Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Rotrex Built Engine NB! Come at me bro!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2013, 01:09 PM
  #161  
Ian
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 167
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
because it's slow.
I'll take that as a no on ever driving a Rotrex car. As expected.
Ian is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:11 PM
  #162  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

you forgot the part where I didn't care...

centrifugal turbos, yes I've driven on them, on a small displacement motor, will always be and has always been considered a joke, and I will continue to treat them as such.

Even on 5.0L v8 I didn't prefer it to a TT setup on the same motor, or even just a 500 shot of nitrous.


IB4 Emilio comes in and says a bunch of stuff about how easy they are to drive and im dumb.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:12 PM
  #163  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I've driven other cars with centrifugal superchargers. I would tend to agree with him. Does that count?
18psi is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:20 PM
  #164  
Ian
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 167
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
you forgot the part where I didn't care...
If that were actually true, you wouldn't waste your time coming into every Rotrex thread to post that same dyno over and over again.
Ian is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:28 PM
  #165  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

sounds like u mad
18psi is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:29 PM
  #166  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

I don't post it in everyone. I used to post shitty greddy kit dynos compared to other rotrex setups.

like:



I only posted it here because someone else posted that $50K dyno and I like to troll, be annoying, and simply do things that **** others off and entertain myself; especially on a turbo site.

And hell, I just did the same in Curly's dyno thread. And he's a mod, and has a turbo...
Attached Thumbnails Rotrex Built Engine NB! Come at me bro!-rotrex2.jpg  

Last edited by Braineack; 02-27-2013 at 01:41 PM.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:37 PM
  #167  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

Originally Posted by Ian
If that were actually true, you wouldn't waste your time coming into every Rotrex thread to post that same dyno over and over again.
Perhaps you missed the part where the OP asked us to convince him to go turbo.

Brain is a troll, but here his trolling was actually requested.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:45 PM
  #168  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

Edit: I have no idea how this double post happened ten minutes after the last one. Piece of crap computer is my only thought.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com

Last edited by turbofan; 02-27-2013 at 02:35 PM.
turbofan is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:49 PM
  #169  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

double post ten minutes later.

and im less of a troll and more of a debby downer.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:59 PM
  #170  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

I think OP should keep his rotrex... AND GO TURBO

Twincharged ****. Mad crazy spoolin plus teh exhaust scavengings for +1 horespoewrs...!

Just need to figure out how to squeeze a turbo behind that poopercharger.
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 01:59 PM
  #171  
Ian
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 167
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
you forgot the part where I didn't care...

centrifugal turbos, yes I've driven on them, on a small displacement motor, will always be and has always been considered a joke, and I will continue to treat them as such.

Even on 5.0L v8 I didn't prefer it to a TT setup on the same motor, or even just a 500 shot of nitrous.


IB4 Emilio comes in and says a bunch of stuff about how easy they are to drive and im dumb.
Ninja-edit abuse of admin to make yourself look better
Ian is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 02:09 PM
  #172  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

If you were here more often, you'd see I ninja edit like every post I make. i edited post 166 like 5 times before i was finally done.

everyone has an edit button for the first 10 minutes or so of a post, that's not an abuse if everyone can do it. I simply added information, i dont believe it made me look "any better"

when i start editing your posts...then you can cry about admin tomfoolerly. there is no thing as abuse when you make up the rules.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 02:19 PM
  #173  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

Wait: Scott, where did you get those Rotrex numbers?

Originally Posted by Braineack
when i start editing your posts...then you can cry about admin tomfoolerly. there is no thing as abuse when you make up the rules.
^^ That's a sig worthy quote if I've ever seen one
EO2K is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 02:21 PM
  #174  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

a few years ago back when the Greecean Goddesses were first fooling with them.... why?
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 02:31 PM
  #175  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

I'm just wondering about the pulley ratio and the size of that particular head unit.

A Rotrex C30-94 is rated at 0.39 kg/s at the top end, that's 51.59 lb/min for us 'Mericans. A Borg Warner EFR 6258 is "only" rated at 44lb/min according to the boys at FullRace.

I dunno... just seems... off. Though I will admit, I don't know how to read a compressor chart.
EO2K is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 03:29 PM
  #176  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Mobius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,468
Total Cats: 365
Default

The rotrex cannot (and will never) win area under the curve arguments. That's also why it will probably never be seen in any racing classes that allow forced induction mods - witness Crusher getting a 6258. Unless the racing organization does something convoluted with how they define and allow power adders, the turbo will win.

Where the rotrex wins, for some people, is simplicity and reliability. You cannot get boost creep. You don't have massive underhood temps to deal with. You don't have studs backing out/loosening. Installation and removal are pretty simple and straightforward. For about 220whp or so on a stock vvt engine, it's a sound choice for a weekend warrior looking to do reliable track days with more power. Built engine not required. At these power levels the torque line is more reasonably level. It just feels like a bigger motor.

If you want to go racing with more power than that, you should probably go turbo, and do everything that Andrew says to do to keep it reliable. And keep a close eye on whatever info Emilio lets drop about what they're doing to Crusher. And learn from Hustler's build thread.
Mobius is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 03:31 PM
  #177  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

It was on a 1.6L if that changes things...we all know how much those suck.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 03:54 PM
  #178  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
miata2fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dover, FL
Posts: 3,143
Total Cats: 174
Default

I think one of the issues is that they have not figured out what the right supercharger housing is for the Miata. There are more than just one manufacturer of superchargers out there, and more housing sizes also.

Keep in mind how many turbo housing options there are on the market today, and how much time has been given to select the right housing for a Miata. Much more can be done in the centrifugal camp to make them work properly.

Remember when some of you were laughing at me because I thought a valve controlled the overall boost on a centrifigal? I knew I was not crazy and that they existed somewhere.

Vortech Centrifugal Supercharger Wastegate Install - Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords Magazine

I suspect that a larger blower housing with an overall boost controller would have a better chance of having a turbocharged power and torque curve.
miata2fast is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 03:59 PM
  #179  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by Mobius
The rotrex cannot (and will never) win area under the curve arguments. That's also why it will probably never be seen in any racing classes that allow forced induction mods - witness Crusher getting a 6258. Unless the racing organization does something convoluted with how they define and allow power adders, the turbo will win.

Where the rotrex wins, for some people, is simplicity and reliability. You cannot get boost creep. You don't have massive underhood temps to deal with. You don't have studs backing out/loosening. Installation and removal are pretty simple and straightforward. For about 220whp or so on a stock vvt engine, it's a sound choice for a weekend warrior looking to do reliable track days with more power. Built engine not required. At these power levels the torque line is more reasonably level. It just feels like a bigger motor.

If you want to go racing with more power than that, you should probably go turbo, and do everything that Andrew says to do to keep it reliable. And keep a close eye on whatever info Emilio lets drop about what they're doing to Crusher. And learn from Hustler's build thread.
Well said.

And I agree completely.

Props.
18psi is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 04:48 PM
  #180  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
miata2fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dover, FL
Posts: 3,143
Total Cats: 174
Default

Originally Posted by Mobius
The rotrex cannot (and will never) win area under the curve arguments. That's also why it will probably never be seen in any racing classes that allow forced induction mods - witness Crusher getting a 6258. Unless the racing organization does something convoluted with how they define and allow power adders, the turbo will win.
I did a quick google search, and found that there are many championships in drag racing with centrifugals. I could not find much on road racing though. Interestingly enough, Rotrex does very well in the world of Jet
Ski racing.
miata2fast is offline  


Quick Reply: Rotrex Built Engine NB! Come at me bro!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.