I'm going in, cover me... (Built 1.8L GT2871)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2010, 06:27 PM
  #101  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
So you have the drive to crank the boost yet?
If you mean more boost at higher RPM, I am still working on the characterization/analysis for that. The basic idea is sound so it is just a matter of looking at the details. It is tempting to just try it but I am exercising caution since 'just trying it' is why I have previously blown two other motors. More on that boost ramping thing later, do not hold your breath.

A/C coming soon, hopefully this weekend. My South Texas brethren can attest to the current significance of this.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 06-23-2010, 06:40 PM
  #102  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
chicksdigmiatas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas, 'Murica
Posts: 2,497
Total Cats: 0
Default

Amen for ac. I am piecing my back together now as well. It didn't matter so much in the mountains.
chicksdigmiatas is offline  
Old 06-23-2010, 07:20 PM
  #103  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TrickerZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
Posts: 850
Total Cats: 16
Default

I was wondering what you were going to do about the WI. I'll probably just get the 4 nozzles added on my DO kit and still modulate the pump. You were supposed to come up with some cool failsafe to run crazy timing that I could copy! I'm curious what DC you're running with those nozzles at the highest boost/RPM setting? I don't plan on anything above 18psi and am trying to figure out what nozzles to get for my water/meth injection.

Good numbers, so I'm eager to see what my little 1.6 will do.
TrickerZ is offline  
Old 06-23-2010, 08:22 PM
  #104  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

So here is the latest deal with the WI system. I'll update there to keep from jacking this thread and to avoid redundancy.
https://www.miataturbo.net/showthrea...t=43475&page=3
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 06-27-2010, 08:05 PM
  #105  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

Fixed the A/C FTMFW.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 06-27-2010, 11:29 PM
  #106  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
chpmnsws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Springfield IL
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 25
Default

Isn't the car so much nicer to drive now?

I got the AC working in the LS car and it is nice pulling it in and out of the barn/shop
chpmnsws6 is offline  
Old 07-09-2010, 03:42 PM
  #107  
Newb
 
snakeeyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 31
Total Cats: 0
Default

Nice numbers. Corey has tuned a bunch of cars for me and he knows his stuff and is an all-around good guy. Besides, how can you not like a guy who shares his building with a liquor store?
snakeeyes is offline  
Old 07-14-2010, 06:54 PM
  #108  
Newb
 
turbodragnovice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 8
Total Cats: 0
Default

Could you effectively autocross with the gt2871? Or, would you do much better with the powerband of the 2560?

I want the best trade off of max power (around 300) and midrange torque/low boost threshold.
turbodragnovice is offline  
Old 07-14-2010, 07:01 PM
  #109  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

I would definitely use a 2560 over the 2871 for auto-x. For a road course I would use the 2871 for the improved efficiency. Dual purpose (auto-x and road course) 2560.

Read up some more here and at miata.net as this has been discussed to death. Just do not get a 2554 unless you never plan to make big power.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 11:51 PM
  #110  
Newb
 
snakeeyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 31
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by turbodragnovice
Could you effectively autocross with the gt2871? Or, would you do much better with the powerband of the 2560?

I want the best trade off of max power (around 300) and midrange torque/low boost threshold.
dvcn autocrosses with a T3/4 and a zillion pounds of boost, on the crappiest tires you've ever seen. He will then turn around and run a 12.56 quarter. To top it off, his gauges have Hello Kitty faces on them. In other words, the perfect car. Perhaps he'll tell us how he does it (in another thread to avoid hijacking ZX's).
snakeeyes is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 06:59 PM
  #111  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
Build Details:

Short block:
1999 NB 1.8L
FM Wiseco pistons, 9:1

Cylinder head:
1999 cylinder head
.
.
.
BEGI S4 tubular manifold
Garret GT2871 turbo, 0.64 A/R, Anti-surge compressor housing (ATP Turbo)
Hey I thought the small a/r is worthless on the GT28xx on a 1,8?
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 10-26-2011, 07:02 PM
  #112  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

I would say 'worthless' is a gross overstatement. Others have used the 0.86 A/R housing, giving up 200-300 RPM in spool RPM for a bit more power at high RPM. Not a big deal, pick the one you like, the 2871 is awesome either way.

The car has been parted since I started this thread. But I drove the car that my old turbo system is in and it freaking rips. Love it, especially with the E85 fuel the owner is running. Spool is great and he does not even have an MBC in it yet.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 02:16 PM
  #113  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ILoveOffRamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 181
Total Cats: 5
Default

Zx-Tex Your PMs are full.
Do you remember what trim you were running?
ILoveOffRamps is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 04:03 PM
  #114  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

Yeah sorry my membership expired so I went from not to many PMs to way too many overnight.

IIRC I had the 56 trim with the 'anti-surge machining option' and the 0.64 A/R turbine housing with the internal wastegate. It was purchased from ATP through BEGI.
http://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchant...egory_Code=GRT

BEGI ported the wastegate and I never had problems with boost creep even at 300+ RWHP.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 04:16 PM
  #115  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
I would say 'worthless' is a gross overstatement. Others have used the 0.86 A/R housing, giving up 200-300 RPM in spool RPM for a bit more power at high RPM. Not a big deal, pick the one you like, the 2871 is awesome either way.
My built '99 with a 2871R .86 made the same power down low and 25whp more up top at the same boost level (305whp@18psi).
Savington is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 06:38 PM
  #116  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Without the VVT?
JasonC SBB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigmackloud
Miata parts for sale/trade
19
01-08-2021 11:24 AM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM
nick470
MEGAsquirt
1
09-30-2015 10:32 PM
Rhidell
Meet and Greet
1
09-27-2015 09:42 AM



Quick Reply: I'm going in, cover me... (Built 1.8L GT2871)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 AM.