Notices
Prefabbed Turbo Kits A place to discuss prefabricated turbo kits on the market

Elusive fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 11:56 AM
  #41  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
You know, I was impressed by that.
I was also impressed that it was backed up on a different dyno.
I think the stock fuel system on our cars is underrated, perhaps the fuel pump is able to keep up even with the injectors never closing?
apparently. i dunno, i still wouldn't use stock injectors on that system if i was running 10psi. at 6psi, as shipped, sure. But that thing is too efficent of a setup apparently.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 11:57 AM
  #42  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
No ****, 1L/ minute!?

Corkys post is a little cryptic, but in general, yeah, he's right.

My math says that at 12.5:1 Afr, on a 60psi non referenced system 240 crank is possible at 10psi.

Go to bed Vlad youre drunk.
So you agree with corky, that tapering torque increases the fuel system overhead and nets you more power?



k
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 12:04 PM
  #43  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

here's how to test that: increase timing until boom! note the AFRs.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 12:08 PM
  #44  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I mean if he's gonna claim that the stock fuel system can go beyond the injector duty cycle limits because the pump is strong, and that you can keep going with injectors never closing until you run out of fuel pressure, I think I would have to agree with that. At least based on what they've provem already with the AO kit.

Most of us would agree that is very dangerous, but appears possible.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 12:13 PM
  #45  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
So you agree with corky, that tapering torque increases the fuel system overhead and nets you more power?



k
I agree that torque=pulse width.

You still don't understand thats pulsewidth at a given duty cycle changes with rpm.
That baffles me.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 12:24 PM
  #46  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
I agree that torque=pulse width.

You still don't understand thats pulsewidth at a given duty cycle changes with rpm.
That baffles me.
pulsewidth at given rpm changes the duty cycle

potato pohtahtoe

can you unwad your panties so we can move on and discuss the actual interesting topic of this thread is drifting to, which is the oem miata fuel system "real" limit?
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 12:34 PM
  #47  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

Calculate it.

I did.

240 crank, at 12.5:1afr, 10psi, 60psi flat pressure in the rail.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 12:37 PM
  #48  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
Calculate it.

I did.

240 crank, at 12.5:1afr, 10psi, 60psi flat pressure in the rail.
omg, are you on 28kb connection or something? did you not see the last few posts? We know its possible, because it was already done. And backed up.

and it's not 60psi flat on an nb returnless system. but that doesn't matter, because BEGi already proved that its still possible, even with a tapering rail pressure.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 01:17 PM
  #49  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

ill give you some tapering rail pressure.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 01:28 PM
  #50  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Attached Images
File Type: gif
Zach+Randolph+Stretch.gif (4.55 MB, 264 views)
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 01:30 PM
  #51  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

omfg, this thread is painful to read.

Someone with a Dynojet plot of their car and a datalog of a WOT pull please post the following four traces on the same plot:

1. horsepower (SAE corrected)
2. torque (SAE corrected)
3. ECU-commanded pulsewidth
4. ECU-calculated injector duty cycle
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 01:45 PM
  #52  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

BTW, before that chart is posted, here's what I think it will show:

-injector pulsewidth correlates to torque, but not as closely as Corky thinks
-injector duty cycle correlates to power, but not as closely as anyone thinks
-both of these are true because BSFC (fuel mass required to make X horsepower for X hours) goes up as engine speed increases

Here's a cool chart to show why this is true:

3OugEDm.png

[/thread]
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 06:54 PM
  #53  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

Yep. Along with the fuel system variables etc
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 08:50 PM
  #54  
williams805's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 520
Total Cats: 27
From: Goleta, Southern California
Default

I am very curious to see pulse width at peak torque and there after.

Also Sav, forgive my stupidity but I've never seen a graph like that. Can you explain what I'm looking at here? Are the camel back lines the torque curves at different load percentages? And what is the pink line? Also not sure why looks like horspower lines are going down while rpms are going up.
Or just point me at some reading materials so I can read up on this.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 09:08 PM
  #55  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I didn't have a PW log of the above tune (different car).

Here's one I dug up from years ago of my gt3076 miata on e85




You were saying?
Attached Images
File Type: png
idcvspw.png (49.1 KB, 150 views)
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 09:22 PM
  #56  
williams805's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 520
Total Cats: 27
From: Goleta, Southern California
Default

Is it safe to say that peak torque is at 4600ish? Looks like pw is still going up until MAF begins to fall. So if 100% dc is hit at peak torque that would be bad news. AFR would have to fall at that point.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 09:46 PM
  #57  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

here's an even better one with MAP falling toward redline

pw still goes up



if someone has better examples post up.
Attached Images
File Type: png
idcvspw2.png (60.8 KB, 140 views)
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 10:37 PM
  #58  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

last one cause now I'm getting bored


pw maximum at peak is 15.1, and minimum at the end is 14.4
Attached Images
File Type: png
idcvspw3.png (69.3 KB, 128 views)
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 12:54 AM
  #59  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
Yep. Along with the fuel system variables etc
Lots of little things contribute to the consistent rise in PW/IDC that everyone sees in reality. Things like the lack of mixture homogeneity that comes as the injectors are forced to open while the intake valve is open (ideally the entire fuel pulse would be delivered to a closed valve). Increasing BSFC is a big contributor, though - if BSFC goes up by 10%, fuel requirements go up by the exact same amount for the same power/torque being produced.
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 01:03 AM
  #60  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by williams805
Also Sav, forgive my stupidity but I've never seen a graph like that. Can you explain what I'm looking at here? Are the camel back lines the torque curves at different load percentages? And what is the pink line? Also not sure why looks like horspower lines are going down while rpms are going up.
Or just point me at some reading materials so I can read up on this.
"Camel lines" are torque curves, yep. The colored areas are BSFC. Google "brake specific fuel consumption"

Horsepower lines are going down because torque goes down as you move down the Y axis. If you multiply RPM and torque anywhere on that chart, you get a horsepower number, and those are shown graphically on the chart by curving lines.

I'm not 100% certain on the pink line, but I believe it is a peak efficiency line from idle to redline.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.