The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
#5363
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,072
Total Cats: 6,625
On July 8, 1776, a group of Pennsylvania militiamen stormed into the state supreme court chamber of the Pennsylvania State House, which we today know as Independence Hall, said building having also housed the Second Continental Congress and served as the birthplace of both the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution.
Said militiamen tore down a large wooden carving of the Coat of Arms of King George III, which until that point had hung prominently at the center of the forward wall of the room, directly above the bench. They dragged the carving out into the street where it was beaten to splinters and then set ablaze.
Would you argue that this act, while violent and dramatic, was not a form of political speech? Did it not symbolize the desire of these men to throw off the shackles of the British monarch and revolt in order to gain their independence?
#5364
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
Are you familiar with the old adage that "Actions speak louder than words?"
On July 8, 1776, a group of Pennsylvania militiamen stormed into the state supreme court chamber of the Pennsylvania State House, which we today know as Independence Hall, said building having also housed the Second Continental Congress and served as the birthplace of both the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution.
Said militiamen tore down a large wooden carving of the Coat of Arms of King George III, which until that point had hung prominently at the center of the forward wall of the room, directly above the bench. They dragged the carving out into the street where it was beaten to splinters and then set ablaze.
Would you argue that this act, while violent and dramatic, was not a form of political speech? Did it not symbolize the desire of these men to throw off the shackles of the British monarch and revolt in order to gain their independence?
On July 8, 1776, a group of Pennsylvania militiamen stormed into the state supreme court chamber of the Pennsylvania State House, which we today know as Independence Hall, said building having also housed the Second Continental Congress and served as the birthplace of both the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution.
Said militiamen tore down a large wooden carving of the Coat of Arms of King George III, which until that point had hung prominently at the center of the forward wall of the room, directly above the bench. They dragged the carving out into the street where it was beaten to splinters and then set ablaze.
Would you argue that this act, while violent and dramatic, was not a form of political speech? Did it not symbolize the desire of these men to throw off the shackles of the British monarch and revolt in order to gain their independence?
However, we can all speak in the public square.
It was indeed an act of drama, and it was conveying a strong message. It was, nontheless, more than speech, it was also an act of vandalism that I do not believe should be protected under the 1st amendment.
#5365
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,072
Total Cats: 6,625
The key idea, however, was to ascertain whether, in addition to constituting vandalism, said act also constituted symbolic political speech, in the same way that burning an effigy which depicts a political leader might as well.
If so, then it is also possible for the burning of a flag to similarly constitute political speech, and if the flag in question is the personal property of the individual destroying it, then no related property-crime exists.
Last edited by Braineack; 10-08-2019 at 09:48 AM.
#5366
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
I can grant you that it would be symbolic free speech. Should symbolic speech be protected, or just real speech? Also, it is not just political speech that is protected.
Additionally, would laws regarding prescribed care of the flag be violations of the First Amendment? There are laws that say I cannot make sexual inuendos to a co-worker that has informed me that such are offensive.
Additionally, would laws regarding prescribed care of the flag be violations of the First Amendment? There are laws that say I cannot make sexual inuendos to a co-worker that has informed me that such are offensive.
#5367
Yes symbolic speech should be protected. I get the distinction you're trying to make, but it's ultimately a futile one.
Then again, it also depends on what dictionary you want to use:
the faculty or power of speaking; oral communication; ability to express one's thoughts and emotions by speech sounds and gesture
Then again, it also depends on what dictionary you want to use:
the faculty or power of speaking; oral communication; ability to express one's thoughts and emotions by speech sounds and gesture
#5369
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,072
Total Cats: 6,625
In Smith v. Goguen (1974), the court stated:
Although neither written nor spoken, an act may be sufficiently communicative to invoke the protection of the First Amendment, and may not be forbidden by law except when incidental to preventing unprotected conduct or unless the communication is itself among those that fall outside the protection of the First Amendment.
True. The distinction is merely that political speech has historically enjoyed an even greater level of constitutional protection than non-political speech (eg: criticism of political officers and candidates for political office are afforded less protection from libel than private citizens), and the issue at hand in matters concerning desecration of the flag tend to involve political speech, and more specifically, the separately protected petitioning of the government for a redress of grievances.
Said laws treat such behavior as a form of assault, and are therefore in the same class as laws which prohibit me from murdering people who are a different color from me as a way of freely expressing my views on ethnic separatism. Or, put another way, my rights (to free expression) end where yours (to life and liberty) begin.
