Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Ian's 99 build thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 11:37 AM
  #841  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I think you should mount a go pro in the tank and see what it looks like at low fuel level.

Is it the stock hangar? I know there are some differences in hangars between the years.
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 11:38 AM
  #842  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Pretty sure he's diagnosed it extensively and still couldn't find the cause
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 11:38 AM
  #843  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I never saw go pro in tank video though. Which I actually am just interested in seeing
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 12:19 PM
  #844  
codrus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
I think you should mount a go pro in the tank and see what it looks like at low fuel level.

Is it the stock hangar? I know there are some differences in hangars between the years.
It's the stock hangar with the in-tank regulator removed. This means it's dumping the return fuel a few inches above the level of the bottom of the tank. I was concerned that maybe the fuel spraying out of that was pushing the fuel away from the pickup, so we ran an inspection camera down the filler neck and made a video of it when cycling the fuel pump (sitting in the garage). It really wasn't all that spectacular, though. I haven't done it while driving, but it didn't seem like a likely cause.

I know I posted this video on mt.net, but can't find it in my build thread. Maybe it was another thread. This is what a fuel pump prime looks like inside the tank.



--Ian
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 12:38 PM
  #845  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

http://www.brembo.com/en/car/formula-1/f1-infographics
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 12:46 PM
  #846  
codrus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

One Brembo RCC rotor costs as much as my car does.

--Ian
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 01:27 PM
  #847  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
It's the stock hangar with the in-tank regulator removed.
I was running this exact same in-tank configuration when I had the return setup, and I had no issues.

DW200 on OEM hangar, DW provided filter sock FWIW.

Originally Posted by codrus
This means it's dumping the return fuel a few inches above the level of the bottom of the tank. I was concerned that maybe the fuel spraying out of that was pushing the fuel away from the pickup...
I could see this creating aeration in the fuel causing the pump to suck up some air? But beyond that you got me. Maybe order one of those fuel rail regulator adapters with the male AN fitting on it (because IIRC its the same bolt pattern) and throw an 90° fitting on it and shoot the return fuel off to the side somewhere. It may not accomplish anything, but for <$20 worth of parts it might be fun to test.

Of course, if this was the real issue, I feel like we would be seeing it more frequently.

Just a thought.
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 01:42 PM
  #848  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I'm more curious to see if the sock sees air when in turns. Then you could compare it to a car that doesnt see fuel starvation, and see if the sock is seeing air then.
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 01:49 PM
  #849  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Indeed I have a return system, and indeed I have the same problem. 1/4 tank and below and I'm hosed. I can run it down below a half tank though, so it does sound like my fuel starvation issue is not as extreme as yours.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 01:51 PM
  #850  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

maybe just lengthen the return tube/hose so that it dumps right onto the sock? dunno
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 01:55 PM
  #851  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Ed also has the same return setup as ian in the tank. Fuel flowing from where the regulator used to be.
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 02:49 PM
  #852  
sonofthehill's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,199
Total Cats: 591
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

A change in the return configuration seems like a good idea to me. You must be picking up bubbles.
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 05:41 PM
  #853  
Chilicharger665's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,694
Total Cats: 67
From: SE NM
Default

Try some of that Holley Fuelmat stuff?
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 06:12 PM
  #854  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

I, too, wondered about return turbulence. I suppose we could weld up a flange and tube. However, this video, and other evidence is that bubbling is not the cause.

Another thing I noticed. When I pulled the original pump, it took about 5 seconds for the fuel to all run out of the expanded sock.

However, the old, stock sock was so loose on the new DW pump, that I used the one from DW, instead of re-using the stock one. Later, I pulled this assembly and the fuel ran out of the DW sock in about half a second.

Miata does not sell the OEM sock as a separate item.
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 06:13 PM
  #855  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I'm imagining a high g corner, most of the fuel is one one side of the tank, small layer over the sock. The fuel splashing back might bubble that enough?
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 06:17 PM
  #856  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

Also, looks like when under high power, you are returning very little fuel to the tank. Is it possible you are running out of pump? 'Course that should change conditions much between full and empty tank.

EDIT: NVM. This is cycling pump. Duh… reading fail.

Last edited by DNMakinson; Apr 14, 2017 at 06:20 PM. Reason: Brain Fart
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 06:27 PM
  #857  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by Chilicharger665
Try some of that Holley Fuelmat stuff?
haha I was just thinking of this
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 06:28 PM
  #858  
codrus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DNMakinson
Miata does not sell the OEM sock as a separate item.
Assuming you mean "Mazda", sure they do, I bought one. Looks like it's part # BP4W-13-ZE1 (at least, for an NB1, didn't check other years). "Filter, fuel pump."

I swapped out the one that had come with my Walbro for a new OEM one back when I was first investigating this problem last summer (a few pages back on the build thread). The OEM sock is held open with a spring, the Walbro one is not. The OEM sock went onto the Walbro input just fine, no rattling. Haven't tried a DW pump.

It didn't make any difference in the fuel starvation, though.

--Ian
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 06:31 PM
  #859  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

@turbofan how did you get just a new OEM sock? https://www.miataturbo.net/race-prep...handers-89826/

Also, in above thread, Ian says he has an OEM sock, but pic on post 6 is not an OEM sock.
Old Apr 14, 2017 | 06:31 PM
  #860  
codrus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
I'm more curious to see if the sock sees air when in turns. Then you could compare it to a car that doesnt see fuel starvation, and see if the sock is seeing air then.
I'm not eager to dunk my GoPro in gasoline, or to have the fuel tank unsealed to the point where I can get the inspection camera inside while I'm out on track.

--Ian



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 AM.