Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Twin charged mischief –a risky parochial build, predicated on twisted logic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2017, 10:19 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 95
Default

In order to get the supercharger to sit as close as possible to the engine, the front left mounting bolt would have to co-exist with my fuel system.
So, I re-routed the fuel lines, and fuel injector wires, to run on top of the fuel rail.

Name:  DSC02986_zpsj1egrlln.jpg
Views: 12971
Size:  292.7 KB

After welding the supports on the manifold, I cut the main supercharger plate, and then levelled it using a dial gauge on the mill.
I had problems in my last set up, getting the belt aligned, which I don’t want to repeat.
Initially, I was going to mount the supercharger on a 1” plate, but after I found I had clearance, and that I had very little for the outlet, I decided to add an additional ½” to it.
Name:  20170107_221816_zpsrnur7qkk.jpg
Views: 12945
Size:  403.0 KB



Name:  20170219_174259_zpsmuiczkgn.jpg
Views: 12791
Size:  380.1 KB



Name:  20170101_230413_zpsz3obsprv.jpg
Views: 12857
Size:  395.3 KB
I went a little overboard, with the amount of fasteners holding the upper to lower plate.

Name:  20170413_102941_zpsfjz8oaws.jpg
Views: 12949
Size:  399.9 KB

Since I don’t have an aluminum welder, and the pipe to connect the supercharger mounting plate to the outlet pipe would need to start off “L” shaped,
and avoid various pieces (manifold, alternater etc) I ended up getting 1” thick aluminum plates, and cutting them into the correct shape.

I used styrofoam, to get close to the correct shape and then duplicate it.
The plates are bolted one after another to each other.It worked out ok, but was a lot of work.

Name:  20170407_220237_zpsh976qx4j.jpg
Views: 12846
Size:  294.0 KB



Name:  20170407_220317_zpsgdr0rn72.jpg
Views: 12831
Size:  256.5 KB

Not much space below the supercharger, to route the charge pipes.

Name:  20170409_203407_zps50dpak8g.jpg
Views: 12809
Size:  278.2 KB

The outlet port is a weird shape, but I only have 1.6" between the supercharger belt, and front cover of the engine, so needed to get creative.

Name:  20170414_112759_zpsojrencfi.jpg
Views: 12969
Size:  284.3 KB


This location for the tensioner, was found to not work. I couldn't get a ratchet on the tensioner to install the belt.
Name:  20170414_112823_zpsdfvk0vi8.jpg
Views: 12849
Size:  258.2 KB



Throttle body

Unfortunately, there was not enough space to mount the previously installed 70mm Honda throttle body.
I had to go with the stock unit, and had to machine the body down considerably.
Made a bracket, base plate and mounted it to the supercharger plate.
There was enough room to bring the 2.5” od piping right back to the intercooler.

Name:  20170502_221316_zpshor22bm1.jpg
Views: 12964
Size:  348.5 KB

Throttle body is pretty close to the engine bay walls, but I should have enough clearance there.

Name:  20170502_221321_zps1rj0ty9w.jpg
Views: 12781
Size:  362.9 KB



Bypass hoses nearly sorted out.

Name:  20170414_144636_zpsddkpkkfu.jpg
Views: 12989
Size:  321.9 KB



Exhaust system

With my previous supercharger system, I was running a custom header, and a 2.5” exhaust.
The exhaust consisted of a 200cell carsound cat, a magnaflow 4x22” round resonator and then a 5x11x22” magnaflow main muffler.
These were the largest well flowing components I could find, and were needed to get the car to be reasonable sounding.
When I put the turbo on,I installed a 3” down pipe, and 3” into the cat.The exhaust was incredibly quiet.Like a Buick.In fact, there was no exhaust note at all.
Since the 2.5” exhaust is hurting spool and flow, I decided topick up the same size magnaflow muffler in 3” and some mandrel bent tubing to connect things.
I had a left over 4x18” round resonator in 3” that I had installed at one point which I also installed.

So now I am running 3” front to back.I forgot how much I hate doing exhaust work.

Name:  20170414_130446_zpsyq9utxei.jpg
Views: 12714
Size:  367.3 KB



Name:  20170419_213314_zpsyui9ctfw.jpg
Views: 12724
Size:  276.6 KB

Tensioner bracket etc is now complete but sI till have quite a number of things to do. The 2 air cleaners is a temporary setup.
Currently I am implementing a single air cleaner solution.


Name:  20170502_220020_zpsybfa5rj5.jpg
Views: 12958
Size:  408.1 KB

Tensioner location

Name:  20170502_220033_zpsqvrlklzs.jpg
Views: 12600
Size:  344.3 KB
oreo is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 08:40 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
miataman04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Jonesboro Arkansas
Posts: 553
Total Cats: 25
Default

I can't believe no one else is commenting on this. I am very entertained by this build, it is very unique.
miataman04 is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 08:45 PM
  #23  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
Default

It's an awesome build, I've been following it closely. I can't wait to see it finished, and see datalogs/dyno plots/time slips/ and driving impressions. This thing is gonna be sweet.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 10:00 PM
  #24  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
viperormiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
Default

This is absolutely ******* insane. Props.
viperormiata is offline  
Old 05-13-2017, 11:00 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 95
Default

Originally Posted by viperormiata
This is absolutely ******* insane. Props.
thanks, hopefully it will be worth the trouble.

Originally Posted by patsmx5
It's an awesome build, I've been following it closely. I can't wait to see it finished, and see datalogs/dyno plots/time slips/ and driving impressions. This thing is gonna be sweet.
thanks Pat. I am very interested in seeing how this thing works, and yes I will be fully transparent, good or bad.

Originally Posted by miataman04
I can't believe no one else is commenting on this. I am very entertained by this build, it is very unique.
Need some humor. Link to Australian deck stain commercial. (I doubt it's real)

oreo is offline  
Old 05-13-2017, 11:29 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 95
Default

So I spent the last couple of days, finishing off the pipe from the supercharger to the turbo, as well as the piping for the single air cleaner.(ok,
and a bunch of little things)

The pipe leaving the supercharger is oval, since I have very little clearance between the front cover and the supercharger belt.
Even so, I ended up cutting half of the front cover off, to get more clearance.

This component is part of the supercharger mounting, so it needed an o-ring gasket to allow for easy installation of the outlet pipe.
I thought it would be difficult to machine this shape, but it was no problem really.
Name:  20170507_085243_zpsn9kqcpuc.jpg
Views: 13039
Size:  337.6 KB

The part below with the brown o-ring, mounts to the supercharger mounting plate assembly.
The other components connect the supercharger mounting plate, to the turbo inlet hose.
I am planning on measuring the temperature of the supercharger outlet
, hence the sensor.

Name:  20170512_220432_zps4ybifz10.jpg
Views: 12802
Size:  369.2 KB



Name:  20170512_220602_zpsb2ma3g5w.jpg
Views: 12692
Size:  371.2 KB

There may be an issue with intake noise.
When the turbo is fully spooling, the ETB2 opens which lets additional air in to the turbo inlet.

If you have ever had a silicone hose pop off on the pressurized side in a supercharged car, you know that the supercharger makes
a lot of noise when moving air. It can be loud and it's not a pleasing sound.


Not sure how bad this will be in this case, as all the air coming out of the supercharger is being gobbled up by the turbo. Maybe not that
much sound will actually be coming out . Anyway, I decided to mount the air cleaner under the fender which will give me cool air

and move any noise further away from the cockpit.

Quite a collection of pipes and silicone couplers, not to mention lots and lots of hose clamps.
Name:  20170513_070758_zps1e9jholc.jpg
Views: 12740
Size:  255.1 KB



A look at under the fender.



Name:  DSC03000_zpst2u6zluf.jpg
Views: 12930
Size:  212.5 KB

Not sure how long this cover up treatment will last.

Name:  DSC03002_zps6tinbhuy.jpg
Views: 12793
Size:  214.8 KB



Current under hood shot. Honestly I am surprised at how easy this is to work on. There is room to access all the fasteners, and
I can remove individual components pretty easily. I am pretty happy with the way this is going from an install point of view.


Name:  DSC03004_zpsvmubumwk.jpg
Views: 12872
Size:  248.4 KB

I had a huge setback with the tensioner bracket.I lost it.
I was test fitting it with the tensioner, and after doing that, I removed the tensioner, but forgot to remove the bracket.
The bolts were on finger tight and the bracket violently fell off while I was testing boost control on the highway.
Spent a good amount of time looking for it, but it went off into the grass beside the highway so it’s gone.
I was hoping to go to an autocross tomorrow(turbo only), but the boost control is not working properly (I upgraded to a 4 way valve and now the boost is oscillating badly)
and I don’t feel confident in the car right now.
Got some wiring, computer work and the tensioner bracket left to do. Getting closer....
oreo is offline  
Old 05-14-2017, 12:07 AM
  #27  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,775
Total Cats: 358
Default

Yeah, when I get this close it will probably be 24-7, vacation from work till done.
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 05-14-2017, 12:43 AM
  #28  
Art
Junior Member
 
Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 369
Total Cats: -251
Default

.

Last edited by Art; 06-11-2018 at 07:45 PM.
Art is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 05-14-2017, 06:59 AM
  #29  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Art
I must hand it to you for your ambition and all the great work with this build. It's mostly way over our heads I think. I hope it works well!
Thanks Art, I hope so too!

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
Yeah, when I get this close it will probably be 24-7, vacation from work till done.
Yes, it's hard to sleep, when your mind doesn't want to shut off.


Anyway, here is a video from the drags last year.
No traction, because the tires were picking up rubber. Should have done burnouts before each run.

Normally, I rarely get wheel spin in 3rd (unless the tires/temp are cold).

oreo is offline  
Old 05-14-2017, 10:16 PM
  #30  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 95
Default

Ok, new tensioner, but maybe not as good as the last one.
When installing the belt, the belt seems to jam on the edges of the bracket. Once it's on, it's golden.


Name:  20170514_214148_zps3ktksvxu.jpg
Views: 12691
Size:  246.5 KB

Now just have to wire in the additional temp sensor, and supercharger bypass valve and get the MS programmed for these 2 items.
Before the supercharger belt gets installed, I need to fix boost control, which is now out of control. The target in the graph below, is 200kpa!
All with settings that worked fine last year.

Name:  boost%20oscillating_zps9uxh0ghf.png
Views: 12834
Size:  106.5 KB
oreo is offline  
Old 05-14-2017, 11:52 PM
  #31  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,775
Total Cats: 358
Default

So I think you changed the exhaust, did you change anything else? It looks to me like you have closed loop activating before full spool and then too much P. I can maybe help you with this offline if you would like.
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 05-15-2017, 12:00 AM
  #32  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

Post log and tune
aidandj is offline  
Old 05-15-2017, 06:16 AM
  #33  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
So I think you changed the exhaust, did you change anything else? It looks to me like you have closed loop activating before full spool and then too much P. I can maybe help you with this offline if you would like.
Changes were exhaust, and a change from a 3 to 4 way valve. Intake manifold changed too, but I am not sure that would have that much of an effect.

Originally Posted by aidandj
Post log and tune
Thanks, posted.

Any suggestions are appreciated. You will note this tune is pretty rich. I added quite a lot of fuel after putting on the larger exhaust, and have not had a chance to pull any.
Attached Files
File Type: msl
2017-05-03_20.27.00a.msl (269.3 KB, 124 views)
oreo is offline  
Old 05-15-2017, 07:18 PM
  #34  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

The 4 way valve, done the only way that makes it worth it makes it much more difficult to have a smooth boost line.
Leafy is offline  
Old 05-15-2017, 08:44 PM
  #35  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,167
Total Cats: 856
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
The 4 way valve, done the only way that makes it worth it makes it much more difficult to have a smooth boost line.
This is what EWGs are for.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 05-15-2017, 08:58 PM
  #36  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

Uh. My boost is quite a straight line. 3psi spring. Dual port wastegate. 4 port valve.
aidandj is offline  
Old 05-15-2017, 09:09 PM
  #37  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
Default

Originally Posted by oreo
Changes were exhaust, and a change from a 3 to 4 way valve. Intake manifold changed too, but I am not sure that would have that much of an effect.


Thanks, posted.

Any suggestions are appreciated. You will note this tune is pretty rich. I added quite a lot of fuel after putting on the larger exhaust, and have not had a chance to pull any.
Take a look at this and perhaps give it a shot for boost control. Ideally post a log with this so we can see if it's any better or worse than before.
Attached Files
File Type: msq
2017-05-15_20.07.23.msq (112.7 KB, 192 views)
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 05-16-2017, 06:11 AM
  #38  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 95
Default

Man, I am so tired and sore. I need a day off to recover from the weekend!

I have heard from others who have twin charged their car, that boost control is a challenge. I don't quite understand why.

Pat -thanks for the file. I probably won't have the car back on the road till Wednesday for turbo only testing.
I need to make sure the electronics works perfectly out of the car first.
oreo is offline  
Old 05-16-2017, 02:50 PM
  #39  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,775
Total Cats: 358
Default

Originally Posted by oreo
I have heard from others who have twin charged their car, that boost control is a challenge. I don't quite understand why.
In my case, there are two control loops for regulating manifold pressure, and they are nested. With the limitations of the MS2, these control loops were not synchronized. Basically, I was running an independent loop wrapped around the MS2 loop. The two loops interact, and we have no plant normalization or gain scheduling hooks. The system has operating points where it is purely SC, others where it is purely TC, and then regions where it compounds (both TC and SC).

I don't think you will run into the same challenges with the architecture of your system. I regulate both the SC PR and the TC PR dynamically. ~I think~ your setup will allow for a set-it forget-it on the SC. Once the TC flow reaches a point where SC flow = TC flow you open your huge bypass (the TB) and then control with TC WG. The compound is pretty much handled automatically for you. I ~almost~ adopted this architecture with the version I am building now. Very compelling.
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 05-16-2017, 10:56 PM
  #40  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 95
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Take a look at this and perhaps give it a shot for boost control. Ideally post a log with this so we can see if it's any better or worse than before.
Pat
Got things back together tonight and loaded in these boost control setting. Logs attached.
With boost target set to 200KPI, boost runs straight up to 240KPA (4rth gear pull), which is the current over boost setting.
I also tried reducing the P with my previous set up, but probably reduced it too much (it overshot target by 20kpa, at which point I lifted). (didn't have much time, so need to hit this again tomorrow)


Ted
The people who told me boost control was a challenge when twin charging, were running the same set up as I am running.
I agree with you... Your setup is far more challenging which is one of the reasons I chose to go the simpler route.
Attached Files
File Type: msl
2017-05-16_22.17.22 50 8 3.msl (46.3 KB, 105 views)
File Type: msq
CurrentTune.msq (119.5 KB, 157 views)
oreo is offline  


Quick Reply: Twin charged mischief –a risky parochial build, predicated on twisted logic



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 AM.