Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2013, 02:05 PM
  #781  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Meanwhile accelerated performance put down over 400whp on the stock motor, ran 11's at like 127, and still haven't broken anything besides 4th gear (from going airborne and shock loading it like crazy upon landing)

Also all major subaru shops doing R&D on these motors confirm that its way more sturdy than all the other subaru boxers, and make more power per mod.
18psi is offline  
Old 07-20-2013, 02:20 PM
  #782  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

FBM is over 600whp on a stock motor as well... Many many dyno runs.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 07-20-2013, 02:22 PM
  #783  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

that 8psi claim was pulled directly from their anus
18psi is offline  
Old 07-20-2013, 02:34 PM
  #784  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Dimitris: It's 3rd hand info and I don't know any details.

18 psi: A GT2860RS is probably perfect for the BRZ. But you're right, a 2560 is probably way better than their Mitsu turbo.

I totally get the concept of taking a superfun sweet chassis like the BRZ with not-so-high limits and Prius tires and not-so-high power on a mountain road, compared to taking say, a 400 hp 996TT, whose high limits mean you have to be going a lot faster to have fun. However, on USA twisty roads, there are way too many slowpokes who do not pull aside to let you pass. And it is incredibly frustrating to follow them mile after mile and not be able to pass on short straights. This is the *number one* reason I installed a turbo. And in my experience 12 lbs per whp is needed to easily pass on short straights. That would be 250 whp on the BRZ. (My 10 lbs/hp currently doesn't really make passing any easier at lower speeds).

And also, having a 996TT on US roads with the speed **** cops is like being an animal in a cage that can't be let out.

Last edited by JasonC SBB; 07-20-2013 at 02:48 PM.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-20-2013, 02:45 PM
  #785  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

AVO's "Stage 2" is more like it, but spoolup IMO is still embarassing:

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...18&postcount=1

Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-stage_2_001.jpg  
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-20-2013, 02:57 PM
  #786  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Look like I spoke a bit soon, they got this at 10 psi. This would meet by personal lb/hp needs:

But 5 psi at 3000 RPM is still lag city to me:

Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-avo_stage_1_8_001.jpg  
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-22-2013, 01:28 PM
  #787  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Question

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
[...]And in my experience 12 lbs per whp is needed to easily pass on short straights. That would be 250 whp on the BRZ. (My 10 lbs/hp currently doesn't really make passing any easier at lower speeds).
Thanks for the review. I really need to get in one of these cars.

Is that 12 lbs per BHP or WHP? [Edit: Nevermind, I just re-read your post and saw you specify WHP]

With a curb weight of about 2800 pounds, that's about 233 WHP which I am thinking that would be more like 283 BHP if you assume the spread between WHP and BHP is proportionate. I think the stock cars typically dyno about 165 WHP on a standard Dynojet and are rated at 200 BHP.


Do you have an E36 M3 or was that ZX-Tex?
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 07-22-2013, 04:08 PM
  #788  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Yes I have a supercharged E36 M3.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-22-2013, 04:32 PM
  #789  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Question

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
Yes I have a supercharged E36 M3.
Ah, supercharged. I was going to ask about the comparison of the 86 relative to the E36, but it's less useful (for me) if your car has forced induction.

Is that the one you were saying was ~10 lbs / whp? Or were you referring to the Miata?
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 07-22-2013, 05:20 PM
  #790  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I thought you had an e39 jason?
18psi is offline  
Old 07-23-2013, 12:14 AM
  #791  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

I also have an E39 540i MTech 6speed.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-23-2013, 06:25 AM
  #792  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Chilicharger665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SE NM
Posts: 1,637
Total Cats: 57
Default

Innovate Motorsports Supercharger Kit Installed - 2013 Scion FR-S Long-Term Road Test

This should get good!
Chilicharger665 is offline  
Old 07-23-2013, 07:29 AM
  #793  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Chilicharger665
Compared to most aftermarket parts that kit is so clean and well thought out. The quality of the engineering is obvious. This is the same company that sells the LC1?
Leafy is offline  
Old 07-23-2013, 08:13 AM
  #794  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
Look like I spoke a bit soon, they got this at 10 psi. This would meet by personal lb/hp needs:

But 5 psi at 3000 RPM is still lag city to me:

I'd rather only be able to make 220-250rwhp but bring that low end up significantly.

like this:



because streetcar.
Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-brz.jpg  
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-23-2013, 09:22 AM
  #795  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I bet a gt2560r would produce something similar on that motor.
18psi is offline  
Old 07-23-2013, 11:29 AM
  #796  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Compared to most aftermarket parts that kit is so clean and well thought out. The quality of the engineering is obvious. This is the same company that sells the LC1?
Yup.

I am looking forward to the InsideLine long-term test, but I am also a little... leery of it because InsideLine is stuck with 91 octane Cali gas as far as I understand.
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 07-24-2013, 07:52 PM
  #797  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
JKav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 376
Total Cats: 47
Default

Yup, 91 octane.

Here's what it did on the dyno:
Innovate Motorsports Supercharger Kit Dyno-Tested - 2013 Scion FR-S Long-Term Road Test
JKav is offline  
Old 07-24-2013, 09:59 PM
  #798  
Senior Member
 
Opti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: DF-DUB
Posts: 625
Total Cats: 21
Default

The stock hp graph looks like ****.
Opti is offline  
Old 07-25-2013, 04:17 PM
  #799  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Nice compliation of FI dyno plots
FI Dyno thread - Scion FR-S Forum | Subaru BRZ Forum | Toyota 86 GT 86 Forum | AS1 Forum - FT86CLUB


But look:|
GT2560 with VVT @15 psi - MX-5 Miata Forum
My car with 1.8L made >260 hp peak
160 ftlbs @ 2500 RPM
190 ftlbs @ 3000 RPM

The BRZ with GT2871 or AVO kit, with 10% more displacement:
Scion FR-S Forum | Subaru BRZ Forum | Toyota 86 GT 86 Forum | AS1 Forum - FT86CLUB - View Single Post - FI Dyno thread

140 ftlbs @ 3000 RPM
190 ftlbs @ 3600 RPM

They need to put a GT2860RS on it.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-25-2013, 04:31 PM
  #800  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

Originally Posted by Opti
The stock hp graph looks like ****.
idk what you'd expect from 2.0 liters

Just for ***** and giggles I overlaid a stock K20 with a BRZ (stock and with some exhaust).

K20 is definitely better (especially if you were to set the VTEC crossover down at 4500 rpm where it belongs), but the BRZ engine is no slouch. Looks like theyre hitting pretty similar levels of BMEP. Compared to typical Subaru plots, looks like they actually tried to get some revs out of this one.
Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-brz_vs_k20_zps1baad78b.jpg  

Last edited by Full_Tilt_Boogie; 07-25-2013 at 04:51 PM.
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  


Quick Reply: Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 PM.