The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Reply
0
0
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 850
Total Cats: 107
From: Commiefornia
That was a mistake and he should have went straight to his rebuttal. I’m sure he was not happy with them targeting just him with fact checking. Even though I would say they were disputing a claim not fact checking. He was correct in his original statement about the Haitians getting special treatment. The left appear to care more about the immigrants than the US citizens.
Reply
0
0
That was a mistake and he should have went straight to his rebuttal. I’m sure he was not happy with them targeting just him with fact checking. Even though I would say they were disputing a claim not fact checking. He was correct in his original statement about the Haitians getting special treatment. The left appear to care more about the immigrants than the US citizens.
My .02, the missing questions about the Middle East, Iran, Ukraine, botched FEMA response, inflation and so many other topics that were left off the table made another 3 on 1 debate situation. And JD Vance STILL won easily.
Normies beat the Knuckleheads.
Reply
0
0
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Reply
0
0
Oversaw the rollout of $7.5 billion in electric charge stations, of which only 7 were built
Oversaw the rollout of $42 billion in broadband rollout, which hasn't even started
Elon Musk has done more for rural broadband this week than the federal government has done in the past 3 1/2 years. There are so many facepalm moments it's too hard to keep up.
Reply
0
0
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
XKCD has a nice comic, predicated upon the following:
The problem with statements like "No <party> candidate has won the election without <state>" Or "No president has been reelected under <circumstances>..."
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/ind...Precedent_2020
I am surprised that Randall hasn't gone down the following path for one of the two 2024 predictions:
"No Black candidate for President or Vice President has ever lost to a White opponent."
I mean, I suppose it's possible that the Republican party might field a black VP candidate in '24, which would invalidate such a prediction.
It'd be the intelligent thing to do. Actually, fielding a black P candidate and a gay female VP candidate would be the really intelligent thing to do, which... is probably why they won't do it.
(Setting a Google Calendar reminder to re-visit post #20287 in this thread on October 1, 2024.)
The problem with statements like "No <party> candidate has won the election without <state>" Or "No president has been reelected under <circumstances>..."
I am surprised that Randall hasn't gone down the following path for one of the two 2024 predictions:
"No Black candidate for President or Vice President has ever lost to a White opponent."
I mean, I suppose it's possible that the Republican party might field a black VP candidate in '24, which would invalidate such a prediction.
It'd be the intelligent thing to do. Actually, fielding a black P candidate and a gay female VP candidate would be the really intelligent thing to do, which... is probably why they won't do it.
(Setting a Google Calendar reminder to re-visit post #20287 in this thread on October 1, 2024.)
Well, here we are four years later. As I predicted, the Republican party was not intelligent enough to field a black candidate for President nor a gay female candidate for VP. Instead, they have nominated an old white man to run against the Dems' young black woman.
At least the old white man had sense enough to select a young white man as his VP. On the downside, however, Vance is a theocrat who has publicly stated on numerous occasions that Braineack and I are both sociopaths because we have no children, and that we should have less voting power than single mothers on welfare because of that.
Brainey, who'd have thought that you and Mrs. Braineack the childless cat lady were actually radical leftists? And you seemed like such a nice couple...
Reply
0
0
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Also, as you know spend all my money on expensive doors and overpriced day-labors instead of gov't propaganda for my offspring.
Reply
0
0
Well, here we are four years later. As I predicted, the Republican party was not intelligent enough to field a black candidate for President nor a gay female candidate for VP. Instead, they have nominated an old white man to run against the Dems' young black woman.
At least the old white man had sense enough to select a young white man as his VP. On the downside, however, Vance is a theocrat who has publicly stated on numerous occasions that Braineack and I are both sociopaths because we have no children, and that we should have less voting power than single mothers on welfare because of that.
Brainey, who'd have thought that you and Mrs. Braineack the childless cat lady were actually radical leftists? And you seemed like such a nice couple...
At least the old white man had sense enough to select a young white man as his VP. On the downside, however, Vance is a theocrat who has publicly stated on numerous occasions that Braineack and I are both sociopaths because we have no children, and that we should have less voting power than single mothers on welfare because of that.
Brainey, who'd have thought that you and Mrs. Braineack the childless cat lady were actually radical leftists? And you seemed like such a nice couple...
Reply
0
0
