MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Megasquirt III Prototype

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2009, 07:22 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Marc D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milpitas, CA
Posts: 1,047
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by richyvrlimited

I agree, once it's out, it'll be very very hard to resist, at the very least it might put pressure on other ECU manufacturers to bring prices down a tad, which is good for everyone
I never thought about it that way. I am surpirsed about the SD ard support myself, possibly other ECUs may start incorporating it as well.
Marc D is offline  
Old 05-05-2009, 01:45 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Miatamaniac92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Austin, TX yall
Posts: 846
Total Cats: 0
Default

Here's a crazy question, would this make it easier/possible to add telemetry data?

There are GPS USB antenna's and there are also readily available accelerometers (Wii remote for example). Just an idea from a MS newb.

Chris
Miatamaniac92 is offline  
Old 05-05-2009, 02:33 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
DragonsMaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 112
Total Cats: 0
Default

It's possible if you're willing to write drivers for it, otherwise one component is speaking moon-language and the other is Sun Ra.
DragonsMaw is offline  
Old 05-05-2009, 05:41 AM
  #24  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
But why? Does the engine's VE actually change dramatically within a space of 250 RPM, or do you just want to create extra work for yourself?


That said, no idea what MS3's table size is. Probably bigger than is necessary.
Joe, it's mostly for total nit-pickers. For instance, I'd like to have a couple more rows in the 20-35kpa range, since my light-throttle cruise is forced rich due to a lack of resolution. I've fiddled with it a bunch and could never get it right (and now I don't care). If you're adding another thousand RPM or going beyond 230kpa, it would be nice to have the same resolution as an MSII setup across a wider range.

For many, yeah, it's just unnecessary, but you can always just ignore the top few rows/columns if the dyno clock is ticking a bit quickly.
Savington is offline  
Old 05-05-2009, 06:46 AM
  #25  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
Default

At the MegaMeet, the developers indicated it would still be 16x16. The presentations they gave are on DIY's site, I believe. Interesting stuff, and looks very promising.
Atlanta93LE is offline  
Old 05-05-2009, 08:48 AM
  #26  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by Miatamaniac92
Here's a crazy question, would this make it easier/possible to add telemetry data?

There are GPS USB antenna's and there are also readily available accelerometers (Wii remote for example). Just an idea from a MS newb.
Probably not.

For one, the USB port on the MS3 is a type B receptacle, typically found on client devices (DCE, for you old-timers) such as printers. Such devices typically are incapable of acting as hosts to other peripheral equipment, but only as clients to a host (ie, a PC.) Additionally, my suspicion is that this particular USB device is simply a virtualized RS232 connection. There was talk of implementing it that way at several points in the discussion, and doing so would have reduced its burden on the CPU to almost zero, whereas implementing the full-blown USB protocol in software would have chewed up considerable processor resources, which is not something you want to do in a mission-critical realtime system.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-06-2009, 12:12 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Marc D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milpitas, CA
Posts: 1,047
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Additionally, my suspicion is that this particular USB device is simply a virtualized RS232 connection. There was talk of implementing it that way at several points in the discussion, and doing so would have reduced its burden on the CPU to almost zero, whereas implementing the full-blown USB protocol in software would have chewed up considerable processor resources, which is not something you want to do in a mission-critical realtime system.
Joe hit the nail on the head. From further reading, its only a simple USB --> Serial connection.
Marc D is offline  
Old 05-06-2009, 10:33 AM
  #28  
Supporting Vendor
 
Matt Cramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,332
Total Cats: 67
Default

Correct. It's basically a copy of the circuit on the eMS-Pro.
__________________
Matt Cramer
www.diyautotune.com
Matt Cramer is offline  
Old 05-06-2009, 11:09 AM
  #29  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Cramer
Correct. It's basically a copy of the circuit on the eMS-Pro.
Ok, that explains the physical size of the connector, which I was wondering about. In the past, I've used a device which was packaged as a slightly oversized USB-B connector and integrated the electronics into the package. You spoke to the device in standard RS-232, and it presented itself to the host as an RS-232 port. Saved a tiny bit of board space, as it was only one device instead of two.

I can't really tell from the pictures, are they using one of the FTDI "FT232" series transceivers? Most of those are QFPs, but the only square chip I see is the processor.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-06-2009, 12:10 PM
  #30  
Supporting Vendor
 
Matt Cramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,332
Total Cats: 67
Default

I'm pretty sure it is an FTDI.
__________________
Matt Cramer
www.diyautotune.com
Matt Cramer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Big_gumby
WTB
0
09-30-2015 03:34 PM
Goldwar
DIY Turbo Discussion
2
09-29-2015 09:20 AM
Johnny Tater
MSPNP
1
09-27-2015 12:38 AM
psyber_0ptix
MEGAsquirt
4
09-22-2015 09:35 AM



Quick Reply: Megasquirt III Prototype



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48 PM.