Notices
Miata parts for sale/trade Buy, trade or sell your Miata parts here.

Billet Water Pump Inlet Adapter - Pre-Order

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2016 | 07:12 PM
  #21  
bahurd's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,408
Total Cats: 316
Default

Originally Posted by TheBandit
Give me a bit to research the thread geometry for these and I will see what I can do. Based on the responses here I think I will be pursuing this route over the NPT as initially conceptualized.
No problem.

SAE J514, Straight Thread O-Ring Boss (ORB)

Hose fittings seem to be available in either -12AN or -16AN for our hose sizes.

https://www.meziere.com/Products/Coo...B-to-Hose.aspx
Old Dec 29, 2016 | 10:44 PM
  #22  
gpzmax's Avatar
Newb
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20
Total Cats: 0
Default Want

I need one for my engine build
Old Jan 1, 2017 | 06:02 AM
  #23  
zossy1's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 171
Total Cats: 22
From: Australia
Default

Count me in either way, but id also prefer AN thread.
Old Jan 3, 2017 | 11:00 AM
  #24  
TheBandit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

Thanks for the response as always. I'm going to try to fit the larger ORB AN thread if I can make it fit. I'll check with our machinist and see if he sees any issues, but hopefully pricing and all can stay the same as before.
Old Jan 3, 2017 | 12:16 PM
  #25  
skou's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 278
Total Cats: 21
From: Meridian, ID
Default

Originally Posted by TheBandit
Thanks for the response as always. I'm going to try to fit the larger ORB AN thread if I can make it fit. I'll check with our machinist and see if he sees any issues, but hopefully pricing and all can stay the same as before.
FYI, the current SAE specification for straight thread o-ring ports is SAE J1926-1. Detailed machining dimensions are available here:

http://www.goodyearrubberproducts.co...n1.page477.pdf

When you talk to your machinist, suggest using the tap drill size instead of the basic minor diameter of the thread form to machine the crest flats. That will make the ORB fitting easier to engage into the threads.
Old Jan 6, 2017 | 08:27 AM
  #26  
TheBandit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

Test fittings on order. More updates soon.
Old Jan 9, 2017 | 08:34 AM
  #27  
pooch20's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 6
Total Cats: 0
Default

Hmmmmmm I'm interested. Would it be best to run the rear port to the turbo and then tee the heater hose into the rad hose?
Old Jan 9, 2017 | 08:44 AM
  #28  
TheBandit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default


This is how I'm routing things.
Old Jan 9, 2017 | 11:20 AM
  #29  
Philly Miata's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 349
Total Cats: 15
From: Philadelphia
Default

I'm a scrub but in your pictures is that the turbo that seems really low on the engine? I'm trying to figure out what I'm looking at, and what necessitates an adapter like this?
Old Jan 9, 2017 | 11:28 AM
  #30  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Philly Miata
I'm a scrub but in your pictures is that the turbo that seems really low on the engine? I'm trying to figure out what I'm looking at, and what necessitates an adapter like this?
Low mount EFR turbo seen in 2nd photo. Adapter needed for more room for low mount EFR turbo.

Old Jan 9, 2017 | 11:34 AM
  #31  
TheBandit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

Yep. See above picture.

That's actually my engine with the prototype attached. It gives more room for charge piping/compressor housings/intake tubing/etc.
Old Jan 12, 2017 | 01:33 PM
  #32  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Subb'd for glory. I'd also much rather see ORB & barb than NPT & barb, but then I have an intense hatred for everything NPT.

With that coolant routing above, are you getting enough flow through the heater core to make the heater or the defroster useful? IIRC the coolant fittings on the EFR are like M14, and that bore size is pretty much straight through to -6AN, or pretty close to it. Heater hoses are comparatively ginormous, pretty sure they are up in the -8AN or -10AN size range (I'm just using -AN sizes for comparison.)
Old Jan 12, 2017 | 03:10 PM
  #33  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
Subb'd for glory. I'd also much rather see ORB & barb than NPT & barb, but then I have an intense hatred for everything NPT.

With that coolant routing above, are you getting enough flow through the heater core to make the heater or the defroster useful? IIRC the coolant fittings on the EFR are like M14, and that bore size is pretty much straight through to -6AN, or pretty close to it. Heater hoses are comparatively ginormous, pretty sure they are up in the -8AN or -10AN size range (I'm just using -AN sizes for comparison.)

As I visualize it, the coolant will be sitting in the heater core longer if the turbo was a restriction, which isn't that big a deal for defrost or general heater use. That allows more heat energy to be transferred via forced convection through the heat exchanger and possibly even providing a slightly cooler fluid to the turbo.

heater core lines would be -10AN
Old Jan 12, 2017 | 03:59 PM
  #34  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Many years ago, before my first turbo kit (before this forum), I had cooling issues. My first fix was to place a ~.250 restricter in the heater core line. Eventually I changed the radiator, but the restricter remained until I redid all the hoses with the V6. This car was my daily for many years and heater/defroster function was not affected.
Old Jan 12, 2017 | 04:45 PM
  #35  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Was your car overheating?
Old Jan 12, 2017 | 06:55 PM
  #36  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

My issue at the time was overheating, yes.
Old Jan 12, 2017 | 07:29 PM
  #37  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
My issue at the time was overheating, yes.
Curious if routing the return to the radiator inlet would have allowed more heat to be shed at the expense of a slightly longer warm up time. If the radiator wasn't a limitation that is.
Old Jan 13, 2017 | 10:09 AM
  #38  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Corky?
Old Jan 13, 2017 | 11:59 AM
  #39  
TheBandit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

Fittings have arrived - prototype with ORB to follow. I'll keep everyone updated.

Continue the cooling discussion - More info is a good thing.
Old Jan 13, 2017 | 12:20 PM
  #40  
bahurd's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,408
Total Cats: 316
Default

Originally Posted by TheBandit
Fittings have arrived - prototype with ORB to follow. I'll keep everyone updated.

Continue the cooling discussion - More info is a good thing.
What size fittings are you going for?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 PM.