|
|
Literally streaming right now, is video security footage proof of GA counters sending watchers home, then counting votes for hours alone:
Facebook Post |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1587701)
Why is it so controversial to suggest to have an election verified for accuracy?
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1587701)
Please provide the evidence to support the claim(s): "there is no fraud" or "this was the most secure election in history"
|
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1587702)
Literally streaming right now, is video security footage proof of GA counters sending watchers home, then counting votes for hours alone:
https://www.facebook.com/rightsidebr...91473484556883 here's just the highlight from that part of the testimony: Facebook Post Glad to see there's a news outlet out there that reports the current events... |
And here's a highlight from the footage where they pulled out (4) cases of fake ballots and were stuffing ballots, unobserved, after they sent home the watchers under false pretenses:
Facebook Post Baseless. |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 1587700)
unsupportable claims
Facebook Post |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1587707)
And here's a highlight from the footage where they pulled out (4) cases of fake ballots and were stuffing ballots, unobserved, after they sent home the watchers under false pretenses:
https://www.facebook.com/officialtea...15570162816880 Baseless. There was a batch of 23,487 votes uploaded at 12:18am that went minimum 98% for Biden (absolute minimum adjusting for possible decimal places). **Other Suspicious Batches in the Early Morning - Using Raw Edison Numbers ** 76,335 ballots uploaded at 12:55am went ~68% for Biden. 31,966 ballots uploaded at 12:57am went ~87% for Biden. 27,592 ballots uploaded at 1:01am went ~ 78% for Biden. 162,579 ballots uploaded at 1:34am went ~ 84% for Biden |
Literally after the video was presented:
https://media.thedonald.win/post/XWePWVJe.jpeg https://media.thedonald.win/post/i3iRBke6.jpeg |
(sigh) I feel as though we're having the same conversation over and over, using slightly different words each time. The video, by definition, has to have been debunked. In order for it not to have been debunked, then there must exist the possibility that it is true. If that were the case, then there is a possibility that bad orange man might have, in fact, been the winner of the election, and therefore would serve a second term as President. That cannot happen, as has been clearly and specifically stated by the left on many occasions. Therefore, the video must have been debunked. I don't know how to make this any clearer. |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 1587721)
(sigh)
|
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1587717)
Maybe one of these batches?
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...20c162c1bd.png Here's a video from the women in the screen capture above who worked on stuffing ballots: she all but confesses, but here we see her go back to work after ten days, asks for more work. To those that do not understand what you are seeing here. There are 2 bins of what appear to be absentee ballots in certified envelopes that are BLANK. Now, let us assume that they are not blank, and that only the envelopes facing us are blank, but that the rest of the ballots are legit.....Even making that assumption, ballots are not supposed to be processed in any way at all without supervision. This is to ensure that no one can just fill out blank ballots and pick names off of voter rolls to assign to them. In other words, there is zero legal reason for this woman to be in possession of this many absentee ballots period. Any processing by law requires independent watchers present to ensure fraud is not happening. The mere fact that she is going to be "working" with them IS THE ILLEGAL ACT. This crime is not like a violent murder, you just witnessed the crime itself and that is the whole point you are missing. Chain of custody is not followed here at all. Look at all the unsecured ballots all over the place in this video...she is pointing them all out for you. Chain of custody laws were broken and that was done intentionally, and with malice, by the elections officials who arrogantly assumed everyone was in on it, but who were also filled with so much narcissism, that they felt the need to show what they were doing online to their friends and family.....What don't you folks understand about this process? Do you understand that there are laws in place to protect the ballots for voter integrity purposes. Every bad vote allowed is a an honest vote taken away from an honest hard working tax paying citizen. These people showed us all that they simply do not care about our voices and opinions. But again, baseless. |
|
I also like to post photoshopped screen shots as legitimate.
|
TIL: when Blonde Braids Girl gives you a chic-fil-a bag full of cash (2:40), you give them a USB drive in return (4:15).
https://streamable.com/4hkf28 |
Originally Posted by z31maniac
(Post 1587750)
I also like to post photoshopped screen shots as legitimate.
My original comment above the photo was "let's play a game: is this CNN headline real or fake" but I had assumed you guys were smart enough to figure it out for yourself and the impact of the headline just after my post above made it extra juicy... But yes, it IS quite fun to post fake news stories hoping someone think it's real. The cunning or skillful act or scheme intended to deceive or outwit someone is what makes it fun! But go ahead and continue to be an election fraud denier. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1587763)
(Clear, indisputable evidence of a Chick-fil-a bag changing hands)
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM. |
|
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands