Notices
Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 10:59 AM
  #1  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment

Cliffs:

As compared to gasoline-powered cars, vehicles fueled by ethenol increase environmental health impacts by 80%, and EVs charged off the grid increase environmental health impacts by 200% (they kill a lot more people.)

The full paper: Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States

Paper is written by reputable environmental scientists in academic with no financial stake in transportation fuel, and published by the National Academy of Sciences.
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 11:08 AM
  #2  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

and that's all wiped out when 1 volcano erupts, right?
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 11:20 AM
  #3  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Unless you have figured out a way to build a volcano-powered car, no.
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 12:47 PM
  #4  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Interesting article, thanks for sharing it, Joe.

Something interesting I noticed is the lack of discussion of EV nuclear powered vehicles. 20% of our power generation in the US is by nuclear fuel (40% by coal). It would be pretty easy to use this study as part of a baseline to further push the power generation by nuclear fuel agenda.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 01:13 PM
  #5  
rleete's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,793
Total Cats: 1,341
From: Rochester, NY
Default

I've been thinking about this a lot lately. Someone posted an article, which led me to doing some research, which lead to other articles...you get the idea.

So. Thorium reactors. Why haven't we got them all over by now? Yes, I know, politics and stupid people. But bear with me a sec.

Assume some rich guy likes them. Not your average won the lottery type guy, but someone with huge financial reserves. Gates, Buffet, Koch bros, etc. They have the finances to push past the BS, to actually get something built. Maybe start by replacing an existing plant. It seems to me that some of the more visionary types (Elon Musk?) would jump all over this. Once one is in place, I think it's safe to say we'd see dozens within a few years, and hundreds within a decade.

Other than the typical ignorance surrounding nukes, what is stopping this from happening? Or is ignorance really so prevalent in this country among those that make the decisions?
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 01:37 PM
  #6  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

In Fallout lore, fossil fuel reserves dried up and everything went nuclear powered, including cars.



This idea apparently came from an idea Ford had for a nuclear powered concept car

Attached Thumbnails Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment-chryslusad2.png   Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment-nuclear-powered-car-1.jpg  
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 02:08 PM
  #7  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

Nuclear powered cars are no concept.
In 1985, a scientist by the name of Dr. Emmett Brown built a plutonium powered Delorean.
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 02:25 PM
  #8  
williams805's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 520
Total Cats: 27
From: Goleta, Southern California
Default

^was also powered by bananas and beer cans in a pinch.

So how about model s charged completely by solar? Still bad new for the planet?
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 02:49 PM
  #9  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

^**** yeah it's still bad. Solar panels create microwave radiation, and cause the deformation of water molecules. Which is why most hybrid owners are victims of hate crimes.
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 04:53 PM
  #10  
TalkingPie's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 277
Total Cats: 58
From: Montreal, QC
Default

Originally Posted by thirdgen
Nuclear powered cars are no concept.
In 1985, a scientist by the name of Dr. Emmett Brown built a plutonium powered Delorean.
The internal combustion engine runs on ordinary gasoline; it always has.
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 05:23 PM
  #11  
chriscar's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,709
Total Cats: 16
From: Carrollton TX
Default

Originally Posted by williams805
So how about model s charged completely by solar?
Have you seen a solar panel factory?



C
Attached Thumbnails Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment-i-a59856c15fe00d238cca3194c9d8c93a-ir_pollution.jpg  
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 05:57 PM
  #12  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by TalkingPie
The internal combustion engine runs on ordinary gasoline; it always has.
Not sure if serious...
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 06:34 PM
  #13  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by rleete
I've been thinking about this a lot lately. Someone posted an article, which led me to doing some research, which lead to other articles...you get the idea.

So. Thorium reactors. Why haven't we got them all over by now? Yes, I know, politics and stupid people.
Without spending a second on Wikipedia wasn't India supposed to work on sub-critical Thorium reactors, mostly due to their abundance of Thorium and no accessible Uranium?
I have not heard much in mainstream news for several years.

Vehicles driven by direct electricity (overhead wires or inductive) and having a spare engine to use on non-powered roads might have some merit, all other electrical solutions seems to be doomed on a large scale (e.g. 30+% of all transports).
There are special cases where I would not mind an electric one (commuting and free charging at work), but that is based on European level of taxes on dino fuel and no extra (transportation related) taxes on electricity (yet). Give it some volume and those taxes need to be sourced somehow.
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 08:00 PM
  #14  
TalkingPie's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 277
Total Cats: 58
From: Montreal, QC
Default

Originally Posted by thirdgen
Not sure if serious...
It's a direct quote from Dr. Emmett Brown. Although the time machine's time circuits were powered by 1.21 Jiggywatts (Hollywood says it's an SI unit of power, wanna fight about it?) of electricity, the car always moved under the gasoline engine's power (except when it flew due to the hover conversion it underwent in 2015 or when a steam locomotive pushed it in 1885).

It's science.
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 08:04 PM
  #15  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

Touché.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 08:34 AM
  #16  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

Pretty sure gigga watts is an SI unit.
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 08:51 AM
  #17  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
Pretty sure gigga watts is an SI unit.
Like a Honda Civic Si?
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 08:57 AM
  #18  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
Pretty sure gigga watts is an SI unit.
Watt is an SI unit (Kg* m² / s³), Giga is a unit prefix (10⁹).
"jiggy" is a Hollywood unit prefix.

A Googolwatt might be larger than a Jiggywatt, but who cares
What's a Jizzywhat?
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 09:26 AM
  #19  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

I'm sure he said a word which he pronounced, ' jiggah what'.

Jiggah what = giggawatt?
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 09:28 AM
  #20  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

For example, the format '.gif' is pronounced jiff



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 AM.