#5370
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
I know the SCoUS has ruled that it is OK to desecrate the flag, but I personally do not agree with their decision.
I had not realized that they had prohibited states from passing laws honoring it, but that is not the same as preventing desecration, so I would agree with that.
As Z31 said, my quest is likely futile, given that 1974 was a long time ago.
I had not realized that they had prohibited states from passing laws honoring it, but that is not the same as preventing desecration, so I would agree with that.
As Z31 said, my quest is likely futile, given that 1974 was a long time ago.
#5374
Killing the U.S. now:
Men not at work | Power Line
Killing the U.S. soon:
Ann Coulter - July 1, 2015 - MEDIA HIDE FACTS, CALL EVERYONE ELSE A LIAR
Look up the 10 most wanted list in your nearest big city. Is that list representative of the makeup of the country, or it's neighbors?
Men not at work | Power Line
Killing the U.S. soon:
Ann Coulter - July 1, 2015 - MEDIA HIDE FACTS, CALL EVERYONE ELSE A LIAR
Look up the 10 most wanted list in your nearest big city. Is that list representative of the makeup of the country, or it's neighbors?
#5375
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,507
Total Cats: 4,080
Killing the U.S. soon:
Ann Coulter - July 1, 2015 - MEDIA HIDE FACTS, CALL EVERYONE ELSE A LIAR
Look up the 10 most wanted list in your nearest big city. Is that list representative of the makeup of the country, or it's neighbors?
Ann Coulter - July 1, 2015 - MEDIA HIDE FACTS, CALL EVERYONE ELSE A LIAR
Look up the 10 most wanted list in your nearest big city. Is that list representative of the makeup of the country, or it's neighbors?
After getting escorted out of the store by security, the protesters reconvened outside the entrance, shouting “Shame on you!” to those who walked out holding a copy of Coulter’s book. At one point, the group ripped up a copy of the book, littering the space outside the store with paper.
“Don’t have kids! Don’t have kids!” one of the protesters screamed at an older couple exiting the store.
“You have to understand,” Coulter told Breitbart News, “screaming and defacing things is how Latin Americans express disagreement. At least as long as they were destroying books and screaming in a book store, they weren’t molesting any 4-year-olds.”
...
“Immigration is a government policy like any other and it ought to be used to benefit the people already living here. That includes recent immigrants,” Coulter said. “There should not be any criminals coming in.”
“Don’t have kids! Don’t have kids!” one of the protesters screamed at an older couple exiting the store.
“You have to understand,” Coulter told Breitbart News, “screaming and defacing things is how Latin Americans express disagreement. At least as long as they were destroying books and screaming in a book store, they weren’t molesting any 4-year-olds.”
...
“Immigration is a government policy like any other and it ought to be used to benefit the people already living here. That includes recent immigrants,” Coulter said. “There should not be any criminals coming in.”
#5377
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,072
Total Cats: 6,625
While I understand that they have neither the desire nor the experience in matters of foreign policy and diplomacy to lead a nation, I think I'd still vote for Penn & Teller in 2016.
#5378
While I understand that they have neither the desire nor the experience in matters of foreign policy and diplomacy to lead a nation, I think I'd still vote for Penn & Teller in 2016.
penn n teller burn flag wmv - YouTube
penn n teller burn flag wmv - YouTube
#5379
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,507
Total Cats: 4,080
this is exactly why a jurt trial should scare you:
Juror discusses trespassing trial | News - Home
This juror is a complete moron, he couldn't even support why he gave a guilty verdict to someone "trespassing" on public property. This is also why if I was ever on trial, I'd make sure to that stating the law was part of the jury instructions.
Juror discusses trespassing trial | News - Home
VIDEO: One of the jurors who returned a guilty verdict against Michale Hoffman who was arrested for trespassing at the airport, spoke to News4Jax following the one year probation sentencing.
#5380
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,072
Total Cats: 6,625
In every state that I'm aware of, stating the law is always part of the judge's instructions to the jury prior to releasing them to deliberation. If the judge fails to instruct the jury on the relevant points of law, then this may be used as grounds for the defense to motion for a mistrial, or to be used at appeal. In fact, faulty jury instructions are one of the more commonly cited issues in the overturning of criminal convictions.
Further reading:
http://law-journals-books.vlex.com/v...nsion-53091759
http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/c...ext=fss_papers
https://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN...256f820075d2bc