NA vs FI , before and after, low end talk.
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: high performance all year round california
Posts: 82
Total Cats: 0
I love turbo power and all... But I do miss the "not worrying bout crap" feeling I had when its N/A'ed.....I mean the turbo is reliable and all...its just the car seems to break more when its boosted....
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: high performance all year round california
Posts: 82
Total Cats: 0
yeah there definatly is a difference on how you modulate the throttle. if your not careful it can kick out a bit faster.. butthis is ture with any car that has decent to good power. takes me a while to get use to it......but theres nothing like going WOT in 5th gear and it pull like an NA does in 3rd or 2nd.........
#28
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central California
Posts: 2,533
Total Cats: 0
I have a 90 turbo, rebuilt engine and a 97 stock w/ 112k on the clock and the 90 feels more powerful across the spectrum, no question it has more low end grunt. Rebuilt engine or older 1.8 or both the cause idk.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
04-21-2016 03:00 PM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
09-30-2015 02:44 PM