DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

GT3071 on stock 1.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2010, 02:45 PM
  #21  
Newb
 
DLN84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 27
Total Cats: 0
Default

This thing will be extremely laggy. I ran a fully built Audi A4 1.9L 9.5:1 compression with meth injection and full 3 inch exhaust all the way through. Got full 24 psi at 4800 RPM.
DLN84 is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 03:18 PM
  #22  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,977
Total Cats: 356
Default

I've tuned one, 1.6L built engine (Wisecos and Eagle rods) on a '97 chassis.

7psi at 5100rpm, I kid you not.

Honestly, sell it and get a 2560.
Reverant is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 04:02 PM
  #23  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

just change your redline to 9,000rpm and you will be fine.

OPG's ATI dampner and the mazdacomp lifter kit with intake manifold and cam gears.
shlammed is offline  
Old 09-25-2010, 11:36 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
jtothawhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,376
Total Cats: 4
Default

I've had a bigger turbo on my 1.6L depends on your horsepower goals, I don't understand why people are so scared to go big on a Miata.
jtothawhat is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 12:17 AM
  #25  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Me either.
18psi is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 03:41 AM
  #26  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southlake,Texas
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 15
Default

Originally Posted by jtothawhat
I've had a bigger turbo on my 1.6L depends on your horsepower goals, I don't understand why people are so scared to go big on a Miata.
Because **** breaks at 250whp and that power level can be achieved by more responsive turbo. Assuming stock motor of course.
Bond is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 04:05 AM
  #27  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,977
Total Cats: 356
Default

I'm sure a GT42 turbo fits under the hood, why not try that?

What fun is a miata that doesn't have boost until 5000rpm? The 2871 is probably the biggest turbo I would go with on a 1.8. I've tried all sorts of different combinations on many cars I've tuned and driven, from a smaller-than-T25 on a 93, a 2560 on a '00 1.6, a 2860 on 1.8 '00, a 2871 on 2002 1.8 to a 3071 on a '97 1.6.

I didn't like the 3071 on the 1.6 at all. I loved the 2560 on the 1.6, very easy to drive around at 12psi, hugely fun. The 2002 on the 2871 was a beast (420rwhp at 23psi) but you could still have fun because it made 14psi at 4000rpm, and 7-8psi at 3300rpm.
Reverant is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 05:10 AM
  #28  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default



3076 on my 00 1.8

It is a TON of fun and great around town.
~5psi down low generates enough grunt to be able to get out of your own way, then after 4 all hell breaks loose.
People often forget that with a large turbo flowing large ammounts of air you can massage the ignition down low even at low boost and make up for quite a bit of the "lag"


In a perfect world I'd have a 2L 35R weekend toy and 2560 low boost quiet/soft "daily"
18psi is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 11:04 AM
  #29  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,977
Total Cats: 356
Default

On the 1.6:

Reverant is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 02:52 PM
  #30  
Newb
 
xCOLEx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 10
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
3076 on my 00 1.8

It is a TON of fun and great around town.
~5psi down low generates enough grunt to be able to get out of your own way, then after 4 all hell breaks loose.
People often forget that with a large turbo flowing large ammounts of air you can massage the ignition down low even at low boost and make up for quite a bit of the "lag"


In a perfect world I'd have a 2L 35R weekend toy and 2560 low boost quiet/soft "daily"
What do you mean by "massage the ignition down low"? Retard the timing? Im very curious because i plan on getting a T3/T4 50 a/r 57 trim for my stock 1.6. Im afraid this would be to laggy also.
xCOLEx is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 04:35 PM
  #31  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

advance it in the low low reigons with no boost to try to keep it quick and retard it right before the turbo spools to help it spool up faster has worked for me.
shlammed is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 05:10 PM
  #32  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Pretty much.

And the graph reverant posted is identical to mine in shape but about 1300rpm to the right.

Might be a LITTLE too laggy for a 1.6, now that I see when it hits peak boost
18psi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
01-03-2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
10-03-2015 11:04 AM
Trent
WTB
2
10-01-2015 12:15 PM



Quick Reply: GT3071 on stock 1.6



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 AM.