Notices
Prefabbed Turbo Kits A place to discuss prefabricated turbo kits on the market

psi on stock 1.6?

Old Feb 12, 2007 | 11:57 PM
  #1  
ckandes1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 97
Total Cats: 0
From: Ormond Beach, FL
Default psi on stock 1.6?

how much boost can a stock 1.6 handle? I've heard of 13psi being the limit, safely. is this about accurate?
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #2  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Could be perfectly fine given a good tune, or perfectly deadly.

I think the 250rwhp range is where people stop pushing it....don't look at it in PSI levels.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:10 AM
  #3  
ckandes1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 97
Total Cats: 0
From: Ormond Beach, FL
Default

so i'f im staying around or under 200whp i dont have to be too worried as long as i dont have poor tuning?
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 02:35 AM
  #4  
krayzrac3r's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 407
Total Cats: 0
From: So Cal
Default

the key to any engine is tuning... back when i had a z and would hang around on the 350z forums there were people blowing their motors with stock greddy twin turbo kits 5.5 psi. Then there were people with 450whp and a AWESOME tune that were daily driving it and raping the **** out of the car with no problems (except for the dreaded POS Viscous LSD's they come with)
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #5  
KMag's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 144
Total Cats: 3
From: Louisville, Ky
Default

Is this going to be a street car or track car? 12-13 psi for the street is plenty of fun and will suffice for most all accelleration issues that you will need. Rule of thumb is also that if tuned properly, it will give you near the same lifespan of an N/A engine.

KMag
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:06 PM
  #6  
Arkmage's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,895
Total Cats: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by KMag
Rule of thumb is also that if tuned properly, it will give you near the same lifespan of an N/A engine. KMag
That thumb must get hit with a lot of hammers... I don't believe that in the least. More power means more force and every component will fatigue at a faster rate. The lifespan will be reduced, just not to a degree that makes it worth driving NA forever.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:13 PM
  #7  
boostinsteve's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
Default

I believe that Corky said that on average, the life span is reduced 25% for a boosted car, can't remember where I saw that, but I read it somewhere.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:42 PM
  #8  
ckandes1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 97
Total Cats: 0
From: Ormond Beach, FL
Default

The life span is definitely decreased, but IMO who cares. Who wants to live long if life is shitty?

I'm going to be using whatever miata I purchase mostly for DD use, but also monthly autocrosses.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 03:14 PM
  #9  
akaryrye's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,557
Total Cats: 5
From: Central California
Default

engines are a dime a dozen for 80 - 120k miles. blow one up and throw another in.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 06:07 PM
  #10  
adbradley's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 999
Total Cats: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by akaryrye
engines are a dime a dozen for 80 - 120k miles. blow one up and throw another in.
1.8 being rebuilt in my garage waiting for the 1.6 to let go
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #11  
TheBandit's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

I think Andy had his 1.6L at or over 300whp for several years. Not many go over the 250 mark without new internals. I think around 300 is probably about as much as i'd want to run without new stuff internally.
-Michael-
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 08:23 PM
  #12  
brgracer's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,275
Total Cats: 1
From: Ambler, PA
Default

Don't forget, that it's not just the engine that you have to consider. North of 200hp is where you have to start worrying about the tranny, diff, overheating, bigger brakes, etc...

Granted there are a few who have taken the stock 1.6 to great heights such as Ric at RM, but then again he blew that engine shooting for over 400hp as he was testing the limits of a junkyard motor, but I don't think many of us are in the same boat as him.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #13  
krayzrac3r's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 407
Total Cats: 0
From: So Cal
Default

brgracer.... what you have right now is what im shooting for. That is WAY MORE than enough. 250whp on a car that weighs 2200 lbs is ridiculously fast. My Z had 255whp with a couple bolt ons and that thing weighed 3200 lbs. Boy was it fast now I can only imagine that power with 1000lbs less weight.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 10:43 PM
  #14  
disturbedfan121's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,552
Total Cats: -2
From: Freehold, NJ
Default

im shooting for 215 anything in particular i should change other than the stock 1.6 diff?
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 11:19 PM
  #15  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

brakes. radiator. suspension.
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #16  
4sfed5's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 206
Total Cats: 10
Default

HAVING BEEN in a 270RWHP 1990 MIATA that was very easily doing 5.2 second 0-60 times ON THE STREET i can vouch that 250+RWHP is a FAST FAST CAR. I have to make do with my 200rwhp.
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 05:14 AM
  #17  
juhanis's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 106
Total Cats: 0
From: Campbell, California
Default

i dont know how much power i'm making, i'm hanging with a stock c5 vette at 11psi. and i run 15psi on 100octane with my 16g turbo. hopefully i can get some numbers soon. my motor is a stock 170k mile 1.6, no problems so far.
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #18  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

yeah i wanna see how that 16g holds up the manifolds arent horrible for the money, you are running an IC though so you might be abit different than mine at 11-15psi. what are you running for ECU agian?
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 04:57 PM
  #19  
k1n0y's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

thats pretty fast
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
Trent
WTB
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:15 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.