Notices
Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 949 Racing

Tire Pr0n

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 09:30 AM
  #1  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default Tire Pr0n

New track shoes for the Miata. I cannot wait to try them out at Texas World Speedway in a couple of months racing against some fast TTS competition.

Cue the **** music...


They will be going on 15x9 6ULs.
Attached Thumbnails Tire Pr0n-hoooooosierage.jpg  
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 10:10 AM
  #2  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Old Nov 10, 2011 | 10:18 AM
  #3  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,155
Total Cats: 3,536
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Will this work?

Old Nov 10, 2011 | 10:28 AM
  #4  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Racing cars are all about turning money into noise and heat.

Lol at that **** music.awesome
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #5  
k24madness's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
From: San Rafael, CA
Default

They worked awesome on my car. Make sure to start with at least 3 degrees in the front and 2.5 in the rear of camber. I found tire pressures of 26-28 hot to be ideal. Rotate midway through the day for best life. Don't head out with pressures to low or you will cord the outsides. It's best to start around 25 and bleed down midway through the session.

Enjoy!
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 04:28 PM
  #6  
Seefo's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,961
Total Cats: 48
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

just get heat blankets then!
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 06:51 PM
  #7  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by k24madness
They worked awesome on my car. Make sure to start with at least 3 degrees in the front and 2.5 in the rear of camber. I found tire pressures of 26-28 hot to be ideal. Rotate midway through the day for best life. Don't head out with pressures to low or you will cord the outsides. It's best to start around 25 and bleed down midway through the session.

Enjoy!
I am camber challenged right now in the front. It is maxed out at about 2 degs. It might be time for some offset bushings or a V8R lower control arm.

Funny thing is, when I was using the Formula Atlantic Hoosier slicks last month, which are essentially the same size, and radials, the tire temperatures (probe type) were showing that the camber was OK. They were slightly warmer on the inside edge. However my hot pressures were a lot higher than 28 psi since I was desperately trying to get heat in them by adding more pressure. It was a cool, cloudy day and the track was cold.

I should call Hoosier. I want this to be right so I do not cord the edges.
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #8  
k24madness's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
From: San Rafael, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
I am camber challenged right now in the front. It is maxed out at about 2 degs. It might be time for some offset bushings or a V8R lower control arm.

Funny thing is, when I was using the Formula Atlantic Hoosier slicks last month, which are essentially the same size, and radials, the tire temperatures (probe type) were showing that the camber was OK. They were slightly warmer on the inside edge. However my hot pressures were a lot higher than 28 psi since I was desperately trying to get heat in them by adding more pressure. It was a cool, cloudy day and the track was cold.

I should call Hoosier. I want this to be right so I do not cord the edges.
I killed mine on the first day after 6-7 sessions. The right front corded. I was running 2.5 degrees of camber F and 2 rear. Before I invest in another set I am going to swap in a NB subframe and modify the lower control arms for more camber.

I suggest you wait till you can get more camber in the car before trying them otherwise it will be a short love affair.
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 07:55 PM
  #9  
kotomile's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
From: Monterey, CA
Default

Attached Thumbnails Tire Pr0n-401742530-obama-cash.gif  
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 10:26 AM
  #10  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

IMO- I'd address that camber issue before hitting the track. I ran at least -3.25 on the front with hoosier dot radials, more depending on the track.
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 08:45 PM
  #11  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Thanks guys. Your feedback is consistent with what I have heard and read. More camber is on the way.

It's only money... It's only money... It's only money...
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 08:51 PM
  #12  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
I am camber challenged right now in the front. It is maxed out at about 2 degs.
Something is bent. Start with the lower balljoint and go from there. I have no problem at all getting 3 degrees in either of my cars at 4" front ride height.
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 09:52 PM
  #13  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

I have a non-stock K-member with the V8 swap. But I also had problems getting more than about -2.2 degs camber on my stock k-member 99 (lowered) as well. There was nothing bent on that car. This seems to be a common limit no?
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 12:28 AM
  #14  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Definitely not a common limit, no. My black car is capable of ~3.4*, the red car is capable of at least that much. Both cars are set at 4/4.2 ride height, front camber on both is at 3.0*. Adjusters are not maxed out.

I am going to start at 3.4/3.0 on the R80s and see what that gets me.
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 08:49 AM
  #15  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

I agree- especially not if the car is lowered. I've had the same problem and even if it all looks straight, it's not. I've read of several SMs that have regained a full degree of negative camber just by replacing the lower arm and ball joint, stating that everything looks straight.
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 11:37 AM
  #16  
k24madness's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
From: San Rafael, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Savington

I am going to start at 3.4/3.0 on the R80s and see what that gets me.
I don't think you are going to need that much camber. When running the R80's at 2.5F & 2.0R the rear wear looked pretty good but the fronts needed more camber for sure. Next time out I am going to try 3F & 2.25R and measure tire temps.
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 02:11 PM
  #17  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
I have a non-stock K-member with the V8 swap. But I also had problems getting more than about -2.2 degs camber on my stock k-member 99 (lowered) as well. There was nothing bent on that car. This seems to be a common limit no?
I only seem to be able to get -2 on NB subframes (about 4.5" pinch).
What subframe is your non-stock one based on (dimension-wise)?
Shortening the uppers also make the coilover center in the "hole"
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 02:23 PM
  #18  
crashnscar's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Making the uppers shorter will also bring the top of the tire into the frame more, which doesn't have much room to spare anyways.
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 03:49 PM
  #19  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
Making the uppers shorter will also bring the top of the tire into the frame more, which doesn't have much room to spare anyways.
Measure twice, cut once
Moving the lower ball joint is another option (lower OEM parts cost too).

1 degree change is about 10mm difference top-bottom of tire.
Moving the upper ball-joint (to get that extra degree camber) will move the top 6.8mm
Moving the bottom result in 3mm move.

So a net difference of 3.8mm more inwards by modding the upper, but a 15x10 is probably tight however you look at it.

The difference might be different (larger or smaller) when looking at frame contact at full (if used?) lock.
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 04:02 PM
  #20  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by NiklasFalk
I only seem to be able to get -2 on NB subframes (about 4.5" pinch).
Drop the car half an inch and watch the magic happen.

Full lock clearance with a 15x10 is a pipe dream. I would expect it to rub half a dozen things at full lock - the front bumper, the FSB, the UCA, your mom's ****, etc. We're looking for shock tower and fender clearance - the shock tower is very tight with the 10s. If I can compress to the bump stop and sweep the steering wheel 270* in either direction, then in my book it fits.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.