offset bushings vs. extended lower ball joint - Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain discuss the wondrous effects of boost and your miata...
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

offset bushings vs. extended lower ball joint

Old 11-18-2015, 09:09 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 298
Total Cats: 1
Default offset bushings vs. extended lower ball joint

I installed a set of offset upper bushings last season in an attempt to get adequate negative camber for a good racing alignment. Since then, I ran across a supplier for an extended lower ball joint; which seems a simpler plan.

I think that the drawbacks to the offset upper bushing was that it made tire/shock interference a little more likely, esp with wide wheels/tires; but otherwise left camber curve un-effected. There was also a question of bushing slippage during operation.

I believe that the extended lower ball joint method would give you less problem with tire/shock body interference, but I believe that by increasing the length of the lower control arm it would also increase the rate of camber change (which might be a good thing) and perhaps induce a little bump steer as well.

Has anyone measured after installing these; or checked into this otherwise?
gtred is offline  
Old 11-18-2015, 09:25 PM
  #2  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,445
Total Cats: 1,618
Default

You can put an offset bushing in the lower control arm if you don't want to loose tire clearance.

https://www.miataturbo.net/build-thr...4/#post1274250
aidandj is offline  
Old 12-13-2015, 08:24 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 112
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by gtred View Post
I believe that the extended lower ball joint method would give you less problem with tire/shock body interference, but I believe that by increasing the length of the lower control arm it would also increase the rate of camber change (which might be a good thing) and perhaps induce a little bump steer as well.

Has anyone measured after installing these; or checked into this otherwise?

+1

Would really like to hear from anyone after installing these. It should be (famous last words) a better solution for us with clearance issues.

Whilst things vary from car to car, with ISC offset upper bush to get to my desired settings (at 4.5" front pinch ride height -> 3.5 deg -Ve camber) my camber adjusters are set to about 1/2. I am curious where people installing these end up with similar settings...???
Neddy is offline  
Old 12-13-2015, 09:04 PM
  #4  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,445
Total Cats: 1,618
Default

Upper offset bushing is fail.

Either do ELBJ, or offset lower control arm bushing.
aidandj is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
greddygalant
Miata parts for sale/trade
8
02-19-2016 07:07 PM
aidandj
MEGAsquirt
26
11-18-2015 12:08 PM
MeOtter
DIY Turbo Discussion
40
11-18-2015 09:20 AM
black roadster
Track Dog Racing
4
11-12-2015 07:02 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: offset bushings vs. extended lower ball joint


Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.