Supercharger Discussion For all you misguided souls.

so those of you with a supercharged miata...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2008, 06:32 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
Default so those of you with a supercharged miata...

would you do it again or would you go turbo?

yeah yeah can get a bit more out of a turbo, but for those just wanting a fun daily is the extra 20 horsepower really worth it?
ChairFaceChippendale is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 07:04 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Scuba_Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 0
Default

I have both and still prefer the turbo. Properly sized, turbo lag is not an issue and I like the power delivery. Moreover, I believe the turbo is a simpler and more reliable form of FI.
Scuba_Steve is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 07:19 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
Default

i actually kind of enjoy a bit of lag. i like the rubber band acceleration feeling associated with something that doesn't make boost until a bit higher in the rev range. yeah, i know that should probably put me in the turbo camp, but i've had 3 turbo cars so maybe i just want something a little different with the ability to keep my forced induction.

no doubt turbos are more efficient (that's just science, not opinion) as far as power production goes. reliability i think would have to come down to the build of either engine or setup i suppose.

i must say the crank problems on early cars do make me a little leery of a supercharger. overstated or not, it's a shitty problem to have to worry about.
ChairFaceChippendale is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:20 PM
  #4  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

20 hp! i daily drive my 250+ rwhp car. it's pretty solid. and lots of fun.
y8s is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:29 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
Default

but have you ever driven a supercharged car? i haven't...i'm just curios as to why someone would go that route.

at this point if i was given a miata right now along with enough cash to add my perfect forced induction system i'd put on a supercharger. partly because there are tons of turbo cars going around and i guess partly to be different. that and with a supercharger i can still add some of the fun n/a power modifiers.

and can you honestly say a 230 or 240 hp car would be less fun? i see both sides here, i'm just playing devils advocate.
ChairFaceChippendale is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:39 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
kotomile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
Default

Ignoring all other factors, that a turbo serves as a muffler is one reason I'm so fond of them. My Miata, with only the turbine and one straight-through muffler acting to diffuse sound waves, is quieter than a lot of n/a cars which are much slower. The same exhaust on a supercharger would be near deafening!
kotomile is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 12:00 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
Default

that is something i have considered. i love the sound of a borla on these cars, but i figure when the time comes i can always tinker with the exhaust if it's a bit too loud.
ChairFaceChippendale is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 08:45 AM
  #8  
Newb
 
jsinnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chesapeake VA
Posts: 31
Total Cats: 0
Default

My supercharged car is quieter than when it was N/A. I like the linear power delivery of the S/C.... makes it feel like a bigger engine across the board. My setup is 185 rwhp at about 6lbs of boost. No problems after 2 1/2 years and 15k miles.
jsinnard is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 12:51 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
steelrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 513
Total Cats: 0
Default

I don't think I would switch my SC... would I do the purchase differently, probably. If still hotside, would have bought TDR (no it wasn't available when I bought my kit). Definately something 6-rib....

Would have probably gone with an MS as well.... 4 years makes a big changes in support, etc....

Might go coldside, but I'm not sure.

Driven a few turbos, and some of them, depending on how they spool are great to drive..... Make all those cool bov noises too.....

But I'm happy with what I gots.......

Dave,
steelrat is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 07:22 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Jefe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: VT
Posts: 939
Total Cats: 0
Default

I have both, and like both, so I'm not much help....
Jefe is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:14 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
cardriverx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Jefe
I have both, and like both, so I'm not much help....
add a ls1 miata and your set!
cardriverx is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:30 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Jefe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: VT
Posts: 939
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cardriverx
add a ls1 miata and your set!
GF already wants to get another lift (this one a 4 poster) for more storage, It was HER idea, couldn't believe it... Oh wait it's my money- why wouldn't she want to spend it... Damn the women that don't work and and damn the men even more for taking them in...

LS1...mmm...
Jefe is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:39 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
BarbyCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 469
Total Cats: 25
Default

I took rides in turbo and supercharged cars and drove both. My favourite was a nicely sorted FMII in a NB. But I went supercharged because I don't like the looks of all that heat blanket and shields that seem to end up filling the space over the exhaust.
BarbyCar is offline  
Old 05-28-2008, 07:30 AM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
richyvrlimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Warrington/Birmingham
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
Default

I'd go turbo next time, but only because I've already had a charger, not because I don't like anything about it.
richyvrlimited is offline  
Old 05-28-2008, 05:28 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jefe
I have both, and like both, so I'm not much help....
which would you prefer as a daily then?
ChairFaceChippendale is offline  
Old 05-28-2008, 07:19 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Jefe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: VT
Posts: 939
Total Cats: 0
Default

I much prefer the turbo, I built my 'kit' four or five years ago, and it has never left me stranded... The turbo is pretty small but I get good mileage, there's plenty of power when I need to pass or play. It sounds cool, even with the Recirc BOV.

I originally bought the S/C one with plans to twincharge (I built a manifold, have a couple of extra turbo's kickin around and all the hardware) But my kids seem to take up more time than I have right now.

I will add I drive the S/C daily, and she drives the Turbo. I had some S/C issues w/ the original 4 rib belt setup, a few hours and some re-engineering fixed that. The S/C does 'go into boost' pretty early but the car doesn't really go any faster, Miata's don't make enough power down low til the cams wake up. The S/C has the MS, and I like playing with that.

Both of us think the turbo car is quicker, but it maybe just the 'rush' of torque the turbo hits you with over the gradual feeling of the S/C power delivery. One thing I have noticed, I frequent a two lane road where passing is only available in a few spots, the turbo car delivers it's power to the wheels much quicker than the S/C (and results in a lot quicker pass time)

Neither car has more than 200HP, Neither the S/C or Turbo are capable of it (even at 12psi)...
Jefe is offline  
Old 06-04-2008, 08:20 AM
  #17  
Newb
 
mhoward1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 39
Total Cats: 0
Default

I like the potential of the Turbo cars more, but I have found on track for the 150-190 HP range I like the S/C more. The linear deliver of the power makes throttle moderation easier exiting out of the corner.
mhoward1 is offline  
Old 06-04-2008, 09:13 AM
  #18  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
miatamania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Concord, North Carolina
Posts: 4,160
Total Cats: 6
Default

I'm going to turbo my miata because I've never been impressed w/ S/C miatas and I just enjoy turbos (never actually driven a turbo miata, ridden in a few...driven 3-4 S/C ones)

But I'm going to try and custom SC a 2.0 ABA hybrid motor in a GTI once I sell my 16v GTI as a daily...
miatamania is offline  
Old 06-04-2008, 10:40 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
Default

well if your going to do that you could just drop a g60 in the gti and call it a day.


i'm really curious to hear how opinions would change if more people had supercharged cars with a bit more power. something with maybe 10 or 15 horsepower less than a well-suited turbo car. i need to get my hands on a miata followed shortly by the money to supercharge it.
ChairFaceChippendale is offline  
Old 06-04-2008, 04:15 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Agent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Largo, FL
Posts: 88
Total Cats: 0
Default

I'll keep you updated. My goal is 215rwhp with my mp62.
Agent is offline  


Quick Reply: so those of you with a supercharged miata...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.