The AI-generated cat pictures thread
I've read the early reviews. And like I said, it looks great on paper, and I'm curious to see how it performs in the real world. Maybe AMD will be able to enjoy a few months of relative supremacy in the high-end desktop / workstation market.
...Customarily, yes. At the moment, Intel is having pretty poor yield with the new 10nm process which is expected to be used on Cannonlake, so the next six months or so will be very interesting to watch in that part of the world.
...Customarily, yes. At the moment, Intel is having pretty poor yield with the new 10nm process which is expected to be used on Cannonlake, so the next six months or so will be very interesting to watch in that part of the world.
I've used AMD forever, ready to jump ship to Intel. Unless this new cpu is actually a game changer.
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
There were press conferences where they displayed gaming and streaming performance. There have also been independent reviews done already but they all have been removed from YouTube. I believe early next week you will see the independent reviews start coming out. Maybe not with retail boards, though.
Ryzen reminds me of rising sun.
I thought the point of an amplifier was to deliver a usable signal down a longer run of coax? I have a rooftop mounted antenna which works very well, but I had one channel that I couldn't get a consistent signal on -- it would frequently pixelate, freeze, and drop completely. I used of these RCA preamps and it boosted the delivered signal to the TV (well, computer actually) enough that it is completely stable. Obviously, if you've got a noisy signal to begin with, it's not going to help much, but it worked perfectly for my purpose.
I suck at embedding... gifv guidance anyone?
4hPZWeD.gifv
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Meh. I've been probably 95% Intel and Nvidia for nearly a decade now and have no regrats. I mean yeah, there is some fun in trying to figure out an overclock, BTDT, but I'm at a point where if I need a faster CPU, I buy a faster CPU. Absolutely nothing I do needs to be so bleeding edge that I need to overclock anything, and the E-***** POINTS™ don't matter to me. I've tried to help people with AMD/ATI based systems, both laptops and desktops, and drivers have always been a nightmare. I understand that's gotten better (citation needed) in recent years, but I'd rather have something that I don't have to struggle with to get working correctly with Windows.
Some time in the last couple years I upgraded from an i7 930 to an i7 4790K. Why own a K and and stick it in a H97 board with no overclock? Because **** you, that's why.
Some time in the last couple years I upgraded from an i7 930 to an i7 4790K. Why own a K and and stick it in a H97 board with no overclock? Because **** you, that's why.
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Meh. I've been probably 95% Intel and Nvidia for nearly a decade now and have no regrats. I mean yeah, there is some fun in trying to figure out an overclock, BTDT, but I'm at a point where if I need a faster CPU, I buy a faster CPU. Absolutely nothing I do needs to be so bleeding edge that I need to overclock anything, and the E-***** POINTS™ don't matter to me. I've tried to help people with AMD/ATI based systems, both laptops and desktops, and drivers have always been a nightmare. I understand that's gotten better (citation needed) in recent years, but I'd rather have something that I don't have to struggle with to get working correctly with Windows.
Some time in the last couple years I upgraded from an i7 930 to an i7 4790K. Why own a K and and stick it in a H97 board with no overclock? Because **** you, that's why.
Some time in the last couple years I upgraded from an i7 930 to an i7 4790K. Why own a K and and stick it in a H97 board with no overclock? Because **** you, that's why.
This 4c/4t 965 has been happily overclocked on 4ghz for the better part of 6 years. I don't live on the bleeding edge of technology. I generally skip a generation of GPUs as well. I'm hopping to skip 3 maybe 4 with this 980 on my Ryzen build.
I'm not rebuilding with Ryzen out of necessity. I've been doing just fine on all the latest titles with max settings, even broadcasting and video capture. This build should last me another 8 years minus a GPU or two. I've been anticipating and waiting for the release of this CPU for a long time now.
You can call me a fanboy, because i am.
My first non consumer(off the shelf) AMD build. Before this i was just cramming GPUs in store bought PCs.
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Oh, I have no problem with Fanboyism, isnt that why were are all on this board in the first place? No choice is really wrong, if it works for you it works for you, who are we to look down on you?
Unless its a B6, M45 A2W intake cooler or a powercard, because then you can die in a fire...
Unless its a B6, M45 A2W intake cooler or a powercard, because then you can die in a fire...
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,036
Total Cats: 6,604
This is the last computer I built / installed:
It's slightly less powerful than the Ryzen 1800X, but it also has a slightly lower power consumption. It also doesn't use an Intel CPU.
It's slightly less powerful than the Ryzen 1800X, but it also has a slightly lower power consumption. It also doesn't use an Intel CPU.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,036
Total Cats: 6,604
Heh, it kinda does, actually.
Now that I think about it, a lot of things which I build could be mistaken for terrorist weapons...
Nothing so exciting, though. All it does is this:
More powerful than all of the computers owned by NASA, combined, at the moment man first landed on the moon, including the ones not located on earth. And all it does is produce that graph.
Now that I think about it, a lot of things which I build could be mistaken for terrorist weapons...
Nothing so exciting, though. All it does is this:
More powerful than all of the computers owned by NASA, combined, at the moment man first landed on the moon, including the ones not located on earth. And all it does is produce that graph.