NB 2560 dyno @ 11psi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2010, 10:04 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 182
Default NB 2560 dyno @ 11psi

Dyno'd my car a local dyno day this weekend. Unfortunately they weren't able to get a tach signal off my COPS so I didn't get any torque readings. I made 213hp @ 11psi.

I dyno'd my old NA on the same dyno at 12psi and made 212hp, 188tq. I was able to overlay the dyno and made a good bit more midrange power in the NB and did a little better up top in the NA (better flowing exhaust). I'm guessing this car would have made something around 200tq given the better midrange numbers.

What I got of a dyno sheet:


Video:


I've been a little disappointed with the cars power since I turbo'd it. I feel like it should be making more power than it is. Given the cars I've raced and times I ran at the track it actually put down a little more than I was expecting though.
pdexta is offline  
Old 09-14-2010, 10:08 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
aaronc7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,116
Total Cats: 43
Default

whats your complete build details?? exhaust, injectors, fmic setup, etc etc
aaronc7 is offline  
Old 09-14-2010, 10:12 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 182
Default

It's the slightly hacked up reminants of my BEGI S3 off my NA. Racing Beat exhaust (2.375", I know, I know). 550rc injectors and a Brain Megasquirt that probably needs more timing.
pdexta is offline  
Old 09-14-2010, 10:13 PM
  #4  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

lol and you expected much more?

you got a small turbo with a very restrictive exhaust pushing not that much boost.
Not bad all things considered
18psi is offline  
Old 09-14-2010, 10:30 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 182
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
lol and you expected much more?

you got a small turbo with a very restrictive exhaust pushing not that much boost.
Not bad all things considered
Thanks. I wasn't expecting all that much more, I just felt like the car would be quicker than it is. I guess a lot of that has to do with going from a gutted NA to a stock weight NB.
pdexta is offline  
Old 09-14-2010, 10:54 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

Needs to be uncapped for sure.
12 psi with a 2560 on a dynojet, I would expect a bit more.
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 09-14-2010, 11:12 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

You need more flow.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline  
Old 09-14-2010, 11:21 PM
  #8  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

take out the tampon and let it all out
18psi is offline  
Old 09-14-2010, 11:23 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
aaronc7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,116
Total Cats: 43
Default

yeah i would expect a lil more out of a 99 at 12 psi, but it sounds like you could really benefit from a turbo exhaust
aaronc7 is offline  
Old 09-14-2010, 11:40 PM
  #10  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by aaronc7
yeah i would expect a lil more out of a 99 at 12 psi, but it sounds like you could really benefit from a turbo exhaust
I hope you meant free flowing.
Cause "turbo" mufflers are fail.
Straight through = win
18psi is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 12:30 AM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (28)
 
p51hellfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: St. Augustine FL
Posts: 2,299
Total Cats: 2
Default

Dang Pdexta you still haven't replaced that exhaust??? didn't you have it on there even when it was NA???
p51hellfire is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 09:20 AM
  #12  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
webby459's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,461
Total Cats: 4
Default

iirc I made around 250whp at around 10-11psi on E85, dynapak. We tuned timing for mbt and didn't pull back any, though. It made a sizable difference in output.
webby459 is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 10:05 AM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
buffon01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
Default

Straight pipe
buffon01 is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 10:29 AM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
leatherface24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pembroke Pines
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Straight through = win
I couldnt agree more! 3 inch from the turbo out and i bet youll make alot more power then what you just did. And if you really wanna be obnoxious like me, dont run a muffler or resonator
leatherface24 is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 11:14 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
aaronc7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,116
Total Cats: 43
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I hope you meant free flowing.
Cause "turbo" mufflers are fail.
Straight through = win
what the heck is a turbo muffler? lol I just mean an exhaust designed for turbo... aka 2.5 or 3" ideally and straight thru muffler of course, always used magnaflow myself....which is what I have being made at the moment from ARtech
aaronc7 is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 12:37 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
vw_nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Auburn Maine
Posts: 184
Total Cats: 0
Default

Turbo muffler is traditionally a muffler with chambers that is not straight through. Look at a dynomax superturbo muffler. Straight through mufflers will flow much better, but usally are louder.
vw_nut is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 12:39 PM
  #17  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

that cause they use muffling for muffling, instead of chambers and sound wave cancellation. they are moar better.
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 01:41 PM
  #18  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
that cause they use muffling for muffling, instead of chambers and sound wave cancellation. they are moar better.
those flowmaster chambers/walls are pretty weaksauce too. next time you're at disneyland, try to run fast through the zigzag ropes to the ride entrance and see if it's easier than just running straight through a tunnel with holes in it.
y8s is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 02:07 PM
  #19  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I tried that and Mickey Mouse told me to GTFO
18psi is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 02:48 PM
  #20  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
leatherface24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pembroke Pines
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
Default

You tried tried running right into mickys hole again huh
leatherface24 is offline  


Quick Reply: NB 2560 dyno @ 11psi



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.