11/14/09 Midlantic/NE Dyno Day!
#66
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,898
Total Cats: 399
95 head will be going on along with the stock 95 intake manifold. Should see lower results than last time. Actually, I will pretty much have the same engine and turbo as Jan (Johndoe) but with absurdflow stuff instead of Begi so it'll be interesting to see what numbers it will put down.
Yah that'd be sweet, a 3rd different ABSURDflow manifold style with the 2560R, except he has the BEGI intake and a worked 99 head with cams.
#75
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,080
because when i had 'upgraded' to my 12x18x3 from my 12x11x3 I noticed an increase in spool time. i thought it was overkill for 230rwhp and decided id rather have a smaller core that flows better and is less of a impedance for the rad. I noticed right away a more responsive turbo after the swap and better coolant temps, but of course the trade off was AIT temps which i saw an increase of.
the only difference between these two setups is the tune and the IC. the smaller IC is the quicker spooling graph.
the only difference between these two setups is the tune and the IC. the smaller IC is the quicker spooling graph.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post