RPM Act and the EPA
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chaparral, New Mexico
Posts: 200
Total Cats: 9
RPM Act and the EPA
I haven't seen a thread on this yet, I have barely started seeing YouTube channels talking about it so I don't want to give details I'm not yet versed in but wanted to bring attention to you guys if you haven't seen it. Apparently the EPA is coming after race cars. Sema has setup a petition page to send to your local politicians on the issue.
https://www.sema.org/epa-news
https://www.sema.org/epa-news
#2
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
I've done almost no research on this but from what I've heard they were coming after registered vehicles with "off road" parts and tunes on them. Not actual non registered and insured race cars that are actually only used "off road".
#3
I'm no expert on the ins and outs of this, but apparently an exemption for emission controls has long existed for street cars that have been converted for racing use and are no longer street driven. Think spec Miatas: sold as an emission controlled street car, now a race car never to see the street again.
EPA allegedly wants to eliminate this exemption, which would require any vehicle that started 'life' with emissions equipment to retain it, regardless of use.
If this does happen, it would be a huge problem for the aftermarket that supports racing. Even if it doesn't happen, EPA has been going after manufacturers of parts that defeat emissions devices sold "for off road use only" that clearly end up on street vehicles. The big targets have been in the diesel community so far, but companies like DIY Autotune need to be treading very carefully...
EPA allegedly wants to eliminate this exemption, which would require any vehicle that started 'life' with emissions equipment to retain it, regardless of use.
If this does happen, it would be a huge problem for the aftermarket that supports racing. Even if it doesn't happen, EPA has been going after manufacturers of parts that defeat emissions devices sold "for off road use only" that clearly end up on street vehicles. The big targets have been in the diesel community so far, but companies like DIY Autotune need to be treading very carefully...
#6
I keep waiting to hear a "pop pop pop CLUNK" sound as someone's engine gives out.
#8
Here's the other side of the argument: https://blog.ucsusa.org/dave-cooke/t...o-ruin-our-air
I'm inclined to agree with the linked article. I don't like that the EPA could come after "us", but SEMA is trying to manipulate the situation for their member's benefit, not ours. Taking away the EPAs ability to go after the coal rollers doesn't seem to have much to do with " saving race cars".
I'm inclined to agree with the linked article. I don't like that the EPA could come after "us", but SEMA is trying to manipulate the situation for their member's benefit, not ours. Taking away the EPAs ability to go after the coal rollers doesn't seem to have much to do with " saving race cars".
#9
Relevant quotes from the UCS article linked above. See article for sourcing.
"The most obvious reason we know SEMA is not just trying to protect the racing industry is that less than 5 percent of the past motor vehicle enforcement which would have been limited under the RPM Act is for cars. By far, the biggest category of vehicle affected by the passage of the RPM Act would be diesel-powered trucks, which I’m pretty sure are not the “dedicated racecars” SEMA claims to be defending."
"SEMA claims to care about hobbyist racers, but all it would take to protect racers and the racing industry would be clear guidance from EPA on converting a motor vehicle into a competition-only vehicle. EPA already has such rules in place for imported cars and off-road dirtbikes—having Congress direct the agency to find a similar path for decertification of a motor vehicle to exclude it from highway travel would have been the obvious strategy."
This is clearly an opinion piece and not straight news, I found it enlightening. I didn't know the <5% thing, though I'm not surprised, and I didn't know that there was already guidance like what would be necessary for actual race cars. I'm always suspicious when some dues-collecting group starts playing Chicken Little (looking at you, NRA). Seems there's good reason to keep doing that...
"The most obvious reason we know SEMA is not just trying to protect the racing industry is that less than 5 percent of the past motor vehicle enforcement which would have been limited under the RPM Act is for cars. By far, the biggest category of vehicle affected by the passage of the RPM Act would be diesel-powered trucks, which I’m pretty sure are not the “dedicated racecars” SEMA claims to be defending."
"SEMA claims to care about hobbyist racers, but all it would take to protect racers and the racing industry would be clear guidance from EPA on converting a motor vehicle into a competition-only vehicle. EPA already has such rules in place for imported cars and off-road dirtbikes—having Congress direct the agency to find a similar path for decertification of a motor vehicle to exclude it from highway travel would have been the obvious strategy."
This is clearly an opinion piece and not straight news, I found it enlightening. I didn't know the <5% thing, though I'm not surprised, and I didn't know that there was already guidance like what would be necessary for actual race cars. I'm always suspicious when some dues-collecting group starts playing Chicken Little (looking at you, NRA). Seems there's good reason to keep doing that...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post