Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Naturally Aspirated - Anyone Gut VICS Manifold?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2019, 08:50 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
LuckyKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 88
Total Cats: 5
Default Naturally Aspirated - Anyone Gut VICS Manifold?

I know there are many threads about improvements of the VTCS manifold being gutted, but less so on the VICS. Has anyone done this for an NA application and seen gains?

We are allowed to do this in Champcar so long as its done by hand and we currently are at 145-148RWHP with a JDM 99-00 motor a megasquirt, straight intake, and header. We would get points for the squaretop or any other aftermarket manifold, so we don't want to go that route.

We set our rev limit to 6950 and would hit a low RPM of 4700 in race conditions (lowest speed 3rd gear) and 5200RPM on our up shifts.

Any thoughts on someone who has done this, or ideally anyone who's dyno'ed this, your thoughts would be very much appreciated!

Thanks,
Lucky Kid
www.ruggedbadger.com
LuckyKid is offline  
Old 11-15-2019, 09:39 AM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

There was a lot of discussion about this back in the day. From what I recall it turned out to not work well at all. The big plenum volume was probably a good idea, but making the runners that much shorter was not, and the poorly shaped transition between the throttle and the plenum was still a problem.

Just buy a flat-top or a Skank2
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 11-15-2019, 10:17 AM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Stealth97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canton, Ga
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 66
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
There was a lot of discussion about this back in the day. From what I recall it turned out to not work well at all. The big plenum volume was probably a good idea, but making the runners that much shorter was not, and the poorly shaped transition between the throttle and the plenum was still a problem.

Just buy a flat-top or a Skank2
This.

If you want to step up your manifold game, get a skunk or a flat top.
Stealth97 is offline  
Old 11-15-2019, 10:49 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
LuckyKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 88
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
There was a lot of discussion about this back in the day. From what I recall it turned out to not work well at all. The big plenum volume was probably a good idea, but making the runners that much shorter was not, and the poorly shaped transition between the throttle and the plenum was still a problem.

Just buy a flat-top or a Skank2
Thank you for the reply. Buying a new manifold isn't "worth" the points, which can be used on Aero or in other areas on the car. We would need to see ~10RWHP gain to justify the 25 points champcar charges for a manifold.
LuckyKid is offline  
Old 11-15-2019, 11:00 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
tomrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: N. Mi.
Posts: 387
Total Cats: 41
Default

FM has a good dyno graph showing the comparison of a VICS, with working system, the Skunk 2, and flattop. It was on a turbo engine, but the results for the working VICS showed it had a flatter torque curve, and higher output up till 6K. I think the same is true in the NA application. Flattop and Skunk went up at the top of the revs, but IMO, having the more robust, flatter torque with the butterfly's working is the best choice. I'm in the middle of finding the missing bits to enable the BP4W I'm cleaning up, which will go in my '93 for that very reason.
tomrev is offline  
Old 11-15-2019, 11:36 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
LeoNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Central Commie Land
Posts: 614
Total Cats: 55
Default

I don't follow. Are you saying the VIC system changes the runner length?

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
There was a lot of discussion about this back in the day. From what I recall it turned out to not work well at all. The big plenum volume was probably a good idea, but making the runners that much shorter was not, and the poorly shaped transition between the throttle and the plenum was still a problem.

Just buy a flat-top or a Skank2
LeoNA is offline  
Old 11-15-2019, 11:50 AM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

Originally Posted by LeoNA
I don't follow. Are you saying the VIC system changes the runner length?
No, but when you "gut" it, youre cutting out all the material inside, which shortens the runners by quite a bit.
The other way Ive seen it done was where they cut out the top of the resonance chamber so that it connects into the plenum, the idea being that it would be a variable length intake manifold. Im not sure if Ive ever seen a dyno comparison of that, but I know it has been done. My guess is that it would not work well.

EDIT:
Found this thread from back in '12
https://www.miataturbo.net/general-m...testing-66901/

This is the type of "gutting" that I described



but apparently it did seem to work, at least in VD on a turbo car

Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 11-15-2019, 12:10 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
LeoNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Central Commie Land
Posts: 614
Total Cats: 55
Default

I see, I thought you were just referring to removing the shaft and butterfly. The effect of the VIC chamber in the oe form is to increase the manifold/plenum volume which will raise the resonant frequency. If I were only concerned about the output from 4700rpm+ I would remove the shaft and butterfly's.
LeoNA is offline  
Old 11-15-2019, 12:16 PM
  #9  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,956
Total Cats: 1,008
Default

There are no wholesale gains to be made from modifying the VICS manifold. Any gains that might be had up top come at the cost of midrange power.

If you can't do a square top, just make sure VICS is tuned properly and run it.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 11-18-2019, 11:42 AM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Midtenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Murfreesboro,TN
Posts: 2,052
Total Cats: 267
Default

In the same boat as you (Champ Car, NA with a BP4W swap). When we first put the motor in, we made the mistake of blocking/damaging the vacuum chamber in the intake manifold. So our first tune was without working VICS. We added an external vacuum chamber to operate the butterflies after the first race. After a retune and playing with the VICS switch over point we picked up a bunch of mid range torque and the car drove much easier out of the corners.

The major guy posted above is going to do nothing but shorten your runner length and increase your plenum volume. Due to the low revving nature of the BP, you're not going to gain anything from the short runners. You might gain something from extrude honing the intake manifold. I haven't found anything on extrude honing the VICS though. Probably been done in secret.

If you still want to play with a gutted VICS, I have one sitting on my self. I'd let it go for cheap if you want.
Midtenn is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
al_p
Engine Performance
29
05-23-2023 06:31 AM
Stein
Adaptronic
7
12-17-2009 04:42 AM
RotorNutFD3S
Engine Performance
25
01-15-2009 11:12 PM
Sam Amporful
DIY Turbo Discussion
20
09-25-2008 11:26 AM
MikeRiv87
General Miata Chat
4
09-02-2008 04:36 PM



Quick Reply: Naturally Aspirated - Anyone Gut VICS Manifold?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 PM.