Notices
Prefabbed Turbo Kits A place to discuss prefabricated turbo kits on the market

Boosted Tuning Guidance/Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 10:41 AM
  #21  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Ok, here is the revised map. I remapped the rpm row; however, I didn't change the kpa column.

Any more advice would be much appreciated!


​​​​​​​
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 10:48 AM
  #22  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

That’ll do for now, try a 3rd gear log and plug it into VD.
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 10:59 AM
  #23  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Sounds good, I'll do a few pulls and report back.
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 06:19 PM
  #24  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Ok, I did a few pulls after getting the fueling in check. Here was roughly the most accurate one I believe.



Roughly how much more psi can I realistically push? What would be a safe WHP range? I've heard roughly around 220 is the way to go, especially since it gives leniency when the temperature gets colder. (I'm in Texas) How would I go about making sure that it'll be safe in the winter and in the summer?
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 07:07 PM
  #25  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Attach the tune and the logs
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 07:27 PM
  #26  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Here is the log and the tune.

My boost duty is at around 28% right now, because I was upping the boost. It gave me about 8.5psi. Weird because with 10 degree for all values above 100kpa at 28% duty, I ran 10.5 psi, so I'm not sure why it changed.
Attached Files
File Type: msq
CurrentTune.msq (285.0 KB, 2 views)
File Type: msl
2025-09-12_14.51.01.msl (86.3 KB, 1 views)
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 07:52 PM
  #27  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

As you increase efficiency of your motor, you’ll see boost pressure go down. That’s a good thing. Go back to 10*, and you’ll probably see 10.5psi again.
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 07:54 PM
  #28  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Gotcha, other than that how are things looking in your opinion? And just out of pure curiosity why is that the case?
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 10:28 PM
  #29  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

What is this, boost for ants? Boost duty in the log was 0%. Increase to 36% and take another log. Fueling looked awesome, rest of the tune looks good too, only stuff I'd change relates to drivability.

You're also really close to your overboost protection. It's set at 177, but a hysteresis of 15, so it'll kick in as low as 152, or 7.5psi, and you're already at 141, so turn that up to 200kpa before turning boost duty up. I've done 4-5 dyno pulls making 300hp on a bone stock '99, if you briefly touch over 220hp in your ventures, it won't immediately blow up, promise.

We were doing 6-8psi turbo setups for YEARS on piggybacks, EV1 injectors, and rising rate fuel pressure regulators back in....2005?

Please note, I typically boost nice Miatas. So if yours is a 280k un-maintained shitbox on the stock clutch, stock suspension/brakes, and original timing belt, maybe don't turn it up. But everything I'm seeing in the log looks good, and good condition stock miatas can handle everything I'm suggesting.
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 10:44 PM
  #30  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Hahaha yeah, that was a log from just wastegate pressure. PSI duty is now at 28% so boost is at 8.5 with virtual dyno saying I’m making 200hp. I’m planning to go to roughly 10psi and that should shoot me in the 220-230who range.

Don’t worry the car is in pretty good condition. 78k miles, maintenance is well kept up just trying to be precautious. I’ll post the tune, log, and VD results for the 200hp one.

I’ll do another pull tonight at 10psi and report back
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 10:55 PM
  #31  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

8.5psi, 28% duty


Attached Files
File Type: msl
2025-09-12_21.26.36.msl (90.0 KB, 2 views)
File Type: msq
CurrentTune.msq (284.7 KB, 1 views)
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 10:59 PM
  #32  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by curly
only stuff I'd change relates to drivability.
What would you change about drivability?
Old Sep 12, 2025 | 11:44 PM
  #33  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Oh some idle timing, idle VE looks a bit far from idle region of main fuel table, and idle RPM is lower than I run it. It's usually smoother around 950 vs. 800.
Old Sep 13, 2025 | 12:07 AM
  #34  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Oh really? I’ll give it a try running it around 900-950. Are you saying that my fueling on my VE map is different from my idle VE table, or what is it? What timing do you usually run for idling?
Old Sep 13, 2025 | 03:04 AM
  #35  
Salva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Here is where I'm sitting at, roughly 220 whp at about 10 psi. I've attached the log, tune, and photo of the VD results.




I think this is a good level of boost and power to leave it at, so in the colder months when the turbo is making more power, I have some leeway in order to not have to worry about knock or excessive amounts of hp. For now, I am just going to focus on getting the boost duty table locked in, maybe switching to closed loop boost control, fine-tuning my VE table, and working on drivability (ie, higher idle, better hot and cold start-ups)

Thoughts?

Side note: The car is fast for sure, but maybe if I can muster up the money, I'll do a forged build in the upcoming years... I mean, this isn't supposed to be boost for ants...


Attached Files
File Type: msq
CurrentTune.msq (284.7 KB, 3 views)
File Type: mlg
2025-09-13_01.06.56.mlg (5.06 MB, 2 views)
Old Sep 13, 2025 | 10:57 PM
  #36  
m1yeh's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 44
Total Cats: 0
Default

@curly Thank you for providing so much feedback in this thread. Helped me double check and feel better about my tune.
@Salva I went through the same experience as you and your map is getting closer and closer to mine with each iteration. FYI yours is still more conservative and I'm on stock 10:1 compression with 91 octane, so don't be afraid to go even further.

Last edited by m1yeh; Sep 15, 2025 at 04:59 AM.
Old Sep 14, 2025 | 01:46 PM
  #37  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

You're welcome. One day I'll spend a bunch of time on the dyno focusing on nothing but ignition timing and see if I can verify/perfect my suggestions, but it's been a great starting place for me over the years.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
borka
Cars for sale/trade
6
Mar 14, 2025 10:08 PM
CZSteve
Engine Performance
2
Aug 31, 2024 07:22 AM
nachomiata
MEGAsquirt
2
Feb 12, 2022 12:09 PM
InitialM
Build Threads
6
Feb 19, 2019 03:09 PM
spencer9474
Cars for sale/trade
4
May 14, 2018 08:49 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM.