+ Adjustable alternator control (99-05)
+ Immobilizer support (01-05)
+ Dedicated VICS/VTCS outputs (99-05)
+ Advanced boost control with 2 open loops tables (select with an external switch), 1 closed loop table, open loop boost by gear
+ Oil pressure input
+ Oil temperature input
+ Valet mode
+ Power steering idle-up
+ Advanced launch mode
+ Independently enabled flatshift
+ CEL warnings for overheating, knocking, low oil pressure, high oil temperature, high EGTs
+ TEN terminal input to easily set the base timing and idle
* Realtime barometric correction
* 2 free programmable outputs

All features with a (+) are EXCLUSIVE to the Enhanced MS2 - no other MS2-based ECU has these.

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1425064952https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1425064952


The Basic MS3 - despite it's humble name - is a full-fledged MS3 ECU. It has everything you would expect it to have:
- Sequential injection
- Sequential ignition
- Dual fan control
- A/C control
- VICS/VTCS output
- Electronic boost control
- VVT control
- Advanced knock control with knock windowing
- VSS input
- E85 sensor input
- 3 free programmable outputs
- 5 free analog inputs with selectable internal pull-ups
- Alternator & battery light control (99-05)
- SD Card datalogging with real-time clock and internal battery backup. The SD card slot is accessible so that you can pop card in at any time without opening the case.
- USB and serial port

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1425064952https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1425064952

Feel free to PM me with any questions on these ECUs.

Dimitris

WestfieldMX5 03-02-2015 06:33 AM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1210539)
It's called: ask Frank to make more connector boards.

I don't have immediate plans to do so. I have a new (V3) design ready, but there's no demand for them. I'm actually a bit surprised as this solution is a fair bit cheaper. Mine is running fine on V1 still, so no need to have them fabricated for my own car.

Braineack 03-02-2015 09:59 AM

yeah you save roughly $200-250 or so and have a really slick case --definitely the best option for NB owners.

Matt Cramer 03-02-2015 02:38 PM


Originally Posted by aidandj (Post 1210500)
Will there ever be a diymspnp pro?

We've considered it, but the cost came to very close to the price of a ready to run MSPNP Pro. Currently if you want a build it yourself, PNP solution based on MS3, your best bet is a MS3 V3.0 kit plus DIYBOB.

aidandj 03-02-2015 02:42 PM

Thats what I have already. I was interested I'm the speed and features of the pro. Then I realized you already had a pro module. Which is 850$.

ofspunk7 03-02-2015 03:28 PM


Originally Posted by Reverant (Post 1210586)
Let me help. :)

... edited to save page ...

I think adding Rev's post to the 1st post may be a good idea, vs page 3.

concealer404 03-15-2015 02:26 AM

I have a fun list of requirements, what to buy?

1) Knock detection/control. I was really impressed with the knock sensing/control options on hhammerly's car. I want that.
2) I do NOT want PNP in any form. I need to build a new harness.
3) As cheap as possible, as expensive as necessary

What buy? I feel like the DIYPNP is the value leader in the original post, but i do NOT want the PNP portion of it. Is there an option with that cpu/board that isn't?

elior77 03-15-2015 09:57 AM


Originally Posted by ofspunk7 (Post 1211474)
I think adding Rev's post to the 1st post may be a good idea, vs page 3.

Yes

Braineack 03-15-2015 02:07 PM


Originally Posted by concealer404 (Post 1215063)
What buy? I feel like the DIYPNP is the value leader in the original post, but i do NOT want the PNP portion of it. Is there an option with that cpu/board that isn't?

a microsquirt module/ecu?

http://www.msextra.com/doc/pdf/Micro...rdware-3.3.pdf

Reverant 03-15-2015 02:15 PM

Outside of the Enhanced MS2, no other MS2-based ECU that I know of has good knock control (or even decent to be honest). This includes all Microsquirt module variants.

aidandj 03-15-2015 02:22 PM

Why not MS3+MS3x?

concealer404 03-15-2015 08:42 PM

I'm not against it. Was mostly trying to see what the cheapest option for my needs would be.

Rev, do you do ms2e in NOT pnp form?

Braineack 03-15-2015 09:14 PM

The microsquirt ECU is $300. that's going to be your cheapest:easiest option far from building a v3.0 board with a MS2 daughterboard at $280. both will require a harness to be built, the microsquirt will need some pullups for your cmp/cmk signals and a MAP sensor.

Savington 03-16-2015 12:16 AM


Originally Posted by concealer404 (Post 1215209)

Rev, do you do ms2e in NOT pnp form?

Buy the MS2E + buy OEM connectors and pins + build your own harness

aidandj 03-16-2015 12:18 AM

If you can build your own harness you can build your own MS3.

concealer404 03-16-2015 06:58 AM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1215219)
The microsquirt ECU is $300. that's going to be your cheapest:easiest option far from building a v3.0 board with a MS2 daughterboard at $280. both will require a harness to be built, the microsquirt will need some pullups for your cmp/cmk signals and a MAP sensor.

Rev said this is no bueno for knock things. True?


Originally Posted by Savington (Post 1215242)
Buy the MS2E + buy OEM connectors and pins + build your own harness

I don't want OEM connectors. That's added expense and hassle where not necessary. Would prefer to use something like the DIY AT 8' flying lead for simplicity's sake.


Originally Posted by aidandj (Post 1215244)
If you can build your own harness you can build your own MS3.

True, i CAN. And maybe i will. I think i was just hoping that a pre-built MS2 would satisfy my needs, but it seems that it won't.

cyotani 03-24-2015 11:45 AM

Can anyone comment on the advantages/disadvantages of the the MSPNP pro and the mslabs basic ms3?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands