Notices
MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Tuning for Bigger Injectors, why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2010 | 11:47 PM
  #1  
D.dutton9512's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 166
Total Cats: 0
From: Atlanta GA
Default Tuning for Bigger Injectors, why?

When I installed my MSPNP I installed larger 320cc injectors. However I never changed the "req fuel" settings so it still thinks I have the stock ones in.

I've tuned my car pretty well and I'm happy with it now (other than the occasional adjustment to idle or cruise). I recently changed the req fuel to the correct number for my injectors and the car went very lean, undrivable. I also noticed that my req fuel for the stock ones is ~9.2 and for the 320cc's its 13.2. If I understand correctly and req fuel stands for "required fuel" wouldn't the larger injectors have a smaller number as they release more fuel?

So is there any advantages to changing my req fuel for the bigger injectors and starting over tuning my VE tables?

Thanks and sorry if my question is a bit confusing.
Old May 25, 2010 | 07:02 AM
  #2  
richyvrlimited's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
From: Warrington/Birmingham
Default

You have the req_fuel number backwards, oem injectors are around 13, my 600cc injecors are around 5...
Old May 25, 2010 | 10:40 AM
  #3  
therieldeal's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 547
Total Cats: 2
From: Northeastern CT
Default

yeah the bigger the injectors, the smaller the req fuel

the req fuel setting doesnt "really" matter, the idea is to allow scaleability of your maps if you change injector size. on the ms2 extra code the cranking settings are even scaled to the req fuel (they used to be straight up pw settings)
Old May 25, 2010 | 12:27 PM
  #4  
D.dutton9512's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 166
Total Cats: 0
From: Atlanta GA
Default

Well I went ahead and set req_fuel at the proper number and did some street tuning this morning. I havent noticed any real difference other than not feeling like I've forgotten something.
Old May 25, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #5  
kday's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 223
Total Cats: 0
From: Boston
Default

I am pretty sure it's just a scaling factor. If it was 10 and you set it to 1, you could multiply all of your VE values by 10 and get the same tune.
Old May 25, 2010 | 01:28 PM
  #6  
Jeff_Ciesielski's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,770
Total Cats: 31
From: Rhode Island
Default

Originally Posted by kday
I am pretty sure it's just a scaling factor. If it was 10 and you set it to 1, you could multiply all of your VE values by 10 and get the same tune.
Correct, but IIRC there is a limit. For some reason I have the number 255 sticking in my head.
Old May 25, 2010 | 01:30 PM
  #7  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by D.dutton9512
So is there any advantages to changing my req fuel for the bigger injectors and starting over tuning my VE tables?
No.

Req_Fuel is just a multiplier. You can just as easily go from one injector size to another by leaving it alone and re-scaling the whole VE table, which is essentially what you did.

The only real constraint is that the VE table has a maximum per-cell value (255) so if you find that you're approaching that value, you'll need to scale up Req_Fuel. Conversely, you don't want Req_Fuel to be so large that all of your VE values are very small- this sacrifices resolution.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
90 Turbo
MEGAsquirt
19
Oct 19, 2015 03:23 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
Trent
WTB
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:15 PM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
Oct 1, 2015 09:30 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.