Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

300hp to 400hp upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 12:06 PM
  #161  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

If you can't quantify the difference between what i think the intended use of your car is and that of a drag car, then you're beyond saving.
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 01:40 PM
  #162  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

I've seen the size of the oil orifice in the top of the block at the head gasket where it feeds oil to the Head. It is already quite small. Taking a lot of that oil away from the cams and valves might be a bit of an issue. And if you have a journal bearing turbo that might limit your oil a little as well.
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 01:56 PM
  #163  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Just because it can run, doesn't mean that it's correct or ideal. Sabotaging your lubrication for your quest to 400hp seems a bit counterintuitive.

Meh. I lost interest.
Old Nov 18, 2017 | 03:10 AM
  #164  
elior77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -480
From: Israel
Default

Old Nov 18, 2017 | 11:15 AM
  #165  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
As clean as the head port is, I don't like it. The head is fed through a fairly small orifice, so the pressure/flow is already restricted, and pulling from that doesn't seem like a good idea (and the data that DKMakinson posted backs that up).

There's also the fact that Mazda went through the hassle of re-drilling and re-tapping those ports in the block when they did the MSM, instead of just pulling the oil from the head. We'll be sticking with a block feed for our kits.
It's been mentioned that the limited edition 01 turbo miatas by Mazda Australia isn't the same company that built the MSM.

Read Joe's last comment on that thread. It makes sense.
Old Nov 18, 2017 | 01:20 PM
  #166  
sonofthehill's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,199
Total Cats: 591
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

I wouldn't do that. Look, the orifice in the block that feeds the head was sized to give the head proper flow. It is true that there's probably some over engineering, safety factor there That would be like intentionally running a smaller oil feed restrictor than the correct size to your turbo. Just doesn't seem like the best idea to me.

Maybe oil flows better to the head in Oz
Old Nov 18, 2017 | 09:39 PM
  #167  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

We've done over 100 easily.

We have had a bunch apart years after doing them and the cam journals and all wear surfaces look normal.

It's a super clean way to do it and seems to work fine... But that's just like... my opinion, man.

Dann

Last edited by nitrodann; Nov 19, 2017 at 02:00 AM.
Old Nov 19, 2017 | 04:17 AM
  #168  
elior77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -480
From: Israel
Default

Thanks for the input Dan, I think I'll keep me sexy oil line
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Nov 19, 2017 | 02:18 PM
  #169  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

I too have looked at that spot, and was gonna use it till I realized the whole block/restrictor thing and then I didn't. Interesting that others are running it without issue though. Has anyone measured oil pressure out of that spot? I can't imagine it being as high as pulling from the usual location.
Old Nov 19, 2017 | 04:40 PM
  #170  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

You get a few litres a minute no prob.

Dann
Old Nov 21, 2017 | 03:53 AM
  #171  
elior77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -480
From: Israel
Default



More progress, the engine is in not much left
Old Nov 21, 2017 | 06:54 AM
  #172  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Might want to try AN Fuel Line adapters instead of electric tape.

Hey, check out those AN fuel line adapters if you don't already have them!


Edit: im crabby because enough people in my branch conveniently called out "sick" to the point where I'm sitting idle without support to finish projects.

I can't even doodle on SolidWorks because licenses haven't been updated.

Last edited by psyber_0ptix; Nov 21, 2017 at 08:50 AM.
Old Nov 21, 2017 | 08:20 AM
  #173  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
Might want to try AN Fuel Line adapters instead of electric tape.
Don't get so caught up on the details, man.

lol

I was thinking the vacuum/boost reference line needed to be secured on the barb fittings when I saw it. I use small zip ties.
Old Nov 21, 2017 | 09:28 AM
  #174  
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 458
From: A cave in Va
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
I can't even doodle on SolidWorks because licenses haven't been updated.
Download Fusion 360, free for small business and students, about 99% of what solid works does with a very similar interface. I really like it.
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 08:24 AM
  #175  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

On the turbo oil feed. I have been running that for 10k street miles. Small journal turbo with a 1mm restrictor at the turbo feed. I have not pulled the valve cover since install.

I moved my OEM (1999) oil pressure switch to the head port on the opposite side. It always registers with the engine on, so that would indicate no less than 7psi at the head gallery.

I ran preliminary pressure tests on that port years ago, but Brain questioned my methodology.

Perhaps putting the gauge at the port where I now have my switch would be a good way to put this discussion to bed? Test pressure with and without the turbo feed, and that would tell if the head gallery is being starved.
Old Dec 4, 2017 | 05:52 AM
  #176  
elior77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -480
From: Israel
Default



Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Dec 4, 2017 | 11:49 AM
  #177  
sonofthehill's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,199
Total Cats: 591
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DNMakinson
Perhaps putting the gauge at the port where I now have my switch would be a good way to put this discussion to bed? Test pressure with and without the turbo feed, and that would tell if the head gallery is being starved.
No. The only way to put this discussion to bed is to run a T for the pressure gauge while feeding your turbo from it as well. After doing what you suggested. Better make it a pressure sensor so you can log during actual operating conditions.

However Dan suggested that drag cars have gone many miles without issues in that configuration. I will run the block feed on the intake side personally.
Old Dec 4, 2017 | 02:22 PM
  #178  
elior77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -480
From: Israel
Default

Reply
Leave a poscat -2 Leave a negcat
Old Dec 4, 2017 | 03:28 PM
  #179  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

are those rubber hoses? lololol
Old Dec 4, 2017 | 03:32 PM
  #180  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
are those rubber hoses? lololol
You don't like balloons?

Name:  4RAHvph.gif
Views: 63
Size:  1.73 MB



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 PM.